>^ ^ r ?. ;^ _ >^^ f^*^, ^ ii/- v*^*. v^r " ■-■v^J^St^t ^' * ;^-\L,:' -:f4; .-•'^■^?«( *^>^ z^..- . ^ V-^ j*r fir* jy^Ri/iifi HARVARD UNIVERSITY. I. I B K A 11 Y MUSEUM OF COMPARATIVE ZOOLOGY. uoio "b,V^\.0 -- ©(iJtcrW. L.\^ \<^K TRANSACTIONS OF THE CONNECTICUT ACADEMY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES Incorporated A. D. 1799 VOLUME XVI .. Publications of Yale University YALE UNIVERSITY PRESS NEVvA HAVEN, CONNECTICUT THE R. WAGNER SOHN PRESS 1 OFFICERS FOR 1910-11. I'resitlent. Hon. SIMEON E. BALDWIN. Vice- Preside nis. Prof. ALEXANDER W. EVANS, Prof. CLIVE DAY, Prof. HANNS OERTEL. Sccretari/. Dr. GEORGE F. EATON. Treasurer, Mr. GEORGE PARMLY DAY. Jjtbrnrian. Mr. JOHN CHRISTOPHER SCHWAB. Conniiittee on Publication. Hon. S. E. BALDWIN, Chairman, Prof. A. S. COOK, Prof. E. S. DANA, Prof. E. P. MORRIS, Prof. A. W. EVANS, Prof. CLIVE DAY, Prof. H. OERTEL, Mr. J. C. SCHWAB. !i> A COJSTTIilNTS Page Additions to the Library, May 1, 1910 to June 30, 1911 . . vii— xxix Art. 1.— The Ajiphipoda OF Bermuda. By Beverly Waugh Konkel 1—116 Art. II.— The Clausula in Ammianus Marcellinus. By Austin Morris Harmon 117 — 245 Art. III. — Nutrition Investigations on the Carbohydrates of Lichens, Algae, and Related Substances. By Mary Davies Swartz 247-382 Art. IV.— New Spiders from new England. By J. H. Emerton 383—407 ADDITIONS TO THE LIBRARY OF THE CONNECTICUT ACADEMY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES By Gib^t and Exchange from May 1, 1910, to June 30, 1911. Aix-eh-Troxehce.— Unive7-site. Faculte des lettres. Annales I-III, 2. 1907-09. Taculte de droit. Annales I-IV, 2. 1907-10. Faculte de droit et des lettres. Annales I— II; 2. 1905—06. Altenburg, S.-A. Naturforschende Gesellschaft des Osterlandes. Mitteilungen aus dem Osterlande. N. F. 1910. Atnerican Academy of Arts and Sciences. Proceedings. XLVI, 13-24, XLVII, 1-3. 1911. American Antiquarian Society. Proceedings. XX, 2. 1910. American Geographical Society. Bulletin. XXXIX, 1-XLIII, 6. 1907-11. American Museum of Natural History (New York). American Museum Journal. X, 3— XI, 5. 1910—11. Guide Leaflet. 24. 26-30, 33. 1907-11. American Philosophical Society. Proceedings. XLVIII, 194-L, 198. 1909-11. American Society of Sanitary and Moral Prophylaxis. Educational pamphlets. 1—6. 1910. Amherst College. Catalogue. 1910-11. Amiex.s. — Academie des Sciences. Memoires. I.VI. 1909. Sociefe Linneenne du Nord de la France. Bulletin. No. 225, 1891 ; XIX, 381-92. 1908-09. Amsterdam. — Koninkl. Akademie van Wetenschappen. Jaarboek, 1909. Proceedings. Section of sciences. XII, 1-2. 1909/10. Verliandelingen. Afd. Natuurkunde, Sectie II, Deel XV, 1—3, XVI, 1-2. 1909/10. Verslagen van de gewone vergaderingen van de wis- en natuur- kundige afdeeling. Deel XVIJI, 1-2. 1909/10. MaatschappiJ tot nut van 't Algemeen. Publikation. 93, also IX, 4. 1911. The Apteryx. (Roger Williams Park Museum, Providence, P. I.), 1, 1—3. 1910. Argentine Republic. Agricultural and pastoral census of the nation. Monograph. I— III. 1908. VIII Additions to the Library. Australasian Association for Advancettient of Science. Report of Meeting. XII. 1909. Address of President. 1907. Section C. Bamberg. — Remeis Sternivarte. Veroffentlichungen. Reihe II. Band I, Heft 1. 1911. Basel. —Naturforschende Gesellschaft. Bericht. XXI. 1909. Verhandlungen. XX, 3-XXl. 1910. Batavia. — X. Natuurkundige Yereeniging. Natuurkundig Tijdschrift. XL, Ser. 8, I ; XLIII, 1-4. R. Magnetical and Meteorological Observatory. Observations. XXX-XXXI and append. 1907-08. Observatory. Erdbeben Bericlit. 6a~c, 7a-b, 8 a, 9 a, 11a, 12 a. 1909. Seismological Bulletin. Jan. to Dec. 1910; Feb. 1911. Belgium. — Academic 11. d'' Archeologie de Belgique. Bulletin. I-IV. 1910. Bergen. —Museum. Aarsberetning. 1909. Aarbog. 1909, 2 to 1910, 2. Crustacea of Norway. By G. O. Sars. Vol. V, parts XXVII-XXX. Berlin.— JiT. Museum fiir Naturkunde. Mitteilungen aus dem Zoologischen Museum. IV, 3 ; V, 1—2. 1910-11. Bericlit des Zoologischen Museums. 1909. Birmingham.— A^aiM/-a/ History and Philosophical Society. List of Members and Annual Report. 1910—11. Proceedings. I— XII. Bologna. — R. Accademia delle Scienze deW Istituto di Bologna. Memorie. Classe di Scienze Morali. Sezione di Scienze Storico- Pilologiche. Ser. I. T. Ill, 2-IV, 1. 1908-10. Sezione di Science Giuridiche. Ser. I. T. Ill, 2-IV, 1. 1908-10. Adunanza, June 22. 1910. Rendiconti. Classe di Scienze Morali. Ser. I. T. III. 1909_10. Classe di Scienze Fisiche. Anno 1883—4; N. S., V, 1—4. 1900-01; XIII, 1908-09. Bombay. - R. Asiatic Society. Journal, Bombay Branch. LXIV. 1909. Bonn. — Naturhistorischer Verein der preussischen Rheinlande und Westfalens. Sitzungsberichte. 1909, 2 to 1910, 1. Verhandlungen. 1~IV, VI-VII, XXIII, 1-2,1844-66; LKVI, 2. 1910. Bordeau.x. — Commission Meteorologique de la (iironde. Bulletins. 1908, 1909. Societe des Sciences Physiques et Naturelles. Additions to the Library. IX Memoires. T. V, 1. Proces-verbaux. 1908-09; 1909-10. Boston, Mass. — Museum of Fine Arts. Bulletins. 46-51. Annual Report. XXXV, 1910. Society of Natural History. Proceedings. XXXIV, 9-12. 1910. Bradford. — Scientific Association. Journal. Ill, 2. 1910. Bremen. — Meteorologisches Observatoriurn. Deutsclies Meteorologisclies Jahrbuch. XX. 1909. Breslad. — Schlesische Gesellschaft fiir vaterlandische Cultur. Jahres-Bericlit. LXXXVIII, 1909. ■ Naturwissenschaftlicher Verein. Abhandlungen. XX, 1. 1910. Brooklyn. — Museum of the Brooklyn Institute of Arts and Sciotces. Bulletins. IV, 11, 14-16; VI, 3-8, 15. 1910-11. Science Bulletins. I, 17 and Index, 1910. Museum News. V, 6-8; VI, 1-8. 1911. Year Books. 1907/08-1909/10. Brcnn. — Nuturforsihender Verein. Verhandlungen. XLVII. 1909. Brunswick. — Verein fiir Naturwissenschaft. Jahresbericht. XVI. 1907/08-1908/09. Brussels. — Acadanie E. des Sciences^ des Lettres et des Beaux-Arts de Belgique. Annuaire. LXXVI-LXXVII, 1910-11. Bulletins. Classe des Sciences. 1909, 9 to 1911, 4. Memoires. Classe des Sciences. Ser. II. T. II. Fasc. VII— VIII. T. III. Ease. I -IV in 8vo. T. II. Jardin Botanique de VEtat. Bulletin III, 1. Musee R. d'Hisfoire Naturelle. Memoires. T. IV-V. 1907-08. Observatoire Royale. Annales Astronomiques XII, 2— XIII, 1. 1910. Annuaires Astronomiques. 1911—12. Societe Entomologique. Annales. LIII-LIV. Memoires. XVIII. 1911. Societe R. de Botanique. Bulletins. XLVI, 1-4, XLVII, 1-4; also XVI-XVII, 1-3, XVIII, XX. 1878-1881. Societe R. Bclye de Geographie. Bulletin. XXXIII, 1-XXXlV, 6. 19U9-10. X Additions to the Library. Brussels.— S'ocie/e R. Zoologique et Malacologique. Annales. XLIV. 1909. Societe cles Sciences. Annales. XXXIV, 2-4; XXXV, 1-2. 1909/11. Revue des Questions Scientifiques. Ser. Ill, XVII, 1— XIX, 2. 1910-11. Bdcarest. — Observatornl Astronomic si Meteorologic. Bulletin Lunar. XVI. 'l907. Societe des Sciences. Bulletins. XVI, 1-2; XVIII, 5-XXI, 1; also II, 7-12. Ill, 1-2, X, 5. Buchan Field Club Museum, Peterhead. Transactions. X. S. I, 1. Budapest. — Academic Hongroise des Sciences. Matliematisclie und Xaturwissenscliaftliclie Berichte aus Ungarn. XXIV-XXV. 1906-07. Rapport sur les Travaux. 1909. Kiralyi Magyar Tudomdny, Egyetem Tanrede. 1903/04; 1905/06-1908/09; 1910/11. Buenos Aires. —Dn-ecdo« General de Estadistica. Boletin Mensual. X, 108-XI, 120. 1909-10. Museo Nacional. Anales. Ser. III. T. XI-XIII. 1910. Sociedad Cientifica Argentina. Anales. LXIX, 1-LXX, 4. 1910. Buffalo.— S'ociV^?/ of Natural Sciences Bulletins. X, 1. 1910. Caen. — Societe Linneenne de Normandie. Bulletin. Ser. 6, T. II. 1908-09. Memoires. XXIII, 1-2. 1908-09. Calcutta. — Asiatic Society of Bengal. Journal and Proceedings. IV (Index) ; V, 1—11 ; VI. 1—6. 1908-10. Memoirs. Ill, 1. Historical Society. Annual Report. 1910. Journal. V (No. 10). 1910. Halifornia Academy of Sciences. Proceedings. I, pp. 7-288 (4th Ser.); HI, pp. 57-72 (4th Ser.). Cambrai. — Societe d^ Emulation. Memoires. LXIII-LXIV. 1908-09. Cambridge (England).— Observatory. Report. 1909-10. Fhilosophical Society. Transactions. XXI, 12-14: Index to XIII. Addilious to the Library. XI Cameron, J^si.. — Gulf Biologic Staiion. Bulletin. V.. 1910. Cah ADA. — Geological Survey. Depai'tmeut of Mines. Sunimaiy Eeport. 1909. Maps 1006, 1008, 1077, 1082, 1091, 1093, 1101, 1110, 1115. 1137. 1143, 1170. Department of the Interior. Maps, Manitoba, Saskatchewan and Alberta. 1909. Forestry- Branch. Bulletin. 9, 16-20. Canadian Railway Club. Official Proceedings. X, 1-5. 1911. Caradoc and Severn Valley Field Clubj Shrewsbury. Record of Bare Facts. 20, 1910. Transactions. V, 2, Catania. — Accademia Gioenia di Scienze Naturali. Bolletino delle Sedate. Ser. II, 11-17. 1910-11. Societa degli Spettroscopisti Italiana. Memorie. XXXIX, 1-7, 9-11 ; XL, 1-3. 1910-11. Cellule, La. XXVI, 1. 1910. CuAVTJhTKVEG. — Observed or io AstronoDtico National. Anuario. XXXI. 1911. Chemnitz. — Naturwissevschaftliche Gesellschaft. Bericht. XVII. 1909. Cherbourg. — Societe Rationale Academique. Memoires. XVIII. Chicago. — Field Museum of Natural History. Publications. 142-150. Christiania.— A'z/^ Maguzin for Naturcideiiskaberne. XLIX, 1. 1911. V idenskabs-Selskabet . Porhandlinger. 1909. CnuR. — Naturforschende Gesellsc/ia/t Graubiindens. Jahres-Bericht. LII. 1909-10. Cincinnati. — L?o^(^ Library. Bulletins. Mycological Series, 3 (1902), no. 1 ; 13 (1909;, no. 4. Pharmacy Series, 12 (1910), no. 2. Report of Lloyd Mycological Museum. I. 1895. Bibliographical Contributions. 1-2. 1911. Mycological Notes. 32-5. 1909-10. Index to II. 1905-08. Museum Association. Annual Report. XXIX. 1909. Journal. XX 1, 2. 1910. University. Report of Chairman and President. 1909. Observatoiy Publications. 17. 1905—10. Record. VI, 5-VII, 4. 1910-11 University Studies. Ser. IL Vol. VI, 1-4. 1910. XII Additions to the Libra)-}'. Colorado College. Publications. General Series. 50-52. 55. Science Series. XII, 25, 47—49. Social Science Series. II, 3. Colorado Scientific Society. Proceedings. IX, 345 -X, 38. Year-Books. 1882-1910. Colorado. — University of. Studies. Vir, 2-VIIL 3. 1910-11. Comiecticut Historical Society. Annual Eeport. 1910. Copenhagen. — L'.4caf^fmie jR des Sciences et des Lettres de Danemark. Bulletin (Oversigt). 1909, (3-1911, 1. Xaturhistoriske Forening. Viden.skabellge Meddelelser. 1909. CoRDNA. — R. Acadeniia Gallega. Boletin. V, .35-VI, 46. Cracow. — Academic des Sciences. Materyaly. 1907-09. K. K. Sternnrtrte Eesultate. 1910. Meteorologische Beobachtungen. March 1910-May 1911. Croydon. — Microscopical Club. Reports and Abstracts of Proceedings. I-V, VI-VIIl, 1871- 1878. Annual Proceedings and Transactions. 1878/81 to 1909/10 ; In- dex to 1870/83. Natural History and Scientific Society. Annual Proceedings and Transactions. 1909—10. Danzig. — Naturforschende Gesellschaft. Katalog der Bibliothek. Heft 2. Schriften. N. F. Bd, XII, 4. Westpreussischer Botanisch-Zoologischer Vereiu. Bericlite XXVI-XXIX; XXXI-XXXII. 1905-10. Davenport, Ia. — Academy of Sciences. Proceedings. XII, pp. 223-40. Denison University. Bulletin of the Scientific Laboratories. XVI, pp. 1-346. 1910. Detroit. — Museum of Art. Annual Report. 1910. Bulletins. IV, 2-V, 2. 1910-11. Di.ioN. — Academic des Sciences, Arts et Belles-Lettres. Memoires. 3e Ser. T. II-III. ]874-7(;. 4e Ser. T. II. 1907-10. DoRi'AT.— GeZe/tr^e Estnische Gesellschaft. Sitzuuo-sberichte. 1909. Additions to the Library. XIII DoRPAT. — Naturforscher-Gesellscha^t. Archiv. Ser. II, Band VI. Sitznngsberichte. XVIII, 2-4. 1909. Dresden. — Naturwisseiischaftliche Gesellschaft Isis. Sitzungsberu'hte und Abhandhingeii. JuU', 1909 to Dec, 1910. DvBLia. —Eoyal Dublin Society. Economic Proceedings. II, 1—2. Scientific Proceedings. N. S. VII, 24-3B ; Index. 1898-1909. Scientific Transactions. V, 2d Series. VI. R. Irish Academy. Proceedings. Series A, XXVIII, 1-XXIX. 2: Series B. XXVIII, 1-XXIX. 4; Series C, XXVII, 10, XXVIII, 1- XXIX, 4. CJare Island Survey. XXXI, 4-5, 22, 39. Trinity College. Hermathena. 34-36. 1908-10. Dutch East Indies. — K. Natuurkundige Yereeniging. Natuurkundige Tijdsclmft. LXIX. East Kent Scientific and Natural History Society. Transactions and Reports. Ser. II. Vol. IX. HiGmBVRGR.— Botanical Society. Transactions and Proceedings. XXV. Geological Society. Transactions. IX, special part and V. B. Observatory. Annals. III. 1908. R. Physical Society. Proceedings. XVIII, 2. Royal Society. Proceedings. XXX, 5, 7; XXXI, 1-3. Elberfeld. — CJiemisches Untersuchnngsamt. Bericht fiber die Tatigkeit. 1908. Katurivissenschafflicher Verein. Jahres-Bericht. XII. 1909. Elisha Mitchell Scientific Society. Journal. XXV, 3-XXVI, 4. Emden. — Naturforschende Gesellschaft. Jaliresbericht. XCIV. 1908/09. Kleine Schriften. 4, 6-10, 14. Erfurt. — K. Akademie geineimiUtziger Wissenschaften. Jahrbucher. XXXV. 1909. Essex Institute. Annual Eeport. 1910, 1911. Florence.— Bii^toffca Nazionale Centrale. Bolletino. 110-124. XIV Additions to the Libra)-}'. France. — Minidh-e de V Instruction Piibliqne, dcs Beaux-Arts et des Cultes. Rapport sur les Observatoires Astronomiques de Province. XXIV, XXIX, XXXI, XXXVIII, XLIII, LVI, LXII, LXVII, LXX, LXXII, LXXIV, LXXVIII, LXXXI, LXXXIII, LXXX VII, XC, XCIII. 1887-1906. Frankford, Vk.— Historical Society. Papers. II, 2. Frankfurt, a. ^i.— Deutsche Malakologische Gesellschaft. Nachrichtsblatt, XLII, 3-XLIII, 2. 1910-11. Senckenbergische Naturforschende Gesellscha/t. Abluindlungen. XXXI, 1-XXXIII, 3. Bericht. 1-4. 1910. Verein fiir Geographic nnd Stafistik. Jahresbericht. LXXIII-LXXIV. 1909-10. Frankfort, a. O.—Naturwi^senschaftlicher Verein. Helios. XXVI. 1910. Monatliche Mitteilunoen. II, 7-VI. 188.5-87. Franklin Institute. Journal. CLXIX, 3-CLXXII, 1. 1910-11. Fradenfeld. — Thurgnuische Naturforschende Gesellscliaft. Mitteilungen. XIX. 1910, Freibdri;, i. 'B.— Naturforschende Gesellschaft. Bericht. XVIII, 1. 1910. Fribodrc4.— Socie^e Fribourgeoise des Sciences. Bulletins. Ill, 1888/87 ; IV, 1887/90 ; VII, 1893 97-XII. 1903/04 XIV, 1905/OBXV-lI, 1908/09. Geneva. — L'Insfifut National Geneoois. Bulletins. XXXVIII-XXXIX. 1909. Memoires. XIX-XX. 1901-10. Societe de Physique et d^Histoirc Naturelle. Comptes rendus des Seances. XXVII. 1910. Memoires. XXXVI, 2-XXXVII, 1, 1910-11. Ge^oa. — Museo Civico di S'oria Naturale. Annali. Ser. 3. IV. 1908-10. Germany. — Kaiserl. Leopoldinisch-Carolinische deutsche Akademie der Natur- forfcJier. Abhandlungen. Nova Acta. XC, 2-4; XCI, 3; XCII, 1 XCIII, 2. Leopoldina. XLV-XLVI. 1909-10. Giessen. — Oberhesiische Gesellschaft fiir Natur- und Heilkunde. Bericht. N. F. Medizinische Abteilung. \. 1909. Naturwissenschaftliche Abteilung. III. 1908- 1909. Kegister zu Biinden I-XXXIV. Gi^kHGOW'.— Natural History Society. Journal. H, 1-4. 1909/10. Additions to the Library. .XV Glasgow.— Glasgow Naturalist. I— II. 1909—10. -R. Philosophical Society. Proceedings. XLI. 1909-10. GoETEBORG.— X Gescllschaft der Wissenschafteti. Handlingar. 4de folj H. 12. 1909. GoETTiNGEN.— ZiT. GesellscJutft der Wissenschaften. Nachrichten. Geschaftliche Mitteilungen. 1910, 1. JMathematisch-physikalische Klasse. 1908—10. Philosophiscli-historische Klasse. 1910, 1—2. Graz. — Naturicissenschaftlicher Verein fur Steiermark. Mitteilungen. XXVII-XLIV. 1890-1907. Great Britain.— i^02/a^ Photographic Society. Annual Exhibition. LV. 1910. Grenoble.— ["?n'j;ersi/e. Aunales. XX, 2-3; XXI, 1-3; XXII, 1-3, et supplement ; XXIII, 1. Haarlem. — Mttsee Teyler. Archives. Ser. II. XII, 1. 1910. Soeiete HoUandaifie des Sciences. Archives neerlandaises. Ser. II, XV, 1—5. 1910-11. Teylers Godgeleerd Genootschnp. Verhandlingen. N. S. XVII. Hamburg. — Deutsche Seewcirte. Aus dem Archiv. XXXII, 2-XXXIII, 4. 1909-10. Ergebnisse der meteorologischen Beobachtungeu. 1901 -05. Deutsches meteorologisches Jahrbuch. XXXII. 1909. Jahresbericht. XXXIII. 1910. AnnalenderHydrographieundmaritimenMeteorologie. XXXVIII, 4-XXXIX, 6. 1910-11. Xachtrag zum Katalog. IX. 1909-10. Na turivissoischaf/licher Verein. Abhandlungen. XIX. 3—5. Verhandlungen XVII. 1909. Harvard College. — Astronomical Observatory. Annals. LIX, 6; LXV ; LXVI; LXVIII, 1; LXXI, 1. Annual Report. LXV. 1910. Circulars. 153—65. Museum of Comparative Zoology. Annual Report. 1909/10. Bulletins. LII, 15-17; LIII, 5; LIV, 2-5. Memoirs. XL, 1-2; XLI, 1-2; XXVI, 7; XLV, L Havana.— C'o^e^io de Belen. Observaciones meteorologicas y magneticas. 1909. Havre. — Soeiete freoJogique de Normandie. Bulletin. XXIX. 1909. XVI Additio)is to the Library. Heidelberg. — Historisch-philosophischer Verein. Neue Heidelberger Jahrbiicher. XVI, 1-2. 1909. Helsingfors. — Societas Scientiarum Fennica. Acta. XXXV, 1--10; XXXVI, 1-4; XXXVII, 1-2. 4-11; XXXVIII, 1, 3; XXXIX, 4; XL, 1-4, also XIX. 1893. Bidrag till kaniiedom af Fiulands natur ocli folk. 52—53, 1893 ; 67 (1-3), 68 (1-2), 1910. Ofversigt af forhandlingar. VI- VIII, 1863-66 ; LI, A-C, LII, A-C, 1908-10. Meteorologisches Jalirbuch. Ill, 1903 & Supplement. Observations meteorologiques. 1899—1900. Hermannstadt. — Siebenbiirgischer Verein fur Naturwissenschaft . Verhaudluugen und Mitteilungen. LIX. 1909. Hudson Codnty, N. H.— Historical Society. Publications. 1-7. 1908. Illinois. — State Laboratory of Natural History. Bulletins. VIII, 4-5 and Index ; IX, 1-3. 1910. India. — I. Department of Agriculture. Report on Progress of Agriculture. 1909/10. Memoirs. Botanical series. I, Index; 11,9; III, 1-6; IV. 1. Chemical series. 1, 8—9. Agricultural Researcli Institute, Pusa. Report. 1909/10. Bulletin 16, 1910. Geological Survey. Memoirs. XXX VII, 4-XXXVIII. 1910. Palfeontologica In- dica. Ser. XV. Vol. IV, 2-3; VI, 2; X. S. Ill, 1. Records. XXXVIIl, 4-XL, 3. 1910. Meteorological Department. Animal Summary. 1909. Memoirs. XX, 8 and Index; XXI, 2. Monthly Weather Review. Dec, 1910 to Feb., 1911. Rainfall of India. XIX. 1909. Report of Administration. 1909/10. Board of Scientific Advice. Annual Report. 1908/9; 1909/10. Indian Museum. (Calcutta). — Annual Report. 1907—09. Catalogue of the Indian Decapod Crustacea. I, 2. Echinoderma. Part VI, Asteroidea, 2. 1910. Indiana. — Academy of Science. Proceedings. 1909. Iowa. — State University. Bulletins. Laboratory of Natural History. VI, 1. Contributions. Physical Laboratory. I, 4. 1911. 'L'BiKl.kSD.— Pharmaceutical Society. Calendar. XXXV. 1911. Additions to the Library. XVII Italy.— i?. Coinifato Geologico. Bollettiiio. 2-3. 1910. Jamaica Institute. — Journals. I, 1—3 ; II, 2, 5— G. Jenaische Zeitschrift fiir Natnrwissaischaft. XXXIX, 1— XL, 2. 1^*10—11. JoJm Crerar Library. Annual Eeport. XVI. 1910. Handbook. 1910. List of Books ou the Histoiy of Science. Jan., 1911. Johns Hopkins University. — Circulars. 1910, 4—1911, 5. Kansas. — University. Science Bulletin. V, 1-11. 1910. Iv.^Sk'^.—Observatoire Meteorologique. Bulletins. 1904-09. Societe Pliysico-Mathematique. Bulletin. Ser. II, XVI, 3. 1910. Kharkoff. — Societe cles Sciences Physico-Chimiques. Travaux. XXXVI, 1908. KiKL.—Jyonimission zur wissenschaftlichen Untersuchung der detifschen Meere. AVissenschaftliche Meeresuntersuchungen. Abteilung Kiel. N. F. XI-XII. K. Universitdt. Verzeichnis der Vorlesungen. W. 1909/10. S. 1910. Clu-onik. 1909/10. Dissertations. Kiev.- — Societe des Naturalistes. Memoires. XX, 4-XXI, 2. 1910. Kladsenbdrg. — Universite. Annales. 1907/08-1908. 1909. Kodaikanal Observatory. — Annual Report. 1909—10. Bulletins. XIX-XXIII. 1910. KoENiGSBERG, i. Pr. — Physikalisch-ukonomische Gesellschaft. Schriften. L. 1909. Kyoto.— 7. University. College of Science and Engineering. Memoirs. II, 1-14; III, 1-3. 1909-11. La Plata. — Archivos de Pedagogia y Ciencias Afines. 16—23. 1909—11. La Rochelle. — Academic. Section des Sciences Naturelles. Annales. 35. 1906/07. Flore de France. XIV. 1910. Ladsanxe. — Institut Agricole. Observations Meteorologiques. XVIII, 1904 ; XXII, 1908. Societe Vnudoise des Sciences Naturelles. Bulletins. Ser. V, 167-72; also Ser. II, XI, 66, 68. 1871/73. Leiden. — Nederlandsche Dierkundige Yereeniging. Aauwinsten der Bibliotlieek. I. 1908/09. Tijdschrift. Ser. II. Deel XI, 3-XII, 2. II XVIII Additions to the Library. Leiden. — Rijksuniversiteit. Sterrewacht. Verslag. 1908-10. Leipzig. — K. Sachsische Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften. Berichte. Mathematisch-pliysische Klasse. LXI, 4-5; LXII, 1-5. 1909-10. Verein fur Erdkunde. Mitteilungeu. 1908-09. Leriche. Maurice. Les poissons oligocenes de la Belgirpie. Annee 1910. Lemberg. — Seccenko- Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften. Chronik. II, 38 ; III, 39 ; IV, 40. 1909. Sammelsclirif t. Mathematisch - Nat urwissenschaf tlich-Arztliclie Section. VII, 1 : IX ; XIV. Liege. — Societe R. des Sciences. Memoires. VIII. 1909. Limbdrg. — Provinciaal Genoofschap voor Geschiedkundige Wetenschappen, Taal en Kunst. Limburg's Jaarboek. XVI, 4 ; XVII. 1910-11. Linz. —Museum Francisco-Carolinuni. Jahresbericlit. 69. Lisbon. — Sociedade de Geographia. Boletim. Ser. XXVIII, 1-12: XXIX, 1-3. 1910-11. Liverpool. — Geographical Society. Transactions and Annual Eeport. XVIII-XIX. 1909-10. London. — Biological Society. Proceedings. XXIV. 1909/10. R. Geographical Society. Geographical Journal. XXXV, 3-XXXVII, 5. 1910-11. Geological Society. Quarterly Journal. 261-65. 1910-11. Geological Literature added to Librar^^ 1909. Linnaean Society. Journal. Botany. 272. 1909. Zoology. 201, 202, 207. 1910. List. 1910/11. Proceedings. 122. 1909-10. Mathematical Society. Proceedings. VIII, 3-7; IX, 1-7. 1910-11. R. Microscopical Society. Journal. 1910, 1-1911, 3. National Physical Laboratory. Annual Report. 1909, 1910. Collected Eesearches. VI- VII. 1910-11. Patent Office. Catalogue of Library. I. Authors. 1899. Library Series. 1-2, 4-18. 1905-07. Subject Lists. X. S. AA-BE, BF-BL. 1908/09. Additions to the Library. XIX London. — Royal Society. Philosophical Transactions. Ser. A. 161-76.' Ser.B. 273-84. 1910-11. Proceedings. Ser. A. 563-79. Ser. B. 555-68. 1910-11. Louisiana. — State Museum. Natural History Survey. Bulletin. 1. 1911. Ldeneburg. — Naturii'issenschaftlicher Verein. Jahreshefte. XVIII. 1908/10. Ldnd. — K. Universitet. Acta. :N. F. V, 1-2, 1909; Register. 1864-1904. Biblioteks Arsberattelse. 1909. LuxEMBODRGf. — Institut Grand-Ducal. Section des sciences naturelles, physiques et niatheniatiques. Archives trimestrielles. N. S. IV, 1-V, 1. 1909-10. Lyons. — Academic des Sciences. Memoires. Ser. Ill, 11. 1911. Sociefe d' Agriculture., Sciences et Industrie. Annales. 1909. Universite. Annales. Science-Medecine. X. S. 1, 6, 25-29. 1899-1909. Annales. Droit-Lettres. X. S. II, 4, 21, 22. 1900-1910. Societe des amis de I'Universite. Bulletins. XXIII, 1— XXIV, 1, 1910-11. Bulletin Historique du Dioclse de Lyon. I, 6 ; II, 2. 1909. 1911. Madras. — Fisheries Bureau. Bulletins. 4—5. Madrid.— ii. Academia de Ciencias Exactas. Fisicas y Naturales. Memorias. XV. Revista. VIII, 7-IX, 8. Comision del Mapa Geologico. Boletin. X-XI. 1908/09. Observafo7-io. Anuario. 1911. Eesumen de las Observaciones Meteorologicas. 1902—05. MAGDEBDRG.—iVf nse«m fih- Natur- und Heimatkunde. Abhandlungen und Berichte. II, 1. 1910. Maine Agricultural Experiment Station. Bulletin. 190. 1911. Manchester, England —Geographical Society. Journal. XXV, 2-XXVI, 2. 1909-10. Literary and Philosophical Society. Memoirs and Proceedings. LIV, 2-LV, 1. 1909-11. Museum. Publications. 67- 71. 1910. University. Publications. Historical Series. IX— XL 1911. Medical Series. XIII. 1911. II* XX Additions to the Library. Mannheim. — Verein fur Naturkunde. Jalu'esbericlit. 75. 1910. Marburg. — Gesellschaft zur Beforderung der gescnufen Naturwissenschaften. Schriften. X, 2-4, G-7, 10, 12 ; XII, 1-7 ; XIII. 1-6. Sitzungsberichte. 1909-10. Mecklenburg. — Verein der Freunde der Nafurgeschichte. Archiv. LXIII, 2-LXW. 1909-10. Melbourne. — National Museum. Memoir. 3. 1910. Mexico. — Instituto Geologico. Boletin. 25, 27. 1910. Parergones. Ill, 3-8. 1909-10. Instituto Medico Nacional. Anales. July, 1908 to Feb., 1909 and March to April, 1910. Ohservatorio Meteorologico Magnetico Central. Boletin. May, 1909 to Dec, 1909 ; Feb. to June, 1910. Sociedad Cientifica ^'•Antonio Alzate'\ Memorias y Revista. XXVII, 4 -XXVIII, 8. Michigan. — Academy of Sciences. Report. XII. 1910. Middelburg. — Zeeuwsch GenootscJuip der Wttensclm]>pe)i. Archief. 1910. Milan. — jB. Istituto Lombardo di Scienze e Lettere. Rendicouti. Ser. II. XLII, 16-20, XLII, 16. 1910. R. Osservntorio Astronoiuico di Brera. Pubblicazioni. XL VII. 1910. Societa Italiana di Scienze Naturali e del Mnseo Civico. Atti. XLVIII, 4-L, 1. 1910-11. Milwaukee. — Public Museum. Annual Report. XXVII-XXXVIII. 1909-10. Bulletin. I, 1. Minnesota. - Geological and Natural History Survey. Botanical Series. Report of Survey. V. Botanical Studies. IV, 1, VIII; Ser. II, 1-6; Ser. Ill, 1-8. Plant Studies. I-IV. Bulletins. 1, 2, 5, 8, 10. Zoological Series. II— IV. MissovRL—B ota'fiical Garden. Annual Report. XXI. 1910. MoDENA. — R. Accademia di Scienze, Lettere ed Arti. Memorie. Ser. II, T. XII, 1, 1896; Ser. Ill, T. VIII. 1910. Societa dei Naturalisti e Mafematici. Annuario. II-VI, VII, 2-4, XU, 3-4, Ser. II, T. XIV. Atti. Rendiconti. Ser. Ill, T. VII, 2; Ser. IV, T. Ill, 1-2, VI, XI and XII. Additions to the Library. XXI ^o-^Tk-^x.— Agricultural Experiment Station (Bozeman). Annual Report. XVI. 1909. ■ Bulletins. 77-80, 82-83, 85. 1909-11. College of Agriculture and Mechanical Arts. Experiment Station Circular. 4. 1910. University of Montana. Bulletin, m. 1910. Montevideo. —Museo Nacional. Auales. IV, 1-2. 1910 ; also Ser. II, T. I, 3. Observatorio Nacional Fisico-Climatologico. Boletin. 79-84. 1909. MoNTPELLiER. — Academic des Sciences et Lettres. Bulletin Mensual. 1910, 4-7; 1911, 1-4. Memoires de la Section de Medecine. Ser. II, T. III. Memoires de la Section des Sciences. Ser. II, T. IV, 1—2, V, 2. Moscow. — Societe I. des Naturalist es. Bulletins. 1908, 3-1909. N. S. XXIII. MiJNSTER i.'SV. — West fdlischer Provitizial-Verein fiir Wissenschaft undKunst. Jahresbericht. XXXVIII. 1909-10. Munich. — K. Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften. Abhaudlungen. Mathematiscli-physikalische Klasse. XXIV, 3 ; XXV, 1-4. 1909-10. Snpplement-Bande. I, 7-10; II, 2; III, 1 ; IV, 1-2. Sitzungsbericlite. Mathematiscli-physikalisclie Klasse. 1909. Abhandlung. 1909, 15-1910, 9. Philosophisch-philologisch und historisclie Klasse. 1909. Abhandlung. 1909. 7-9. 1910. 1-6. Xancy. — Academic de Stanislas. Memoires. Ser. VI. T. VI- VII. 1908-10. N.iPLES.— i2. Instituto d'Incoraggiamento. Atti. Ser. VI. T. LX-LXI. 1908-09. R. Accademia delle Scienze Fisiclie e Matematiche. Atti, Ser. II, T. XIV. Rendiconti. Ser. III. T. XV, ^-XNi, 12. 1910 ; also supple- ment 189. R. Accademia di Scienze Morcdi e Politiche. Atti. XXXIX-XL. 1910. Rendiconti. XLVIII-XLIX. 1909-10. R. Universitd. Museo Zoologico. Annuario. X. S. Ill, 1-12. 1910. Xat.\l. — Government Museum. Annals. II, 2. 1911. Naturae Novitates. 1910, 3 to 1911, 7. Nedchatel.— ,4ca«?emte Facidte des Lettres. Recueil des Travaux. V. 1910. XXII Additions to the Library. Neuchatel. —Societe Keuchateloise des Sciences Natnrelles. Bulletins. XXXV-XXXVIT. 1907-10. New South Wales.— iiwMerm Society. Proceedings. No. 135-8. 1909-10. New York. — Academy of Sciences. Annals. XIX, 2-XX, 2; XXI, pp. 1-86. 1910-11. Botanical Garden. Bulletins. VI, 21-22; VII, 25. 1910-11. Public Library. Bulletins. XIV, 4-XV, 6. 1910-11. State Museum. Memoirs. XII, 1 ; XIII. 1909-10. New Zealand. — Institute. Transactions and Proceedings. XLII. N. S. 1910. Newcastle-upon-Tyne.— iVor//io/J5^7?^te«f/ Institute of Milling and Mechanical Engineers. Transactions. LX, 1-9; LXI, 1-4. 1910-11. Annual Report. 1909/10. Norfolk and Norioich Naturalists' Society. Transactions. IX, 1. 1910. North Carolina. — University. Philological Club. Studies in Pliilology. V-VII. 1910-11. North Dakota. — University. Quarterly Journal. I, 1-4. 1910/11. School of Mines Bulletin. N. S. I, 2, 6. 1909. North Staffordshire Field Club. Annual Report and Transactions. XLIV-XLV. 1909-10. 1910-11. Northamptonshire Natural History Society and Field Club. Journal. XV, 117-24. 1909-10. NortJmmbet-land, Durhat)i and Newcastle-upon-Tyne, Natural History Society. Transactions. I, 1-3; II. N. S. Ill, 1-2. 1911. Nova Scotia. — Department of Mines. Report. 1910. Nova Scotian Institide of Science. Proceedings and Transactions. XI, 3-4; XII. 2. 1904-8. Nuremberg. —A^afwr/jis^onsc/ie Gesellschaft. Abhandlungen. VIII; XV, 1-3; XVIII. Odessa. — Observatoire Mcteorologique et Magnefique. Annuaire. 1908-09. Ohio. - State Academy of Science. Proceedings. V, 6. 1910. Geological Survey. Bulletins. 10-12. 1909-10. O K L ahoma . — Geological Survey. Bulletins. 2, 5. G. 1911. Additions to the Library. XXIII Oklahoma. — State University. Eesearcli Bulletins. 3-4. 1910. Oporto. — Academia Polytechnica. Annaes Scientificas. Ill, 3-V, 4. 1910-11. Oxford. — Eaddiff'e Library. Catalogue of books added during- 1910. University Observatory. Astrograpliic Catalogue. V— VI. 1910. Paedologisches Jaarboek. I, 1900 ; VI-VII. 1906-09. Palermo. — Societd di Scienze Naturali ed Economiche. Giornale di Scienze Naturali ed Economiche. XXVIII, 1911. Paris. — Ecole Polyteclmique. Journal. 2e Ser. XIII-XIV. 1910-11. Ecole Normale Superieure. Annales. XLV, 1-XLVIII, 6. 1908-11. Museum d'Histoire Naturelle. Bulletins. 1909, 8; 1910, 1-5. Laboratoire de Phanerogamie. Xotulae Systematicae, par H. Lecomte. T. I-II, 2. 1909-11. Observatoire. Papport Annuel. 1909-10. Societe Zoologique de France. Bulletins. XVII, 1, 8; XXXIV. Memoires. XXII. 1909. Pasadena. — T/troop Institute. Bulletins. 46-50. 1910-11. Pathological Revista Quindicinale. II. 36—44. 1910. VF.wj.—Ministerio de Fomenlo. Cuerpo de Ingenieros de Minas. Boletin. 75—76. 1910. Philadelphia. — Academy of Natural Sciences. Journal. XIV, 2. Geographical Society. Bulletins. VIII, 2-IX, 2. 1910-11. Wagner Free Institute. Transactions. VII. 1910. Photographic Journal, London. L, 2— LI, 6 and supplement to 5. 1910—11. FiSA.—Societa Toscana di Scienze Naturali. Atti. Memorie. XXV. 1910. Processi Verbali. XIX. 2-5: XX, 1. 1910-11. PiTTSBCRGH. — Camcgie Library. Annual Reports. V— VIII, XIII-XIV. 1901-4, 1909-10. Carnegie Museum. Memoirs. IV, 2, 5—6. Publications. 60, 61, 63, 66. Potsdam. — A strophysikalisches Observatorium. Publikationen. XX-XXII, 1. 1910-11. XXIV Additions to the Libnuy. Potsdam.— Photographische Himmelskarte. V, 1910. Prag. — K; K. Bohmische Gesellschaft der Wissenschaffen. Jahresbericht. 1909, 1910. Sitzuiigsberichte. 1909, 1910.^ Ceske Spoleciwsti Entomologkke. Casopis. VII, 1 -VIII, 1. 1910—11. Deutscher Naturwissenschaftlich-niedizirnscher Verein /«>• Bolnnoi. Lotos. LVri-LVIII. 1909-10. K. K. Sternioarte. Magnetisclie uiid lueteorologisclie Beobachtungen. 1909. Providence. — Roger 'Williams Park Museum. Bulletins. 7-8. Monographs. 14, 1-5, 17. Quebec. — Literary and Historical Society. Transactions. V, 1 ; 1900-1902. ^o. 24. Province. Guides. 1909-10. Societe de Geographic. Bulletins. IV, 1-V, 3. 1910-11. Regensbdrg. —ffis^omcAer Verein von Oberpfalz luid Regensburg. Bericht. VII. 1907-09. Verhandlungen. LXI. 1909. Zoologisch-Mineralogischer Verein. Abliandlungen. Hefte 1, 3, 5, 7-9. 1849-64. Repertoire d''Art et d' Archeologie. Annee I, 1—4. 1910. RiGx.— Naturforscher -Verein. Arbeiten. N. F. XII. 1910. Korrespondenzblatt. LIII. 1910. Bio de Janeiro. — Institute Oswaldo Cruz. Memoria. I[, 1-2, 1910. Rockefeller Institute of Medical Research. Studies. X-XII. Roentgen Society. Journal. VI, 23-VII, 27. 1910-11. Rome.— jR. Accademia dei Lincei. Atti. Serie V. Rendiconti. Classe di Scienze fisiche, mate- matiche e natural!. XIX, 6-XX, 10. 1910-11. Rendiconto dell'adunanza solenne. 1910, II. Accademia Pontifica Romana dei Nnovi Lincei. Atti. LII, 1-2; LXIII, 1-7. 1909/10. St. Louis. — Academy of Sciences. Transactions. XVIII, 6; XIX, 2-11; XX, 1-3. St. Petersbourg. — Academic I. des Sciences. Bulletins. Classe Phys.-Math. Ser. V, 1898, 5 ; Ser. VI, 1910, 6 - 1911, 11. ' Memoires. Classe Phys.-Matb. Ser. VIII, V, 3. T. XVIII, 9, 14, 1.5; XXI, (i; XXrv. 1, 2, 4-10; XXV, 1-8. Additions to the Library. XXV St. Petersbourg. — Memoires. Classe Hist.-Phil. Ser. VIII, T. Ill, ] ; VII, 1-2; VIII, 13-14. I. Botanic Garden. Acta. XXVI, 2 ; XXVII, 3 ; XXVIII, 3. Comife Geologique. Bulletins. XXVIII-XXIX, 4. 1908-10. Memoires. X. S. 40, 51-2, 56-7, 59. 1908-10. I. Bu8sia7i Geographical Society. Bulletins. XLV, 1-9; XLVI, 1-5. 1909-10. Report. 1909. Santi.4Go de Chile. — Dentscher NafunvissenscJiaftlicher Verein. Verhaudlungen. V, 1—2 ; VI, 1. Soeiedad Cientifica de Chile. Actes. XIX. 1909. Sao 'Pavlo.— Soeiedad Scientifica. Revista. Jan., 1909 to Aug., 1910. Schweizerische Naturforschetide GesellscJiaff. Verhandluugeu. XCII-XCIII. 1909-10. Sharp, D.- — Fauna Hawaiiensis. II, part. Ill ; III, part VI. Siena. — ii. .Accademia dei Fisiocratici. Atti. Ser. IV, II, 1-6. Smithsonian Institution. National Museum. Bulletins. 39, 71—4. Contributions from National Herbarium. XIII, 3-9; XIV, 1-2; XV. Proceedings. XXXVII-XXXVIII. 1911. Report. 1910. Bureau of American Ethnolog3^ Bulletins. 37, 43, 45, 49—50. Societa Entomologica Italiana. Bulletins. XLI, 1-4. 1909. South Africa. —i?o^«Z Society. Transactions. II, 1—2, 1910—11, and Index. South-Enstern Union of Scientific Societies (Woking). South-Eastern Naturalist. 1910. South London Entomological and Natural History Society. Proceedings. 1909-10; 1910-11. Staten Island Aftsociation of Arts and Sciences. Proceedings. Ill, 1-2. Staten Island, N. Y. — Natural Science Association. Proceedings. II, 3—4. Stockholm. — /sT. Svenska Vetenskaps-Academi. Arkiv for Botanik. IX, 2-X, 1. Arkiv for Kemi, Mineralogi ocli Geologi. Ill, 4—6; IV, 1. XXVI Additions to the Library. Stockhol:«.— Arkiv for Matematik, Astronomi ocli Fysik. VI. 1-3. Arkiv for Zoologi. VI, 1-4; VII, 1. Arsbok. 1910. Handlingar. XLV, 3-XLVI. 3. Meteorologiska lakttagelser. L, Append., LI. Les Prix Nobel ; 907-8. K. Bibliothek. Accessions-Katalog. 23. 1908. Entomologisk Forening. Eutomologisk Tidskrift. XXXI, 1-4. 1910. Forstliche Vers uch san stalt. Meddelanden. 7. 1910. Stuttgart. — Verein fur Vaterldndische Nafnrkunde in Wilrttemherg. Jahreshefte. 1910, 1. Sydney. — Australian Museum. Memoir. IV, 12. Report. LVI. 1910. Special Catalogue. No. I, Vol. Ill, pt. 1. Tasmania.— Royal Society. Papers and Proceedings. 1909. Texas. — University. Bulletins. 129, 134-8, 140, 142-3, 145-6, 152-3, H;6-7, 170, 178. TiFLis. — Physikalisches Observatoriuni. Beobachtungen. 1899-1904. Seismische Mouatsberichte. 1909. 1—7. Tokyo. — Deutsche Gesellschaft fiir Natur- und Volkerkunde Osfasiens. Mitteilungen. XII, 2. 1910; also XI, 2. 1908. University. Journal of tlie College of Science. XXVII, 7-20. XXXVIII, 1-6. Calendar. 1909-10. Toronto. — Canadian Institute. Proceeding.s. II, no. 12, part 6. Transactions. VIII, no. 19, part 4. University. Publications. Biological Series. 8. G-eological Series. 6—7. Toulouse.— ^ca^^emie des Sciences. Memoires. Ser. X. T. IX. Universite. Eaculte des Sciences. Annales. Ser. II, T. X. 3—1 ; Ser. Ill, T. I, 1, 3. Bihliotheque Meridionale. Ser. I, T. I, 4 XIII, XIV; Ser. II, T. III. VIII-X, XII-XIII. Additions to the Lilrra}'}'. XXVII Toulouse. — Annuaire. 1899—1900. Bulletins. B, 1-2. Observatoire Astronomiqne, Magmiique et Meteorologique. Annales. VI. 1907. Sociefe (VHistoire Naturelle. Bulletins Trimestr. XLII, 3-4; XLIII, 2-8. Triest. — Osservatorio Maritimo. Eapporto Annuale. 190(i. Tromsoe. —Museum. Aarsberetning. 1908-09. Aarshefter. 30-32. 1907-09. Geologiske Undersegelser. IV, Pettersen. Teondheim. — li. Norske Videnskabers Selskab. Skrifter. 1872, I ; 1874, I-II ; 1909. Tufts College. Studies. Scientific Series. Ill, 1. Turin. — Mtisei di Zoologia ed Anatomia Comparatu. Bolletini. XXVI, 616-33 and index. United States. — Department of Agrictdture. Crop Reporter. 1910, 5-10. Library. Bulletins. 46—53. Monthly Bulletins. I, 3-II, 4. Division of Publication. Xo. 713. Weatlier Bureau. Mt. Weather Observatory. Bulletins. II, 4-III, 5 and Index. 1910. Department of the Interior. Geological S^rve3^ Annual Eeport. XXXI. 1910. Bulletins. 323-4, 328, 337, 343, 361, 364-8, 370, 381-2, 385-6, 398, 406-7, 415, 417, 419-20, 422, 425-30, 432-47, 453, 465. Geologic Atlas. Polios 167-176. Professional Papers. 68. Water Supplj^ and Irrigation Papeis. 237, 239, 241, 243-55, 260, 262, 264. Library of Congress. Outline Scheme of Classes (preliminary), Dec, 1909. Publications issued since 1897, Jan., 1911. Report of Librarian. 1910. Naval Observatory. Publications. 2d Ser., VI-VII. 1911. Superintendent. Synopsis of Report. 1910. Upsala. — K. Universitef. Arsskrift. 1909. Geologiska Institution. Bulletins. IX, 17—20, 1908—11 ; and Index, I— X. XXVIII Additions to the Libraiy. Utrecht. — K. NederlandscJi Meteroloyisdi Insiituuf. Annuaire. 1909, A-B. Mededeelingen en Verliandlingen. 102 (10-11), 1910/11. Provinciaal Utrechfsch Genootschap van Kunsten en Wetenschap2>en. Aateekeningen van het Verhandelde in de Sectie-Vergaderingen 1910. Verslag van het Verhandelde. 1910. Vanderbilt Southern History Society. Publications. 1. Vanderbilt University. Oriental Series. VI-VII. 1908-10. Vienna. — K. K. Akademie der Wissenschaften. Erdbeben-Konnnission. Bericht und Chronik. V. 1910. Mitteilungeu. XXXVII. 1909. Sitzungsberichte. Mathenmt.-natiirwiss. Klasse. CXVIII, 8— CXIX, Abt. Ill, 5. K. K. Central-Anstalt f'iir Meterologie und Geodynamik. Jahrbiicher. N. F. XLIII-XLV. K. K. Geologische Eeichsanstnlt. Abhandlungen. XVI, 3; XX, 3; XXII, 1. Jahrbiicher. LX, 1-3. 1910. Verhandlungen. 189B (13-15); 1903 (1); 1909 (15-18); 1910 (1-18). K. K. Naturhistorisches Hofmusenm. Annalen. XXIII, 4 -XX IV, 2. 1909-10. Verein zur Verbreitung Naturwissenscliaftlicher Kenntnisse in Wien. Schriften. L. K. K. Zoologlscli-Botanisdie Gesellschaft. Verhandlungen. LIX, LX. 1909-10. Virginia^ University of. Philosophical Society. Publications. Bulletins. I, 1—4. 1910. Humanistic Series. I. 1. 1911. Scientific Series. I. 1-5. 1910-11. Warren, Pa. — Academy of Sciences. Transactions. I, 2. 1908/09. Western Pennsylvania Engineers' Society. Proceedings. XXVI, 4-XXVn, 5. 1910-11. Wiesbaden. — Nassauischer Verein fiir Naturkunde. Jahrbuch. (J3. 1910. Wilson Ornithological Club. Oberlin, O. Wilson Bulletins. 70-4, 1910-11; also XXIII, 2 ; Indices to XXI-XXII. Wisconsin Geoloyical and Natural History Society. Bulletins. XIX-XXII. Road Pamphlet. 5. Additions to the Library. XXIX Wisconsin Natural History Society. Bulletins. N. S. VII, 3-4, VIII, 4 -IX, 2. 1909-11. Occasional Papers. I, 1, 3, II, 1—3, III. WtJRZBDRG. — Physikalisch-medizinische Gesellschaft. Sitzungs-Berichte. 1909, 1-5; 1910, 1-5. Wyoming Historical and Geological Society. Proceedings and Collections. XI. 1910. Yale University. Astronomical Observatory^. Transactions. II, 2. 1910. Z iJRicH. — Naturforscli ende Gesellschaft. Vierteljahrsschrift. LIV, 3-LV. 2. 1909-10. TRANSACTIONS OF THE CONNECTICUT ACADEMY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES Incorporated A. D. 1799 VOLUME 16, PAGES 1-116. MAY, 1910 The Amphipoda of Bermuda BY B. W. KUNKHL, Ph.D. SHEFFIELD SCIENTIFIC SCHOOL, YALE UNIVERSITY I'UBLISHED UNDER THE AUSPICES OF YALE UNIVERSITY NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT 1910 vf AUG TRANSACTIONS OF THE CONNECTICUT ACADEMY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES Incorporated A. D. 1799 VOLUME 16, PAGES 1-116. MAY, 1910 The Amphipoda of Bermuda BY B. W. KUNKEL, Ph.D. SHEFFIELD SCIENTIFIC SCHOOL, YALE UNIVERSITY; PUBLISHED UNDER THE AUSPICES OF YALE UNIVERSITY NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT IQIO WEIMAR : PRINTED BY R. WA(JXER SOHN I. — The Amphipoda of Bermuda. By B. W. KuNKEL, Ph.D. The Amphipoda of the Bermudas and West Indies apparently have been almost entirely neglected by systematists. The only notices which we have of Amphipoda from Bermuda are those of Caprella danilevskii (Czerniavski, 1868), recorded by Stebbing in the " Chal- lenger " Report (vol. 39, p. 1364, pi. 145), Cyamns fascicularis (Verrill, 1903) from a sperm whale captured off Bermuda and ex- hibited at St. George's, and Orchestia agilis (Smith, 1873) which Verrill notes as being abundant (Trans. Conn. Acad., vol. XI, p. 21—22, 1903). The greater part of the material for the present study was col- lected by Prof. Verrill and parties during two expeditions to the islands in the spring of 1898 and 1901, and was turned over to the writer for study in the spring of 1906; besides this material, several vials bore the label of G. Brown Goode, 1876—77, several that of W. M. Rankin, 1898, and one vial was received from Dr. L. J. Cole, dated Bermuda Biological Station, July 15, 1903. In general, no exact data regarding the localities and surrounding conditions were recorded, but where such are known due reference will be made to them. The collecting by Verrill was done in shallow water along the shore, at most in only a few fathoms, and nearly all the forms are shallow water species. The most striking peculiarity of the Amphipodous fauna of Ber- muda is its close relationship to that of the Mediterranean. Of the 45 species recorded from Bermuda, 19, or possibly 20, of them occur also in the Mediterranean, and nearly all of these are abundant in European waters. Eighteen of these 45 species are peculiar to Bermuda and only 7 species which are not endemic, are not found also in the Mediterranean. Thus nearly ^25 or 44*^/0, of the known species of Bermuda Amphipoda are Mediterranean. In contrast to the richness of European forms the 9 species common to South and Central American shores is striking, especially in view^ of the fact that 93 ^{^ of the Decapod Crustacea of Bermuda have been re- corded from the Florida Keys and the West Indies (Verrill, Trans. Conn. Acad., vol. XIII, p. 452, 1908). This paucity of forms from Central and South America probably has little significance, however, 4 B. W. Kunket, and is due simply to the small amount of collecting of the smaller Crustacea from these waters. The distribution of the species of Amphipoda known to occur in the waters of Bermuda is designated in the following hst. New species are printed in heavy-faced type and new genera are preceded by an asterisk. 1. Lysianassa punctata. Naples. 2. Amphilochus brunneus. Naples. 3. Leiicothoe spinicarpa. Arctic Ocean, North Atlantic, North Sea and Skagerrak, Greenland ; Norway, British Isles, Azores, France, Mediterranean. 4. Stenothoe marina. North Atlantic, North Sea, Adriatic Sea. 5. kS. valida. Rio Janeiro, Mediterranean ? 6. *Pariphinotus tuckeri. 7. Colomastix piisilla. British Isles, France, Mediterranean. 8. Panoploeopsis porta. 9. Eusiroides crassi. South Atlantic. 10. Pontogeneia verrilli. 1 1 . Melitafirsiielii. Rio Janeiro, Singapore, Port Jackson, N. S. Wales. 12. M. planaterga. 13. CcradocHs orchestiipes. Mediterranean. 14. C. parkeri. 15. C. colei. 16. Maera inaeqiiipes. Mediterranean, Azores. 17. M. raihbunae. Key West, Fla. 18. M. tinkerensis. 19. ElasmopHS rapax. British Isles, Christianiafjord, France, Azores, Mediterranean. 20. E. magnispinatus. 21. E. pocillimauus. Mediterranean, Atlantic coast of North America (Long Island Sound, Vineyard Sound;. 22. Gammarus breweri. 23. *Insula antennulella. 24. Orchestia platensis. Rio de la Plata, Atlantic coast of North America (Bay of Fundy to New Jersey), Mediterranean, Sea of Tiberias. 25. Hyale prevostii. Mediterranean, Atlantic Coast of North America, Rio Janeiro, Valparaiso, Peru. 26. H. ponlica. North Atlantic, North Sea, Mediterranean. 27. H. trifoliadens. 28. *Parhyalella batesoni. The Amphipoda of Bermuda. 5 29. MicrodeutopHs anomalus. Atlantic coast of Norway, Shetland Isles, Black Sea. 30. Autonoe longipes. Naples, Scandinavia, British Isles, Port Jack- son, N. S. Wales. 31. Eurystheus lina. 32. Podoceropsis sophia. Arctic Ocean, Scandinavia, British Isles, Shetland. 33. Isaea longipalpus. 34. Amphithoe longimana. New England coast. 35. A. nibricata. North Atlantic and adjoining seas of Europe. 36. A. pollex. 37. Grubia crassicornis. Naples, Black Sea. 38. G. coei. 39. Ericthonius brazilicnsis. Atlantic coast of North America, Nor- way, Adriatic Sea, Rio Janeiro, San Francisco, Cal. 40. Chelura terebrans. Atlantic coast of North America, Norway to Black Sea. 41. Caprella equilibra. Mediterranean, Norway, Charleston, N. Car., Rio Janeiro, Hong Kong, N. S. Wales. 42. C. bennudia. 43. C. danilevskii. Mediterranean, Black Sea, Copenhagen, Bay of Biscay, Sea of Japan, Port Jackson, N. S. Wales, Rio Janeiro. 44. Protellopsis stebbingii. Gulf of Mexico. 45. Cyatnus fascicularis. The specimens were all of relatively small size, the largest specimen measuring less than 20 mm. in length, which is in accord with previous observations that the Amphipoda of Arctic regions are of larger size than those of warm waters. The classification of the Gammaridea into families is in a rather unsatisfactory condition and no attempt at revision has been made in the following pages. Boeck (i876) divides them into 10 famihes and 22 subfamilies ; Stebbing (1888) in the " Challenger " Report makes 26 families and in his later work on the Gammaridea (1906) he recognizes 41 families; Delia Valle (1893) in his monograph re- cognizes only 10 families which, however, differ from Boeck's ; and Sars (1895) divides the Gammaridea of Norway alone into 26 families. For complete synonomy, reference should be made to the exten- sive works of Stebbing, Sars, and Delia Valle. Acknowledgment is made at this time of the privileges of the laboratory of the U. S. Bureau of Fisheries at Woods Hole, Mass. where part of this work was done in the summer of 1906. Tribe Gammaridea. Head rather small, not fused with first thoracic segment ; e3'es rarely of very large. size, usually compound, first antennae consisting of 3-jointed peduncle and flagellum ; second antennae with peduncle usually consisting of 5 joints and flagellum ; maxillipeds with inner plates free and with 2- to 4-jointed palps. Body usually compressed; thorax of 7 distinct segments, rarely reduced to 6 ; 5 or 6 segments bearing gills ; 4 segments in female bearing marsupial plates; thoracic legs overlapped at base by epi- mera, the first 4 being usually larger than the posterior 3. First 3 abdominal segments always free ; posterior 3 usually dis- tinct ; uropod 1 always biramous. Key to the genera of the Gammaridea. I Guathojjod 2 with tliuxl joint elongate .... Lysiauassa I Gnathopod 2 with third joint short .... 2 IGnathopod 2 with fifth joint greatly prolonged ; telson elongate, tapering, entire Amphilochus Not with same combination of characters . . 3 IGnathopod 1 with chela formed bj^ fifth and sixth joints Leucothoe Gnathoj)od 1 otherwise 4 Epimeron 4 enormously developed Stenothoe Epimeron 4 not especially large 6 Gnathopods 1 and 2 simple ; body depressed and ridged dorsally ; pleopod 3 with j)eduncle ex- panded to form long process Pariphinotus Not with same combination of characters . . G Gnathopod 2 with second joint rather slender and greatlj^ enlarged distally, gnathopod 1 ver3' small Colomastix Gnathopods otherwise 7 Epimera 1—3 tapering acutely ventrally .... Fanoploeopsis Epimera 1—3 more or less rounded ventrally . 8 Antennae with calceoli 9 Antennae without calceoli 10 10 1] 12 13 14 15 The Amphipoda of Bermuda. \ Antenna 1 with accessory flagellum Eusiroides \ Antenna 1 without accessory flagellum .... Pontogeneia Antenna 1 with accessory flagellum of more than 2 joints ; pereiopods 1 and 2 without glands ; uropod 3 projecting beyond others, biramous ; telson cleft 11 Not Avith same combination of characters . 15 \ Uropod 3 with raini'very unequal Melita \ Uropod 3 with rami not very unequal . . 12 Maxillae 1 and 2 with outer and inner plates very setose 13 Maxillae 1 and 2 with outer and inner plates not very setose 14 I Pleon segments 4—6 with dorsal spinules . . . Gammarus I Pleon segments 4—6 without dorsal spinules . . Ceradocus \ Pereiopods 3—5 slender Maera I Pereiopods 3—5 robust Elasmopus Antenna 1 with no accessor^^ flagellum ; mandible without palp ; pereiopods 1 and 2 without spinning glands ; uropod 3 small, uniramous 16 Not with tliis combination of characters . 19 Maxilliped with 3-jointed palp Insula Maxilliped with 4-jointed palp 17 Antenna 1 shorter than peduncle of 2 .... Orchestia Antenna 1 longer than peduncle of 2 . . 18 Maxilla 1 with palp Hyale Maxilla 1 without palp Parhyalella Antenna 1 with accessor^' flagellum well developod ; maxilla 1 with inner plate small ; pereiopods 1 19 I and 2 with spinning glands ; gnathopod 1 larger than gnathopod 2 20 Not with this combination of characters . 21 I Gnathopod 1 in male with fifth joint produced to form a large tooth Micro deutopus Gnathopod 1 in male with fifth joint not so produced Autonoe Antenna 1 with accessory flagellum ; low^er lip with anterior margin of outer plate entire ; 21 I pereiopods 1 and 2 with spinning glands ; uro- pod 3 not uncinate 22 Not with this combination of characters . 24 22 Telson emarginate Eurystheus Telson entire 23 23 I 24 25 26 B. W. Ktmkel, Pereiopods 1—5 not subchelate Podoceropsis Pereiopods 1—5 subclielate Isaea (Lower lip with anterior margin of outer plate in- cised ; pereiopods 1 and 2 with spinning glands ; uropod 3 uncinate 25 y Not with these characters 26 I Antenna 1 without accessory ilagellum .... Amphithoe 1^ Antenna 1 with accessory ilagellum Grubia Antenna 1 without accessory flagellum ; antenna 2 with Ilagellum not spatulate Ericthonius Antenna 1 with accessory flagellum ; antenna 2 with spatulate flagellum Chelura Lysianassa punctata (O. G. Costa, 1840), Stebbing, 1906. 1840. Caliisoma punctata. O. G. Costa, Fauna Reg. Napoli, Crost., Cat. p. 5. 1906. Lysianassa punctata. Stebbing, Das Tierreich, Lief. 21, p. 40. Eyes large, compound, reniform, ocelli large and not crowded together, pigmented in specimens preserved in alcohol. First antennae very short ; first joint of peduncle twice as long as second, third joint shorter than second ; principal flagellum made up of about 10 joints, about as long as peduncle ; accessory flagellum composed of 4 joints, about half as long as principal flagellum. Second antennae shorter than first and more slender ; flagellum shorter than peduncle, made up of 5 joints ; fourth and fifth joints of peduncle subequal ; third joint shorter than fourth. Mandibles with body rather slender ; cutting edge not denticulated ; palp long, 3-jointed, third joint slender and not quite as long as second, provided with several spinules apically ; molar tubercle wanting. Lower lip with inner plates small and rounded ; outer plates triangular, much longer than broad. First maxillae with inner plates very small ; outer plates with branched spines on distal margin ; palp made up of 2 joints, of which the first is very short and the second has a serrated, blunt distal end. Second maxillae with inner plate much broader than outer and of about same length, broader at distal end which is oblique and provided with spinules. Maxil- lipeds with 3-jointed palp having terminal dactyl-like spine ; second joint rather long and slender, with slender spinules on inner margin ; third joint with long spinules apically; inner plates with 3 teeth on round distal margin, fine cilia on inner margin ; outer plates moder- The Amphipoda of Bermuda. 9 ately broad, unarmed, extending nearly as far as second joint of palp. In female, lirst gnathopods with triangular epimeron, with anterior ventral angle rounded ; second joint fairly stout, cylindrical ; third joint broader than long; fourth triangular with posterior margin convex and provided with setae toward apex ; wrist somewhat longer than broad and provided with setae apically ; hand slender and Fig. 1. Lysianassa punctata (O. G. Costa). tapering, not subchelate, posterior margin provided with long setae and sharp tooth-like spines ; linger short and curved, unguiform. Second gnathopods with narrow epimeron more than twice as high as long, rhomboidal ; second joint long and very slender, slightly broader distall}' than proximally ; third joint 4 times as long as broad ; fourth joint about ^l^ as long as third, broader at distal end than at proximal, rounded apically, articulating with wrist by distal half of anterior margin ; wrist longer than third joint, triangular, broad- est at middle, posterior margin convex, anterior margin straight with many fine setae near middle ; hand shorter and narrower than wrist, subrectangular, broader at distal margin which is transverse and concave, anterior margin with abundant fine setae toward apical portion, distal portion of posterior margin with many closely set 10 B. IV. Kunkrl, sharp teeth ; finger very short and curved, not as long as width of distal end of hand. Pereiopods of usual form without spinning glands ; epimera rather high, third epimeron rectangular; fourth greatly elongated at in- ferior margin forming a posterior projection above which the an- terior margin of fifth epimeron fits ; fifth epimeron with inferior margin incised by deep split. Postero-inferior margin of third abdominal segment rounded, entire. Uropods, 3 pairs, biramous ; rami subequal, styliform and slender ; first pair projecting beyond second ; second projecting beyond ter- minal ; in first and second pairs rami and peduncle subequal ; ter- minal uropods short, with rami shorter than peduncle. Telson small, longer than broad, bearing apically a slight de- pression medially and a short toothlike spine on each side. There were only 2 females in the collection. The species has been recorded previously only from Naples. Amphilochus brunneus Delia Valle, 1893. 1893. Delia Valle, Fauna und Flora des Golfes von Neapel, vol. 20, p. 596; pi. 4, fig. 5 and pi. 29, fig. 1-15. Eyes circular, compound, made up of many ocelli closely packed together. Fig'. 2. Amphilochus hriinnetis Delia Valle. First antennae short, first and second joints of peduncle each about as broad as long and about ^/s as long as third which is about twice as long as wide; flagellum short and thick, composed of 8 or 9 segments, each of which is provided with a long and a short spine at distal margin. Second antennae slightly longer than first with moderately slender gland cone ; fourth and fifth joints of equal length, but fourth much thicker than fifth ; flagellum short and thick, about ^/s as long as peduncle, composed of 6 segments. The Ampliipoda of Bermuda. 1 1 Mandibles with slender 3-jointed palp, the third joint of which is longer than second, cutting edge expanded and divided into 7 teeth ; molar tubercle small, with no true triturating surface. First maxillae with inner plate small and Ijroad and bearing a single spine on apex ; outer plate narrow, moderately long, sides parallel to near distal end where plate tapers, inner margin of apex armed with about 12 broad, curved spines: palp 2-jointed, first joint as broad as long, second joint twice as long as broad, rounded at apex which is armed with a tooth and several spines. Second maxillae with inner plate narrow at base and inner edge olDlique and slightly convex ; outer plate narrow, somewhat longer than inner plate, bearing 3 or 4 spines on narrow apex and fine setules on inner margin. Maxillipeds with inner plate long and narrow, having lateral mar- gins parallel and with rounded apex provided with 2 toothlike spines, extending as far as apex of first joint of palp ; outer plate rather large, extending to middle of second joint of palp, oval in form, twice as long as wide, outer margin strongly convex, the distal portion of which bears many fine setae, inner margin distally serrate, proxi- mally bearing several submarginal spines, apex bearing large tooth and spine; palp 4-jointed, first joint longer than broad, with a few spines on outer distal corner and outer margin ; second joint rather narrower than first, slightly longer than broad, with a few spines on distal margin ; third joint about twice as long as wide and not more than half as wide as second joint, provided with spines on apex ; fourth joint clawlike, about ^/s as long as third joint. First gnathopods with oval epimeron, which is higher than long ; second joint long, more than 3 times as long as broad with a few setae on anterior margin and apex ; third joint not as long as broad armed with a few spines apically ; fovirth joint more slender than third, rounded apically, twice as long as broad, with fascicle of spines at apex ; wrist triangular, broader than long, articulating with anterior margin of fourth joint, posterior margin prolonged distall}' to form a triangular process which extends to the middle of the hand parallel to its posterior margin ; hand subtriangular, articulat- ing with wrist by apex, anterior margin slightly convex, palm also slightl}' convex and passing into posterior margin by obtuse angle, marked by 2 prehensile spines, finely serrate and armed with sub- marginal spines ; finger moderately strong, curved, slightly longer than palm, inner margin with fine teeth. Second gnathopods with epimeron 1^/2 times as high as long, ventral margin strongly convex ; second joint very long and slender, more than 4 times as long as broad ; third and fourth joints as in 12 B. IV. Kunkel, first gnathopods; wrist with posterior margin greatly elongated to form slender triangular process which extends as far as apex of posterior margin of hand, which is much larger than that of first gnathopods, more triangvilar in form with palm at right angles to axis of joint and ^/s as long as anterior margin, and finely serrate, and with prehensile angle provided with 2 stout spines ; finger long, curved, with fine teeth on inner margin. Uropods, 3, biramous ; terminal uropods extending beyond others, with outer ramus shorter than inner and somewhat shorter than peduncle which is slender. Telson slender, triangular, entire. The species was represented by several specimens about 3 mm. long from Flalts Village in sand from low water to 2 fathoms, and also from Castle Harbor in dead coral. Delia Valle recorded the species from the Gulf of Naples at 5 fathoms. Leucothoe spinicarpa (Abildgaard, J 789), Boeck, 1860. 1789. Gammarns spimcarpus. Abildgaard, in O. F. Miiller, Zool. Danica, vol. 3, p. 66; pi. 119, fig. 1-4. 1860. Leucothoe spinicarpa. Boeck, Bemaerk. norske Amphip. Forhandl. ved de Skand. Naturforsk., p. 654. Eyes compound, reniform, of medium size. First antennae scarcely ^/s as long as body, slightly longer than second ; peduncle about 2^/2 times as long as flagellum ; first joint moderately stout, cylindrical ; second of about same length but more slender; third joint hardly more than ^/4 as long as second and scarcely to be differentiated from first joint of flagellum which is short and composed of 8 or 9 segments ; accessory flagellum 1-jointed, rudimentary. Second antennae with short flagellum ; third joint of peduncle short, twice as broad as long ; fourth joint long and slender ; fifth joint about -/a as long as fourth ; flagellum about as long as last joint of peduncle and composed of about 7 segments. Mandibles without molar tubercle but with incisive plate well dentated and with numerous spines on spine row ; palp well devel- oped, first joint short, with small process on inner margin ; second joint long with spines on inner margin ; third joint somewhat longer than first and provided with a few spines on rounded apex. Lower lip with plates broad and rounded. First maxillae with inner plates small, triangular and with single spine on apex ; outer plates moderate with usual spines on oblique distal margin ; palp 2-jointed, somewhat longer than outer plate, armed apically with a few spines. Second maxillae The Amphipoda of Bermuda. 13 with outer plates curved, slender and longer than inner plates which are more or less tapering and provided with rather long spines on inner margin. Maxillipeds with inner plate rudimentary^ provided with 4 odontoid spines apically; outer plates likewise rudimentary, represented by small process bearing sharp spine ; palp 4-jointed, all of which are provided with slender spines on the inner and distal margins, first and second joints much wider distally than proximally Fig. 3. Leucothoe spinicarpa (Abildgaard). and subequal ; third joint somewhat club-shaped, about as long as preceding joint ; fourth joint in form of nail bearing single cilium on inner concave margin. First gnathopods with epimeron small, rhomboidal, having antero- ventral angle prolonged slightly ; second joint rather long and stout, and broadest at middle, with short spines on both anterior and posterior margins; third joint moderately long, ^twice as long as broad and broader distally than proximally ; fourth joint somewhat shorter than third and more slender; wrist large, oval, not much longer than broad but bearing by a prolongation of posterior margin a long slender, slightly curved spur which extends as far as distal U B. IV. Kunkel, end of hand and which forms a true chela with hand, anterior margin of spur provided with a few short ciha ; hand long and slender of nearly uniform width throughout, palm not marked off definitely from posterior margin ; finger slender and of usual form. Second gnathopods with oval epimeron longer than high ; second joint moderately long with anterior margin straight and provided with a few slender spines ; third joint about as broad as long ; fourth joint very short, somewhat cup-shaped with distal end broader than proximal ; wrist weak, bearing a long shell-hke process distally and posteriorly which is provided with many slender setae and into which the proximal portion of the hand fits ; hand oval, with posterior margin rather more convex than anterior, palm also convex, not dilTerentiated from posterior margin, bearing distally 3 or 4 tooth- like convexities, hand provided with fascicle of spines apically ; finger long and slender, curved and pointed. Epimera increasing in height to fourth ; third being shortest and terminating rather acutely ventrally ; pereiopods without spinning glands, ending in unguiform dactyls. Uropods, 3 pairs, biramous, first and third ]:)airs projecting be3'ond middle pair; rami subequal except in second pair where outer ramus is rather shorter than inner, more or less styliform ; peduncles of first and second equal respectively to rami in length ; peduncle of third pair rather longer than rami. Telson long and slender, triangular, tapering uniformly to acute apex, 3 times as long as broad, entire. Length 8 mm. Numerous specimens were present in the collection from Harring- ton Sound, from Flatts Village from low water to 2 fathoms, and from Castle Harbor W'here they were found in dead coral. The species is very widely distributed over the North Atlantic, being reported from the Arctic Ocean, Norway, the British Isles, the Azores, France, the Mediterranean. Sometimes it occurs in the l)ranchial sac of Ascidians. Stenothoe marina (Bate, 1857), Boeck, 1870. 1857. Moiitagua marina. Bate, Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. 2, vol. 19, p. 137. 1870. Stenothoe marina. Boeck, Forh. Videnskabs-Selsk. Chris- tiania, 1870, p. 139. Eyes large, compound, subtriangular. First antennae -/3 as long as body, peduncle short with first joint rather stout, tapering somewhat ; second joint slightly shorter than The Amphipoda of Bermuda. 15 first, cylindrical ; third joint short, hardl}' to be distinguished from first segment of flagellum, which is made up of about 20 segments which are longer than broad ; no accessory flagellum. Second an- tennae slightly shorter than first ; peduncle nearly as long as flagellum ; fourth joint somewhat longer than fifth. Mandibles rather broad, without palp and molar tubercle ; prin- cipal and secondary cutting edges denticulated ; numerous spines in spine row. First maxillae with inner plate small, triangular, furnished with single setule apically ; outer plate short, tapering slightly toward apex, with very minute setules on inner margin and 4 or 5 stout Fig. 4. Stenothoe marina (Bate). spines on apical margin ; palp stout, 2-jointed, with second joint rounded and provided with numerous teeth and spines apically, proximal joint only slightly shorter than second. Second maxillae with plates normally developed, but with inner plate having a single setule. Maxillipeds with inner plate reduced to a slight eminence and (Hiter plate entirely absent so that maxilliped appears to be made up of very small inner plate and a 5-jointed palp, of which all the joints are cylindrical except the terminal one which tapers to a slender point and bears fine cilia on the inner margin. In male, first gnathopods much smaller than second ; epimeron moderate in size ; second joint long and slender of uniform width throughout ; third joint cylindrical, slightly longer than broad ; fourth joint large, more or less cup-shaped with distal margin long and oblique and posterior margin, which bears a few spines, much longer 16 B. IV. Kunkel, than anterior; wrist triangular, about as broad as long, provided with spines on distal margin and posterior apex ; hand oval with distal portion more slender than basal portion and with palm long and oblique, very finely serrate and furnished with long slender spines and 4 prehensile spines , finger moderate with concave margin serrate. Second gnathopods with moderate epimeron which is higher than long with small tooth on postero-ventral angle ; second joint long and slender ; third joint cup-shaped and wider distally than proximally ; fourth joint much wider distally than proximall}' with posterior distal angle acute, articulating with wrist b}' anterior margin ; wrist triangular and broader than long, provided with a few spines on posterior apex ; hand oval, about twice as long as broad with palm long and oblique and bearing near middle a triangular process, also provided with spines and setae and 2 prehensile spines ; finger long and slender. Pereiopods with epimera large, that of fourth being largest; pereiopods slender, provided with unguiform dactyls and without spinning glands. Uropods, 3 pairs ; first extending beyond second which in turn extends beyond the third pair ; first and second biraraous, third with single ramus; rami styliform, subequal, and somewhat shorter than peduncle ; rami of terminal uropods stouter than others. Telson entire, triangular, longer than wide with lateral margins slightly convex and provided with 4 stout spines on each side. There was a single male specimen in the collection which measured about 3 mm. in length. The species has been recorded from the North Atlantic and North Sea and from the Adriatic at a depth of from 19 to 47 fathoms. Stenothoe valida Dana, 1853. 1853. Dana, U. S. Expl. Exped. vol. 13 II, p. 924, pi. 63, fig. 1. Eyes small, compound, reniform, situated between first and second antennae. First antennae moderately long and slender with fiagellum about twice as long as peduncle; first and second joints of peduncle cylindrical and subequal in length and each about as long as head, third joint less than ^j^ as long as second ; fiagellum made up of about 20 segments which are short proximally but become longer and more slender distally. Second antennae shorter than first in female (fiagel- lum broken off in single male specimen at hand) with gland cone small and inconspicuous, third joint cylindrical and slightly longer The Amphipoda of Bermnda. 17 than broad, fourth joint long and cyHndrical, fifth joint somewhat shorter than fourth; flagellum made up of about 17 segments, less than twice as long as peduncle. Mandibles without pal]) or molar tubercle, but with incisive plate moderate. First maxillae with ver}' small, triangular inner plate bearing single spine apically; outer plate rather broad and short, having 4 or 5 rather larger spine teeth on distal margin ; palp 2-jointed, first joint short, second joint rather large, about 3 times Y'm. 5. Stenothoe valida Dana. as long as first, rounded apically and provided with short setae on apex and inner margin. Maxillipeds with inner plates rudimentary and outer plates wanting; palps 4-jointed, rather long and slender, first joint rather short, slightly longer than broad, second joint longer than first, cylindrical, third joint clawlike and slender, as long as third. In male, first gnathopods rather small, with very small epimeron having a few setae on ventral margin, second joint long and slender ; fourth joint oblong with free anterior margin ver}- short and posterior Trans. Conn. Ac-id., Vol. XVI. 2 May, 1910. 18 B. fV. Kiinkel, margin forming an oval lobe which is provided with cilia posteriorly and spines distally, wrist triangular, shorter than fourth joint, with a few long spines on distal apical angle ; hand subrectangular rather narrow, with anterior and posterior margins parallel and with mo- derate palm somewhat oblique, serrated and provided a with few spines, prehensile angle bearing a few stout spines ; finger of usual form and moderate size. Second gnathopods with epimeron higher than long and with ventral margin rounded ; second joint moderately long and slightly curved ; third joint cylindrical, about twice as long as broad ; fourth joint longer than broad, with posterior margin convex and provided with about 6 rounded processes and a few short setae, wrist ex- ceedingly small, triangular; hand large, suboval, anterior margin convex, straight posterior margin, which serves as palm, provided with 2 strong processes near articulation of finger, palm provided with many slender setae ; finger long and very slender and rather strongly curved, with 2 slight processes near proximal end of con- cave margin. First pereiopods with moderate epimeron which is subrectangular and rather higher than long with ventral margin very finely serrate ; fourth joint rather broad with posterior margin straight and anterior margin convex and projecting distally to form rather strong triangular process ; fifth joint about as long as fourth, and more slender ; sixth joint rather longer than preceding with straight posterior margin provided with rather stout spines ; finger clawlike. Second pereio- pods with very large triangular epimeron, greatly expanded ventrally and with ventral margin gently rounded. Third pereiopods with second and fourth joints expanded ; third, fourth, and fifth pereiopods with very small epimera; all pereiopods closely resembling each other in distal segments. Uropods, 3 pairs ; first and second pairs biramous with rami styli- form ; third pair projecting slightly beyond the other two, with single 2-jointed ramus, not as long as peduncle, the distal one of which bears a blunt projection apically and is longer than the proximal. Telson triangular, rather prominent, entire, with 3 lateral spines on each side. Length 5 mm. The species was represented by a male and a female specimen. The female is much smaller than the male and differs from it principally in that the hand of the second gnathopod is broader and the palm is shorter and devoid of the 2 toothlike processes near the finger. The Ampliipoda of Bermuda. 19 The species has also been reported from Rio Janeiro and pos- sibly from the Mediterranean. Pariphinotus gen. nov. Body depressed and ridged dorsally. First and second antennae short ; iirst without accessory flagellum ; flagella of both short. Mandibles without molar tubercle or palp, principal cutting edge denticulated. Lower lip without inner plates. First maxillae with obsolete palp and without inner plates. Second maxillae with inner and outer plates coalesced except at apex. Maxillipeds with short, truncated inner plates not reaching as far as second joint of palp, apical margin with 3 sj^ine teeth ; outer plates broad and rounded, unarmed, extending nearly to distal end of second joint of palp which is moderate in size and made up of 4 joints, the terminal one of which is unguiform. Gnathopods simple ; epimera low. Third pleopods with 2 rami and with peduncle expanded to form arm-like process tipped with 3 coupling hooks. Uropods, 2 pairs, biramous. Telson semicircular, entire, thick. The genus is closely related to Iphinotus (Stebbing) but has only 2 pairs of uropods which are both moderately stout whereas in Iphinotus the first is slender and the second stout. Pariphinotus tuckeri sp. nov. Head provided with broad, square rostrum with rounded corners and with prominent lateral lobes which bear the large, prominent, compound eyes. Antennae short; first being slightly longer than second, with flagellum very short ; first antennae with first joint of peduncle much Ijroader distally than proximally and about as broad as long ; second joint about '^\^ as long as first and about ^2 as wide, with outer margin produced slightly distally ; third joint about ^/s as long as second, cylindrical in form ; flagellum short, about as long as second joint of peduncle, made up of 2 joints of which the terminal one is very short and the proximal one longer than last joint of peduncle, provided with setae distally. Second antennae with flagellum like that of first ; third joint of peduncle cylindrical, about as broad as long ; fourth joint twice as long as broad ; fifth about same length as fourth but narrower. Mandibles oblong with dentated cutting edges, 3 anterior teeth large, posterior ones small ; molar tubercle and palp absent, spine 20 B. JV. KnuM, row witli single spine. Lower lip without inner lobes but with ver}' broad outer ones. First maxillae without palp or inner plate ; outer plate armed on distal oblique margin with the usual forked, toothlike spines. Second maxillae with outer and inner plates coa- lesced except distall}' where a cleft separates the two ; apical margin with a few short setae. Maxillipeds with plates well developed and 4-jointed palp ; inner ]:)lates narrow, subrectangular, reaching scarcel}' as far as apex of first joint of palp, truncated, armed apically with 3 short spine teeth ; outer plates broad, reaching as far as middle of second joint of palp, inner margin straight, outer margin strongly Fig. 6. Fariphhiotxs ti'ckeri sp. nov. convex, armed only with single seta on inner apex ; palps with first joint twice as long as wide, second joint slightly longer than first with setae on inner margin, third joint cylindrical, as long as second, with a few setae on inner margin toward distal end, terminal joint slender, unguiform. In male, first gnathopods with large epimeron, produced slightly anteriorly ; second joint moderatel}'^ stout ; third slightl}^ longer than broad ; fourth slender, somewhat cup-shaped with posterior convex margin provided with several setae ; wrist triangular, about as broad as long with short posterior margin bearing a fascicle of setae ; hand simple, as long as fourth and fifth joints together, tapering slightly, distal posterior angle provided with stout spine and several setae ; finger stout and curved. The Amphipoda of Bermuda. 21 Second gnathopods with subrectangular epimeron higher than long, having rounded angles ; second joint short and stout becoming uniformly broader distally ; third joint slender, twice as long as broad ; fourth joint narrower and shorter than third with posterior margin convex and longer than anterior ; wrist, hand and finger as in first gnathopod. Epimera diminishing in height posteriorly, that of first pereiopod being slighth' lower than that of second gnathopod ; fourth joints rather broad, due to formation of lobe on anterior margin in an- terior group of appendages and on posterior margin in posterior group ; third, fourth, and fifth pereiopods with second and fourth joints broad ; sixth joints of all pereiopods provided with stout spine at apex. Second and third pleopods with both rami well developed and with peduncle bearing a stout prolongation medially which is pro- vided with 3 coupling hooks at apex. Uropods, 2 pairs, biramous; peduncle of both pairs cylindrical and extending to same distance posteriorly ; rami styliform with somewhat rounded apices, outer one much longer and broader than inner one ; outer margin of outer ramus of first with sparse setae, apex with single spine ; second uropods with rami slightly longer than those of first, both rami with outer margin very finely serrated and provided with apical spine. Telson semicircular, not extending as far as peduncles of uropods ; margin entire. Back provided with a rather conspicuous ridge ; abdomen rather small. No sexual dimorphism. Length 5 mm. The species was represented by a male and a female collected by Dr. W. G. VanName in 1901. Colomastix pusilla Grube, 1861. 1861. Grube, Ein Ausflug nach Triest und dem Quarnero, Berlin, 1861. Eyes small, round. First antennae short and stout, slightly longer than second ; ped- uncle, stout and nearly twice as long as head ; flagellum rudi- mentary, consisting of 3 ver\' short segments which are provided with rather long setae; first joint of peduncle slightly longer than either second or third, which are subequal in length, cylindrical 22 B. JV. Kiwkcl, and diminishing in thickness from first to third. Second antennae also with rudimentary flageUum ; third joint of peduncle rather stout and tapering very slightly ; fourth joint longer than third and more slender, slightly wider distally than proximally ; fifth joint C3lindrical and longer than fourth, with row of setae on lower margin. Epistome elongated in front, in form of slender cone. Upper lip large and strong with distal margin bilobed. Mandibles with elon- gated body, principal cutting edge divided into 5 long slender teeth which are serrated distally ; molar tubercle large, cyhndrical ; palp wanting. Lower lip apically broad, center prominent. First maxillae strikingly broad, inner plate wanting ; outer plater short with distal Fig. 7. Coloniastix pusilla Grube. margin provided with 3 odontoid spines ; palp 1 -jointed, curved to apex and terminating acutely so that inner margin of palp strikes against distal margin of outer plate, thus forming a true chela. Second maxillae formed of single plate, the distal margin of which is divided into 2 lobes, a small rounded one externally and a broader one medially, both of which are provided with setae. Maxillipeds very strongly developed ; inner plates fused on middle line to form slender triangular plate ; outer plates moderately broad but not very long, extending just beyond distal end of first joint of palp, inner margin smooth and unarmed ; palp 4-jointed, slender, with first two joints cylindrical and second joint slightly longer than first, third joint a little longer than preceding, rather fusiform with a few setae on inner margin, fourth joint clawlike and about as long as second joint. The Amphipoda of Bermuda. 23 In male, first gnathopods strongly atrophied, rudimentary ; epimeron triangular; second joint rather broader distally than proximally ; third joint rather longer than usual ; fourth, fifth, and sixth joints scarcely distinguishable, last joint forming very weak claw. Second gnathopods with strongl}^ developed hand ; epimeron more or less oval, not large ; second joint very slender at base but broaden- ing regularl}- to distal end where anterior margin is produced to form a rather large rounded lobe ; third joint small ; fourth much narrower than third with a distal triangular process ; wrist triangular, cuplike, not as long as broad, with short posterior margin provided with a number of setae ; hand suboval, about twice as long as broad, anterior margin convex, posterior margin about half as long as anterior, palm oblique and very irregular, bearing 3 deep rounded indentations and numerous setae of different lengths, anterior sub- margin and apex with several fascicles of setae ; finger rather stout and curved, of usual form. Pereiopods rather long and slender and subequal with epimera which are longer than high ; second joint long and slender ; third joint small ; succeeding joints elongated and subequal ; claws small. Pereiopods of posterior group with second joints slender in proximal half, strongly dilated in distal half; succeeding joints very similar to those of anterior pereiopods. Uropods, 3 pairs, biramous, all extending to about same distance posteriorly ; rami broad, styliform, slightly serrated on margins ; rami in all uropods subequal. Telson entire, suboval, rather longer than broad with apical margin very slightly indented. The species was represented by a single male specimen 4 mm. long. It has been reported from the Mediterranean and the British and French coasts. Panoploeopsis gen. nov. Posterior margins of posterior thoracic and anterior abdominal segments produced to form median dorsal teeth. Rostrum acute ; epimera 1—3 more or less acutel}^ tapering, fourth with posterior margin produced to form pointed process. Mandibles narrowl}' tapering to cutting edge, accessory plate narrow, no spine row, molar tubercle rudimentary, palp 3-jointed. Lower lip rather elongate, without inner plate and with anterior margins of outer plates entire. First maxillae with inner plate bearing setae on inner margin and apex, outer plate rather long and nar- 24 B. IV. Kunke/, row, palp 2-jointed, not reaching apex of outer plate. Maxillipeds with inner and outer plates long and narrow, outer fringed on distal part of outer margin, palp 3-jointed, first joint not as long as second and third together. First and second gnathopods very slender, hands simple. Pereio- pods 3—5 with second joint well expanded. Third uropods with narrowly lanceolate rami, not extending as far as others. Telson broadly incised at apex. The genus differs from Panoploea (G. M. Thomson) notably in the fact that the outer plates of the lower lip are not incised, in the shape of the second joint of the palp of the maxilliped and in the simple gnathopods. Panoploeopsis porta sp. nov. Eyes circular, compound, rather small, ocelli closely crowded together. Rostrum well developed, extending beyond first joint of peduncle of first antennae ; interantennal lobes prominent, triangular. First antennae shorter than second, with peduncle rather more than half as long as flagellum ; first joint cylindrical and longer than second which in turn is longer than third joint; flagellum slender, made up of about a dozen segments which are provided with nu- merous threadlike setules. Second antennae much stouter than first, second joint with long slender conical process on dorsal side extend- ing nearly as far as distal end of third joint which is slightly longer than broad ; fourth and fifth joints subequal, cylindrical ; flagellum about as long as last 2 joints of peduncle together. Upper lip very long and slender. Mandibles elongated and slender toward apex, cutting edge very long, divided into 6 very short teeth, the apical one being the longest ; secondary cutting plate very slender ; molar tubercle rudimentary ; palp 3-jointed, first joint slightly longer than broad and with rounded process apicalh', second joint long and slender, of uniform breadth throughout, third joint stouter and shorter than second, with a few short setae on inner margin and with outer margin slightly convex. Lower lip ver}- much elongated and very narrow, with no inner plates and with mandibular processes rather short and with inner margin of outer plate entire. First maxillae with very slender 2-jointed palp not extending as far as apex of outer plate which is rather narrow and triangular with distal margin very oblique, provided with the usual toothed spines; inner plate small, triangular, with setae on inner margin. Second maxillae very long and slender, outer plates longer The Amphipoda of Bermuda. 25 than inner and with outer and inner margins parallel; inner plate triangular. Maxillipeds with 3-jointed palp of which the first is slightly longer than the second and as long as the third which terminates subacutely ; outer plates moderately long with inner margin straight, outer margin convex and apex rather slender ; inner plates moderate, terminal margin transverse and armed with plumose spines. Fig. 8. Panoploeopsis pi>rta sp. nov. {Ep 4 is upmle down.) In female, first gnathopods with rather high epimeron, twice as high as long, triangular, with slight notch on anterior margin ; second joint moderately stout with long setae on anterior and on distal third of posterior margin; third joint slightly longer than broad; fourth joint about as long as third and slightly stouter; wrist slender, tapering toward distal end, about 3 times as long as broad ; hand more slender than wrist and longer, anterior and posterior margins nearly parallel, simple; finger short, curved, with concave margin divided into about 6 hooked teeth and with numerous setae. 26 B. IV. Kimkel, Second gnathopods with epimeron rather higher than that of first and more than twice as high as long, terminating acutely ven- trally : second joint moderately stout ; third joint about as broad as long; fourth joint about twice as long as broad with apex acutely pointed and with long slender setae on distal portion of posterior margin; wrist longer than hand and triangular with distal margin transverse and with anterior margin produced slightl}- distally ; hand simple, about as long as fourth joint, tapering slightly to distal end, provided with row of short setae on posterior margin ; finger short and stout with serrations and setae on concave margin. Epimeron of third pereiopod similar to that of second gnathopod ; that of fourth much higher and longer, terminating ventrall}- in acute angle and with posterior margin concave proximally to ac- commodate succeeding epimeron, and with acute process ventral to recess ; fifth epimeron longer than high with ventral margin bilobed ; seventh epimeron smaller than sixth, both suboval in form. Sixth and seventh thoracic segments and first 3 abdominal seg- ments more or less keeled and with posterior margin produced to a sharp process in mid-dorsal line. First and second abdominal seg- ments with lateral margins produced to form triangular lobes ; third abdominal segment with posterior margins of lateral portions pro- duced to form 2 stout, rather blunt projections. Uropods, 3 pairs, biramous, with rami styliform ; first pair extend- ing slightly be3^ond second and third pairs which extend to same distance ; peduncle of first pair longer than that of second and provided with row of sharp spines on dorsal margin, rami equal and as long as peduncle, each with terminal spine ; second pair similar to first but without spines on peduncle ; third pair with outer ramus shorter than inner, peduncle somewhat more than half as long as inner ramus. Telson about twice as long as broad, with apex divided into 2 triangular lobes whose apices are rather widely separated from each other. Length 7 mm. The species was represented by a single female collected b}- J. M. Jones. Eusiroides crassi Stebbing, 1888. 1888. Stebbing, Rep. Challenger, vol. 39, p. 977, pi. 90. Eyes moderately large, compound, reniform, pigmented. Antennae with calceoli on flagella ; first antennae moderatel}" slender, peduncle very short with first joint slightly longer than broad The Aniphipoda of Bermuda. 27 second joint slightly shorter and narrower, third joint shorter and narrower than second ; flagellum made up of about 15 segments, each of which is provided with setae on distal margin; accessory flagellum made up of 1 joint which is not as long as first joint of principal flagellum. Second antennae somewhat shorter than first; peduncle short, last 2 joints longest and subequal, about twice as long as wide ; flagellum scarcely as long as peduncle, composed of about 9 segments which are provided at distal ends with a few spines. Mandibles with 3-jointed palp and with principal cutting edge not denticulate ; secondary cutting edge divided into 4 slight, rounded teeth ; 3 spine teeth on spine row ; molar tubercle well developed ; third joint of palp longest, second joint rather broad. First maxillae with 2-jointed palp. Maxillipeds with plates normally developed ; Fig. 9, Eusiroides crassi Stebbiiig. inner plate rectangular, not as long as first joint of palp, inner margin with spine row with 4 or 5 spines ; molar tubercle prominent but not very robust. Lower lip with lobes widel}- separated ; inner plates very small ; mandibular processes short and rounded. First maxillae with elongated palp 2-jointed, second joint nearly twice as long as first with 4 or 5 spines on apex and 1 on outer margin at middle ; outer plate broad with 10 branched teeth on oblique distal end; inner plate small. Maxillipeds with 4-jointed palp of which the first joint is triangular, second joint articulating b}' inner margin and bearing 4 setae apically, second joint large, broader at distal end and with row of setae about distal margin and with inner margin denseh' covered with setae, third joint subrectangular, slightly 28 B. W. Kuukel, longer than broad and bearing 2 diagonal rows of setae on surface and with distal margin thickly set with long setae, not more than half as long as second joint, fourth joint unguiform, bearing 2 short setae on concave margin and nearly as long as third joint. In male, first gnathopods with epimeron moderate, ventral margin smooth, posterior margin provided with a spiniform tooth ventral to which are 2 submarginal spines ; second joint rather long and stout bearing a few long setae at distal end of anterior margin which is slightly concave ; third joint about half as long as wide with fascicle of setae on distal posterior angle ; fourth joint not as wide as third, about twice as long as wide, more or less rectan- gular with wrist articulating by anterior margin, the distal part of which bears 4 large spines, and posterior margin elongated to form a distal triangular lobe which bears 4 fascicles of setae ; wrist broader than long, with posterior margin strongly convex so that segment is broader than hand, posterior margin much shorter than anterior and bearing several fascicles of setae ; hand oval, smaller than that of second gnathopod, about twice as long as wide, with posterior margin continuous with palm and bearing about 9 fascicles of long flexible setae, palm oblique, and bearing 6 triangular processes which are accompanied by submarginal teeth and fascicles of setae, pos- terior margin very short ; finger long and stout, of usual form. Second gnathopods with epimeron higher than long with anterior and -posterior margins parallel and with ventral margin slightly convex and bearing a few short setae ; second joint longer than that of first gnathopod ; third, fourth, and fifth joints as in first gnathopod ; hand and finger more slender, but otherwise similar to first gnathopod. Pereiopods slender, provided with dactyls; last pereiopods as long as preceding ; epimera moderate, regularly convex ventrally. Postero-lateral margins of third abdominal segment not serrated. Uropods, 3 pairs, biramous ; first pair with long slender peduncle provided with 5 or 6 spines on inner margin and one on apex, rami also slender and styliform with inner one slightly longer than outer one, extending as far as extremities of terminal uropods, rami nearly as long as peduncle ; second uropods similar to first but with peduncle much shorter and with rami more tapering than in first, inner ramus rather stouter than outer and somewhat longer ; terminal uropods extending well beyond telson, with rami subequal, laminar, P/2 times as long as peduncle, both rami furnished with short setae and plumose spines on inner margin and 1 or 2 on outer margin. Telson laminar, triangular, slender, cleft -/a to base. In one of Tlie Ampliipoda of Bermuda. 29 the specimens at hand the right lobe was shorter than left and more rounded at apex. This may have been the result of injur}-. Each lobe with single spine near apex on outer margin. Length 8 mm. The species has been reported from the South Atlantic at a depth of about 500 fathoms. Pontogeneia verrilli sp. nov. Eyes compound, reniform, closely approximated dorsall}'. Antennae very elongate ; first slightl}' longer than second ; and about half as long as body, much more slender than second pair, Fig. 10. Pontogeneia verrilli sp. nov. peduncle rather short with joints increasing in length distally ; fla- gellum made up of many joints which are very short toward the base but become longer distally, provided with calceoli. Second antennae with peduncle slightly shorter than flagellum and with second and third joints very short, fourth and fifth joints subequal in length, at least three times as long as second and third together ; flagellum with joints very short. 30 B. W. KnnkeU Mandibles with 3-jointed palji of which the first is very short and broadens distally, second and third joints subequal but second much stouter, third joint tapering sHghtly and terminated by several slender spines ; cutting edges denticulated ; molar tubercle prominent ; several spines on spine row. Lower lip with outer plates large and widely separated, inner plates large and oval ; mandibular processes not large. First maxillae with inner plate oval and large, provided with single spine apically ; outer plate moderately slender with distal margin very oblique and armed in usual fashion ; palp long, 2-jointed, with second joint slender and tapering, with few spines on outer and inner margins and apex. Second maxillae with outer plate bearing single plumose spine apically and several simple ones on inner margin, rather slender and shorter than inner plate which is very broad and of oval form, with a few setae on inner margin. Maxillipeds with inner plates small and bearing 3 odontoid spines on transverse distal margin ; outer plates rather large with outer and inner margins parallel and with apical margin rounded, bearing long setae on inner margin; palp 4-jointed and provided with un- guiform spine apically ; third joint with many setae apically where it is broader than at base ; fourth joint with short setae on inner margin ; second joint provided with flat laminar process along entire inner margin which bears long slender setae. First gnathopods with subtriangular epimeron considerably higher than long; second joint moderately long and of uniform thickness, provided with group of spines at antero-distal angle : third joint short ; fourth joint subtriangular with setae along posterior margin ; wrist triangular, broader than long with setae on posterior margin ; hand moderate in size, longer than wrist, oval, palm long and slightly convex, passing into short posterior margin by even curve, provided with about 6 large conical teeth and long setae alternating with them, apex of hand with fascicle of setae ; finger long and slender. Second gnathopods very similar in shape and size to first; hand slightly more slender and palm provided with greater number of teeth. Epimera moderate ; pereiopods without spinning glands, with dactyls. Three anterior abdominal segments with postero-lateral margins serrate. Uropods, 3 pairs, biramous ; first and second with rami styliform and inner longer than outer and with both rami provided with spines, first extending slightl}' beyond second and third, peduncle of first rather longer than rami, that of second considerably shorter ; The Amphipoda of Bcmmda. 31 third pair with rami rather broader and lamellar, tapering to acute point, inner ramus larger than outer, provided with slender setae. Telson long and slender, twice as long as broad, cleft for ^/g of its length, each lobe provided apically with single spine, extending beyond peduncle of terminal uropod. Length 7 mm. This species was represented in the collection at hand by several specimens some of which were found in dead coral from Castle Harbor. Melita fresnelii (Audouin, 1876). 1876. Gaimnants fresnelii. Audouin, Descr. Egypte, vol. I, iv, p. 93, Crust, pi. 11, fig. 3. 1875. Melita fresnelii, Miers, Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, vol. 16, p. 75. Eyes compound, circular, deeply pigmented in alcoholic specimens. First antennae almost as long as body, longer than second an- tennae ; peduncle more than half as long as flagellum, with first joint cylindrical, second joint longer and more slender than first ; third joint very short; flagellum slender and made up of about 40 elongated segments ; accessory flagellum made up of 5 segments. Second antennae extending to about middle of first antennae with peduncle somewhat longer than that of first; gland cone long and slender, reaching nearly as far as end of third joint which is longer than broad ; fourth joint very long and slender ; fifth subequal to fourth in length ; flagellum rather long, made up of more than 14 segments. Mandibles strong with all parts well developed ; principal cutting edge denticulated ; numerous spines on spine row ; molar tubercle large and prominent; palp made up of 3 joints of which the first joint is short, second one moderately long, but shorter than the third and with setae along outer margin, third joint very slender, provided with many long setae on inner margin and apex. Lower lip with outer plates broad, rounded, and with anterior margin entire, inner plates moderate, mandibular processes short. First maxillae with inner plates slender and tapering, moderate, with 2 plumose spines on apex ; outer plates large and curved with usual branched spines on oblique distal margin ; palp 2-jointed with second joint broader apicall}^ and armed with spinelike teeth, apex of first joint provided with fascicle of setae. Second maxillae with oval plates, moderately broad ; outer plates with slender setae on rounded apex ; inner plates with slender setae on apex and inner margin and with an oblique row on outer surface. Maxillipeds with inner 32 B. W. KmikeL plates rectangular, extending beyond first joint of palp and provided with plumose spines on inner and distal margins and also on distal margin with 3 odontoid spines, and submarginally at inner distal angle with 2 conical toothlike spines; outer plates moderate in size, not extending as far as second joint of palp, inner margin straight, outer margin convex, passing over to distal margin by even curve, inner margin provided with toothlike spines which increase in length toward the apex and gradually become long and slender spines on Fig. 11. Melita fresnelii Audouin. distal margin ; palp 4-jointed, first joint sHghtly longer than broad, second joint slender, broadest proximal to middle, 3 times as long as broad, provided with numerous fascicles of slender setae, third joint short and curved, larger at distal end than at proximal, fourth joint curved and tapering, with apical spine and a few large setae on inner margin. In male, first gnathopods with small, rhomboidal epimeron ; second joint long and slender, provided with long setae on anterior and posterior margins ; third joint slender, slightl}^ longer than broad ; fourth joint small, broader distally and rounded, with fine cilia on posterior margin and with setae apically ; wrist long, triangular, 2^ 1 2 times as long as broad with 5 or 6 fascicles of setae on pos- terior and distal margins ; hand subtriangular, somewhat longer than The Aniphipoda of Bermuda. 33 broad and broader distally than wrist, palm nearly transverse, provided with setae on posterior and distal portion of anterior margins and palm ; finger stout and curved. Second gnathopods with small rhomboidal epimeron which is higher than long ; second joint rather long, extending well beyond epimeron ; third joint short ; fourth joint rather long with posterior margin convex and distal margin much longer than proximal ; wrist rather short with posterior margin prolonged to form cuplike pro- cess in which the posterior margin of the hand fits proximally ; hand very large and strong, broader distally, posterior margin pro- longed apically to form strong fingerlike process which tends to make the hand chelate, palm transverse and bearing 3 strong rounded processes near articulation with finger which is strong and not greatl}' ciu^ved, except at apex where it closes past the fingerlike process of the hand, and which is broadest at middle. In female, first gnathopods with quadrilateral epimeron having posterior margin forming a small triangular process and with ventral margin provided with setae and cilia ; second joint long and slender with 5 fascicles of setae on posterior margin and numerous longer setae on distal ^/s of anterior margin ; third joint slightly longer than broad ; fourth somewhat longer than third with anterior margin \:ery short and posterior margin long and provided near distal end w-ith many very fine cilia and several stoiit setae ; wrist longer than hand and as broad as hand, provided on posterior margin with numerous short setae which form a close set mass, and also with a few longer pectinate spines on posterior margin and nu- merous fascicles of setae near margin ; hand subrectangular, less than twice as long as broad with posterior margin provided with many setae of different lengths, some of which are finely pectinate, palm finely serrate and armed with short submarginal spines, an- terior margin with 4 fascicles of setae ; finger of usual form having 2 curved spines on outer convex margin and with several short slender ones on concave margin. Second gnathopods slightly stouter than first, with epimeron very similar to that of first but slightly higher; fourth segment with posterior margin prolonged to form a triangular process and provided with a few long setae ; wrist quite similar to that of first gnatho- pod but larger, posterior margin furnished with fascicles of slender setae among which are a few finely pectinate ones ; wrist as long- as hand which is subrectangular, palm oblique with rounded prom- inence near articulation with finger, finely serrate, furnished also with numerous submarginal setae and with 3 prehensile spines, Trans. Conn. Acad., Vol. XVI. 3 May, 1910. 34 B. IV. Kimkel, anterior and posterior margins each with 6 fascicles of setae ; finger strongly serrate and provided with 2 fascicles of setae near middle of outer convex margin. Pereiopods with moderate epimera and with normal dactyls and no spinning glands. Abdominal segments with ventral margins of anterior 3 prolonged posteriorly, first 2 to form simple triangular processes, third with ventral margin very much longer to form a slender process posteriorly; dorsal portion of posterior margins of abdominal segments deeply serrated to form 5 to 7 acutely pointed teeth. Uropods, 3 pairs, biramous ; first pair extending slightly beyond second, rami styliform, inner one longer than outer, peduncle slender, cylindrical, about as long as inner ramus, rami provided with spines on inner margin and apex ; second pair similar in form to first but shorter ; terminal uropods extending considerably beyond others, inner ramus rudimentary, outer ramus long and slender, more or less flat, about twice as long as peduncle, provided with fascicles of setae on outer and inner margins and apically. Telson triangular, slender, lamellar, cleft -'/i to base with lobes rather dehiscent, provided with several sharp spines on outer margin and at apex, somewhat longer than broad. Length 6 mm. Numerous specimens were at hand which were found at Flatts Village, in sand from low water to 12 feet; in Castle Harbor, among dead corals ; and in Harrington Sound. The species has been found on the coast of Brazil, Rio Janeiro, at Singapore at a depth of 9 feet, and according to Haswell it is very common at Port Jackson, New South Wales. Melita planaterga sp. nov. Eyes round, small, compound, deeply pigmented, situated well ventrally between first and second antennae. First antennae long and slender, about -^/j as long as body ; ped- uncle as long as flagellum ; first joint of peduncle stout, more or less fusiform, second joint cylindrical and somewhat longer and more slender than first; third joint short, not more than ^3 as long as second; principal flagellum made up of about 18 slender segments; accessory flagellum short, 2-jointed. Second antennae somewhat shorter than first, but peduncle longer than that of first, wich fla- gellum made up of al^out 7 segments and about as long as last 2 joints of peduncle, third joint of peduncle about as long as broad, fourth and fifth .sub-(|u:il in length, gland cone rather long and slender. The Auiphipoda of Bermuda. 35 Upper lip with small median emargination. Mandibles with dentate cutting edges, prominent molar tubercle and slender 3-jointed palp, the second joint of which is the longest and the terminal joint of which tapers slightly and is a little shorter than second. Lower lip with inner plates distinct. First maxillae with numerous setae on inner plate and with outer plate armed in the usual way ; palp 2-iointed with terminal joint broadened and rounded distally and armed with toothlike projections and setae. Maxillipeds with plates well developed and with 4-jointed palp ; inner plates subrectangular, Fig. 12. Melita pla?iaterga sp. nov. long, extending nearly to middle of second joint of palp, distal margin transverse and provided with numerous setae ; outer plates large, with outer and distal margins convex, inner margin straight and provided with spine teeth which become long and slender apically ; second joint of palp 3 times as long as wide, cylindrical, third joint about ■% as long as second, broader distally than proximally and bearing a rounded triangular process at middle of inner margin, rounded apex ciliated, fourth joint long and slender, unguiform. In female, first gnathopods with oval epimeron, higher than long with ventral margin somewhat convex and provided with fine setae ; second joint very long and slender with setae on both anterior and posterior margins; fourth joint short, posterior margin strongly convex 3(5 B. ir. KnukcL and provided with tine cilia and a few long setae ; wrist triangular, twice as long as wide and longer than hand, anterior margin and distal portion of posterior margin parallel and with a few setae ; hand subchelate, subrectangular, with palm transverse, about twice as long as broad ; finger short and strongly curved. Second gnatho- pods with epimeron rather higher than first ; second joint long and slender with numerous long setae on posterior margin and smaller number on anterior ; fourth joint longer than third with postero- distal angle slightly produced ; wrist triangular, nearly as broad as long, with dense setae on posterior margin and very long ones on anterior; hand oval. In male, first gnathopods like female exce])t that the wrist is much longer and the hand is broader at distal than at proximal end because of rounded lobelike process on posterior margin ; palm very con- vex, bearing a rather marked rounded incision near hinge ; finger short, thick, and somewhat curved. Second gnathopods with rounded epimeron which is higher than long ; second joint moder- atel}^ stout and with a few long setae on posterior margin ; fourth joint about twice as long as bi'oad with posterior margin somewhat produced to acute point ; wrist triangular with posterior margin somewhat rounded and produced distally and provided with a series of transverse rows of setae ; anterior submargin also with rows of setae ; hand oval, nearly twice as long as broad with anterior and jDOsterior margins of nearly equal con vexity and provided with numerous fascicles of setae, palm provided with many long slender setae, rather convex and passing into posterior margin by even curve ; finger rather long and stout and not greatly curved, capable of closing past palm. Epimera of moderate size, fourth one largest, emarginate pos- teriorly ; pereiopods slender and increasing in length posteriori}', the last 2 being subequal ; second joints of third to fifth pereio]->ods well expanded with posterior margins finely serrate. Abdominal segments with posterior margin smooth, third segment with postero- lat3ral margins entire. Uropods 3 pairs, biramous ; hrst and second pairs with lanceolate rami provided with a few stout setae on outer margin and fascicle of setae at apex ; third uropods with inner ramus small, outer ramus greatly elongated and rather foliaceous, with margins slightly convex and apex blunt, provided with stout setae on both margins and apex. Telson as broad as long, cleft to Ijase, each lobe l^earing triangu- lar process distally and several setae, Leniith 9 mm. The Auiphipoda of Bermuda. 37 The preserved specimens were marked with irregular chocolate brown bands on posterior margin of body segments, the bands on the tirst 3 abdominal segments being especially 1)road ; the telson, ]:)eduncles of uropods, and of antennae were marked with very minute brown spots and the proximal joints of pereiopods bore irregular longitudinal brownish lines. The specimens were collectf^d in a brackish pond near Flatts \'illage. Ceradocus orchestiipes A. Costa, 1853. 1853. A. Costa, Rendic. della Soc. Reale Borbon., Ace. delle Sci., NapoH, n. sen, vol. 2, p. 177. Eyes compound, large, round. First antennae about •''/4 as long as body ; peduncle rather long but shorter than flagellum, tirst joint moderately stout, cylindrical, second joint slightly longer than hrst, third joint rather short and slender; flagellum made up of 22 or more segments, the first of which is scarcely to be distinguished from terminal joint of ])ed- uncle ; secondary flagellum made up of 5 segments. Second an- tennae shorter than first, flagellum rather short ; gland cone rather long and slender, extending beyond distal end of third segment which is about twice as long as broad, fourth segment slightly longer than fifth, rather long and slender ; flagellum made up of about 9 joints, al^out equal in length to last joint of peduncle. Mandibles with all parts well developed ; palp 3-jointed, first joint moderately long, broader 'at apex and bearing sharp spinelike pro- cess at inner distal corner, second joint longest, tapering slightly toward distal end and bearing 4 long setae on inner margin ; third joint about ^/2 as long as second with slender rounded apex which bears several long setae and is also provided with 2 setae on inner margin and 1 on outer ; principal cutting edge divided into 2 rounded teeth ; secondary cutting edge broad, made up of 4 equal teeth ; 7 plumose spines on spine row ; molar tubercle moderate. First maxillae with 2-jointed palp, second joint longer than proximal joint and broader at apex which is provided with numerous spines ; outer plate large, with 6 or 7 branched and pectinate spines on oblique distal margin ; inner plate broad, triangular, with inner margin provid- ed with row of long plumose spines. Second maxillae of usual form, plates oval, subequal ; outer plate with apex provided with setae ; inner plate with setae on inner margin as well as apex. Maxillipeds with plates well developed ; inner plate with apex truncate and outer and inner angles prolonged to form toothlike processes, apical 38 B. IV. KunkcL margin with man\' plumose spines; outer plate extending almost as far as second joint of palp with inner margin provided with toothlike spines which become longer toward rounded apex; palp with first joint slightly longer than broad, second joint very long and moderately slender having slender setae on inner margin, third joint short, with distal end larger than proximal ; fourth joint with slender terminal spine as long as joint itself. \\\ male, first gnathopods with epimeron triangular, small : second joint moderately stout with short setae on anterior margin and sev- eral very long ones on posterior margin; third joint short with group of moderately long setae near distal end of posterior margin ; Fig. 13. Ceradocus orchestiipes A. Costa, fourth joint more or less rectangular with 4 fascicles of setae on posterior margin and group of setae on distal margin, both anterior and posterior margins produced distally to form small triangular processes ; wrist very large, triangular, longer and broader than hand, posterior margin very convex and provided with many long setae which also are present on distal margin, anterior margin with 4 quite long setae; hand more or less oval with palm oblique and about as long as posterior margin which bears many setae, palm provided with numerous setae ; finger of usual form moderately stout. Second gnathopods with rectangular epimeron slightly higher than long; second joint short and stout with 2 long setae near proximal end of posterior margin and 1 at distal end and 1 near distal end The Amphipoda of Bermuda. 39 of anterior margin ; third joint short ; fourth about twice as long as broad, subrectangular ; wrist small, triangular, broader than long with many long setae on convex posterior margin ; hand very large, subrectangular, twice as long as broad, with palm oblique and hav- ing moderately deep notch near middle, prehensile angle with stout spine, palm provided with numerous submarginal setae, posterior margin with 6 fascicles of setae and apex with 5 or G long setae ; finger curved, stout and of usual form. Pereiopods with epimera of moderate size, of usual form and provided with dactyls but no spinning glands. Uropods .3 pairs, biramous ; first extending slightly be3'ond second, rami cylindrical, inner one slightly longer than outer, peduncle ^/s longer than rami, provided with sharp spines on inner margin ; second uropods of essentially same form as first but with peduncle much shorter so that rami are slightly longer than peduncle ; terminal uropods reaching much beyond the others, rami very long, equal, laminar, finger with spinules, apices narrowly truncate. Telson flat, slightly longer than broad, with lobes widely separated, cleft ^/a to base ; each lobe terminating in long acute process and bearing 2 long stout spines side by side on inner margin near apex. Length 6 mm. The species was represented by a number of specimens some of which were found in sand at Flatts Village from low water to 2 fathoms. The species has been reported previously only from the Medi- terranean. Ceradocus parkeri sp. nov. Eyes, small round, compound. First antennae long and slender, about 1/3 as long as bodj-, with rather long ]ieduncle, about 1^2 times as long as flagellum which is made up of about 20 segments which are provided with long setae; accessory flagellum half as long as principal flagellum, made up of 6 or 7 segments ; peduncle with first 2 segments cylindrical and equal in length, third joint less than 1/5 as long as second and narrower. Second antennae about ■'/s as long as first, with short flagellum made up of about 8 short segments, slightly shorter than last joint of peduncle, which in turn is about '^/a shorter than the fourth and is provided with setae on the lower margin, fourth joint cylindrical, with setae on lower margin, third joint about 3 times as long as broad, gland cone small and applied closely along lower margin of third joint. 40 B. W. KunkeL Mandibles with principal and secondary cutting edges dentated and with numerous spines on spine row, molar tubercle robust ; palp 3-jointed, with first joint rather short, second joint long and slender with row of long stiff setae on inner margin, third joint shorter and more slender than second with several very long setae on inner margin toward apex which is rather acute. Lower lip with inner plates broad and rounded, outer plates broad with entire margins, mandibular processes short and stout. First maxillae with 2-jointed palp, inner plate triangular with many setae on iimer margin. Second maxillae with plates having apices rounded, outer plate larger than inner, both provided with setae on distal end. Maxillipeds with 4- jointed palp, the first joint of which is about as long as broad, the second is long and slender, cylindrical with setae on inner margin, Fig. 14. Ceradocus fcirkeri sp. nov. the third is less than 1/2 as long as the second with the distal end rather broader than proximal and provided with setae on rounded apex, and the fourth joint is conical with a stovit spine apicall}' ; outer plate rather well developed, extending nearly as far as apex of second joint of palp with outer margin rounded and inner margin provided with broad toothlike spines which become longer toward apex ; inner plate moderate, rectangular, with distal margin trans- verse and provided with a few plumose spines and bearing trian- gular process on outer distal angle. In male, first gnathopods with moderate epimeron, having antero- ventral angle prolonged slightly and provided with several spinules ; second joint rather long, slightly broader distally than proximally and with a few setae on posterior margin ; third joint short ; fourth joint rather longer than broad, subrectangular, with rounded apex The Ampliipoda of Bermuda. 41 bearing- fascicle of setae ; wrist rather large and subtriangular, twice as long as wide, with many fascicles of setae on posterior margin and on lateral surface, and stout spines on apex ; hand shorter than wrist but about as wide, subrectangular with distal end wider than proxi- mal and with palm slightly oblique, finely serrate and provided with short setae, posterior margin provided with 4 or 5 fascicles of long stout setae, prehensile spine present, anterior margin slightly convex and provided with 4 or 5 fascicles of setae ; finger moderately stout and curved with few fine setules on concave margin. Second gnathopods wdth subrectangular epimeron about as broad as long, with ventral margin provided with a few setae ; second joint very stout with 2 long spines on j^roximal third of posterior margin and numerous fine setae on anterior margin and 2 short stout setae on anterior distal apex ; third joint broader than long ; fourth, sub- rectangular, twice as long as broad with single seta on postero-distal apex ; wrist triangular, about as broad as long ; hand stout, subrect- angular, slightly broader distally than proximally, palm slightly oblique, provided with setae, prehensile angle produced to form curved toothlike process and provided with prehensile spine, posterior margin with about 8 fascicles of setae, anterior submargin with about 4 fascicles ; finger of usual form, stout. Epimera of moderate size ; pereiopods of moderate size and pro- vided with clawlike fingers. First 3 abdominal segments with posterior and lateral margins entire and rounded. Uropods, 3 pairs, biramous ; rami of first 2 pairs styliform and subequal, with large .spines apically ; third uropods with rami much longer than peduncle and somewhat flattened, outer ramus longer than inner, with rather long spines on outer margin and apex, inner ramus with long spines apicall}'. Telson subrectangular, about as broad as long, divided to base, each lobe with several long stout spines on inner apex. Length, 6 mm. The species is represented by a single male specimen. Ceradocus colei sp. nov. First antennae slender, longer than second, about half as long as body ; peduncle about -/s as long as flagellum which is made up of nearly 20 segments ; first joint of peduncle swelling somewhat in thickness at middle, about 3 times as long as broad, provided with a few setae, second joint longer and more slender than first and provided with setae, third joint small, scarcely to be distinguished 42 B. W. Kunkel, from proximal joints of principal flagellum ; accessory flagellum short, 2-jointed. Second antennae with flagellum about as long as last 2 joints of peduncle, made up of 8 or 9 elongated segments ; gland cone rather stout and prominent, third joint slightly longer than broad, fourth joint cylindrical and about as long as first joint of peduncle of first antennae, fifth joint longer and more slender than fourth, both fourth and fifth joints with slender setae. Mandibles as in C. parkeri. First maxillae with 2-jointed palp, of which the first is short and the second more or less clubshaped with short spines on rounded apex ; outer plate slightly tapering in form, with usual spine teeth on distal margin ; inner plate some- what rounded with numerous setae on inner margin. Maxillipeds Fig. 15. Ceradocus colei sp. nov. with 4-jointed palp and outer and inner plates well developed ; first joint of palp short, cylindrical, second joint cyhndrical and about 2^2 times as long as broad, third joint slightly thicker distally than proximalty, about twice as long as wide and of about the same thickness at widest part as second, provided with spines and cilia at apex, fourth joint clawlike, curved, with short setae on inner margin ; outer plate extending as far as apex of second joint of palp with inner margin straight and provided with abundant setae, outer margin and apex convex ; inner plates extending scarcely to middle of second joint of palp, apex truncated and provided with short setae which become more slender and extend along distal half of inner margin. In female, first gnathopods with moderate rhomboidal epimeron The Amphipoda of Bermuda. 43 having anterior ventral angle somewhat produced anteriorly ; second joint rather long and slender with margins parallel and with anterior margin having several long setae near proximal end and group of shorter ones at distal end, posterior margin with group of setae at distal end ; third joint small, with few setae on posterior margin near distal end ; fourth joint broader distally than proximally, with posterior margin especially strongly convex toward distal end and provided with a fascicle of rather long setae apically and ciliated for '^\x of its length ; wrist Vs longer than hand, somewhat over Vs as broad as long, of uniform wadth throughout except at proximal end where articulation with fourth joint is oblique, anterior margin with fascicle of pectinate spines at anterior apex, posterior margin with 6 or 7 fascicles of setae, some of which are pectinate, surface of wrist with several groups of setae ; hand subrectangular, slightl}^ narrower at proximal end than at distal end and narrower than wrist, anterior margin slightly convex and provided with several fascicles of setae, posterior margin with several groups of setae, palm transverse, slightly convex with submarginal setae toward posterior margin ; finger of usual form, extending as far as prehensile angle of hand. Second gnathopods with epimeron twice as high as long with ventral margin evenly rounded ; second joint moderate with long setae on posterior margin and a few near distal end of anterior ; fourth joint with posterior margin elongated to form triangular pro- jection ; wrist triangular, about 1^3 times as long as broad, with an- terior and posterior margins provided with numerous fascicles of setae ; hand suboval, somewhat longer than wrist and of same width, anterior margin twice as long as posterior, with numerous fascicles of setae, posterior margin with long setae, passing into oblique convex palm liy even curve, prehensile angle with several stout setae, palm provided with setae of various lengths ; finger moderatel}' long and curved with setae on middle of convex margin. Pereiopods and epimera as in C. parkeri. Third abdominal seg- ment with postero-lateral angle prolonged somewhat posteriorly, posterior margin entire. Uropods, 3 pairs, biramous ; rami of first and second styliform, those of first pair extending beyond second ; third pair long and rather flattened. Telson subrectangular, about as long as broad, divided to base, each lobe somewhat acutely pointed and provided with group of several setae of different lengths. Length 5 mm. There was a single female specimen in the collection. 44 B. IV. Knukcl, Maera inaequipes (A. Costa, 185 Ij, Stebbing, 1906. 1851. Amphithoe inaeguipes, A. Costa, Cat. Crost. Ital., p. 45. 1906. Maera inaequipes, Stebbing, Das Tierreich, Lief. 21, p. 435. Eyes small, rounded, compound, deeply pigmented in alcoholic specimens. Interantennal lobes rather prominent and rounded. First antennae about ^,'2 as long as body, slender, peduncle longer than flagellum, second joint rather longer than first which tapers slightly; third joint very short; flagellum made up of about 18 seg- ments gradually increasing in length distally; accessory flagellum long, made up of 7 segments, more than half as long as principal flagellum. Second antennae extending to about middle of flagellum Fig. 16. Maera inaequipes (A. Costa). of first ; peduncle about as long as that of first antennae ; gland cone rather long and acutely pointed, extending to middle of next segment; third joint more than ^2 as long as fourth which is the longest and is very slender ; fifth joint about •^/4 as long as fourth ; flagellum about as long as fourth joint of peduncle, consisting of about 10 segments. Mandibles triangular, with all parts well developed ; palp 3-jointed, third joint longest, tapering somewhat in form ; second joint slightly shorter than third, about 3 times as long as broad, cylindrical ; first joint longer than broad ; principal and secondary cutting edges both denticulated, secondary plate rather broad ; molar tubercle very large, 5 or 6 spines in spine row. Lower lip broad, having anterior margin of outer ])lates incised ; inner plates large ; mandibular The Auipliipoda of Bermuda. 45 processes elongate. First maxillae with 2-jointed palp having proximal joint broader apically, distal joint about 3 times as long as broad, rounded apically and bearing a number of setae at apex ; outer plate not reaching to middle of second joint of palp, with truncated apical margin which bears about 8 branched and furcate spines ; inner plate small, triangular, bearing about 4 plumose spines apically. Second maxillae with oval plates having apices rounded ; outer plate slightly longer and broader than inner one. Maxilli])eds with 4-jointed palp and well developed plates ; second joint of palp rather, long about 3 times as long as broad, third joint about twice as broad as long with rounded apex, fourth joint conical, armed with terminal claw nearly as long as segment itself; outer plate oval, extendmg about -/a to distal end of second joint, provided with odontoid spines along inner margin which become longer toward apex and on the broad distal margin ; inner plate rectangular having plumose spines on distal margin which bears a small triangular process at outer corner and a single toothlike spine apically and externally. In female, first gnathopods with small epimeron produced to form acute angle anteriorly, ventral margin slightly notched and provided with fine setae ; second joint of moderate proportions with long setae on posterior margin ; third joint longer than broad, bearing group of setae on posterior margin ; fourth joint rectangular, bear- ing rounded process on postero-distal angle, distal end provided with row of short setae and a number of longer ones ; wrist very long, as long as hand, triangular, articulating with anterior margin of fourth joint, anterior margin indented slightly near distal end, posterior margin provided with 8 or 9 fascicles of setae and bear- ing, proximal to articulation of hand, a row of pinnate spines ; hand rather small, regularly oval, posterior margin more convex than anterior, palm oblique passing by even curve into posterior margin, with short submarginal setae and several fascicles of longer setae and 3 prehensile spines ; finger rather long and curved. Second gnathopods with small rhomboidal epimeron having setae on antero-ventral margin ; second joint of same form as that of first with long slender setae on anterior margin at proximal and distal ends; third joint short; fourth rectangular, as in first; wrist very small, triangular, with lobe on free posterior margin which is rounded and provided with numerous fine setae ; hand very large and oval, twice as long as broad and broader than wrist, palm variable in character but moderately long, often with 3 rounded processes near articulation with finger and provided with numerous submarginal setae of various lengths, and with posterior margin produced to 46 B. IV. Kiuikel, form triangular process behind \\hich the extremit}' of finger fits ; finger very long and strong. (Palm usually transverse and with rounded notch in the middle; in one specimen the hands on the 2 sides were quite different.) Gnathopods of male quite similar to those of female. Pereiopods of moderate length, those of posterior group being rather stout and fourth and fifth being subequal, all furnished with tricuspidate dactyls ; epimera of moderate size, subrectangular ; third to fifth pereiopods with second joints moderately expanded, posterior margin produced slightly distally. Uropods, 3 pairs, biramous ; first pair with moderately long ped- uncle, bearing stout spines on outer margin, inner ramus slightly longer than outer; second uropods shorter than first, extending posteriorly about as far as first pair ; third pair of flattened form, extending scarcely beyond others, peduncle short, rami with truncated apices, provided with fascicles of setae on outer margin and apex of outer ramus which is rather broader and longer than inner. Telson longer than broad divided nearly to base, lobes widely dehiscent ; each lobe terminating in triangular point bearing small toothlike process at base of outer margin, and accompanied by toothlike spine. Third abdominal segment with postero-lateral corners not serrate. Length 7 to 8 mm. The species was represented by numerous specimens which were rather variable. Specimens were collected at Flatts Village in sand from low water to 2 fathoms, in dead coral in Castle Harbor, in corallines from Bailey Bay, and in Harrington Sound. It has been previously recorded from the Mediterranean and the Azores. Maera rathbunae Pearse, 1908. 1908. A. S. Pearse, Proc. U. S. National Mus., vol. 34, p. 29. Eyes round, small, compound, deeply pigmented. First antennae longer than second, with peduncle longer than flagellum, first joint rather stout, slightly tapering in form, second joint very slender, longer than first; third joint short, hardly to be tlistinguished from first joint of principal flagellum, which is made up of about a dozen segments ; accessory flagellum as long as first 7 segments of principal flagellum, composed of many joints. Second antennae with rather short flagellum, about as long as fourth joint of peduncle, made up of 8 segments; gland cone prominent, ex- tending nearly to end of third joint of peduncle ; fourth joint slightly longer than fifth, and like the fifth provided with long setae. The Amphipoda of Bermuda. 47 Mandibles with all parts well developed, palp 3-jointed, the ter- minal joint of which is bluntly styliform, shorter than second and provided with long setae on inner margin. First maxillae with 2- jointed palp of uniform thickness throughout and with apex rounded and provided with short setae ; outer plate of usual form with forked and branching toothlike spines on oblique distal margin ; inner plate Pig. 17. Maura rathbunae Pearse. triangular, of moderate size, with 4 setae on apex. Second maxillae with subequal, oval plates having setae on distal margins. Maxillipeds with 4-jointed palp and well developed plates ; inner plate subrectan- gular, extending somewhat beyond lirst joint of palp with outer margin slightly convex and with distal margin armed with plumose .spines ; outer plate rather large, armed with setae on inner and distal margins, oval, extending nearly as far as second joint of palp which is the longest und cylindrical ; third joint about ^/a as long 48 B. W. Kunkel, as second and slightly long-er than first ; fourth joint clawlike, about as long as third. In male, tirst gnathopods with suboval epimeron and moderately slender second joint which bears several long setae on posterior margin ; third joint short ; fourth joint slightl}- longer than broad with numerous setae on rounded apical margin ; wrist rather large and triangular, more than twice as long as broad, with posterior margin well rounded and with distal margin provided with numerous setae, anterior margin produced to form a triangular process ; hand about as wide as w^ist but not so long, suboval in form, posterior margin more convex than anterior margin and passing into oblique palm by an even curve, palm slightly irregular in contour and provided with setae of various lengths ; finger moderately long and slender. Second gnathopods with small, subrectangular epimeron; second joint fairly short and third joint a little longer than broad; fourth smaller than third with anterior margin much longer than posterior ; hand very large, subtriangular in form with base of triangle form- ing palm, posterior margin produced to form a triangular process, palm very irregular in contour, more or less incised in posterior half and with rounded prominence near articulation with finger provided wath stout spine ; finger very large and strong, of curved form with concave margin bearing a slight eminence toward middle. Epimera low, suboval in form, third slightl}- bilobed ventrally, second epimeron highest. Uropods, 3 pairs, biramous ; first pair with peduncle longer than the styliform rami ; second pair rather stouter than first, rami pro- vided with numerous stout setae ; third pair with short peduncle and rather broad, subrectangular lamelliform rami of which the inner one is shorter than the outer one and provided only at apex with setae, outer ramus also wdth setae on outer margin, third uropods extending slightly beyond first and second. Telson rectangular, slightly broader than long, incised for -/s of its length with the lobes widely dehiscent, lobes truncate and distal angles provided with several setae. Length of single male specimen which was in the collection. 5 mm. The species has been reported by Pearse from the Gulf Stream, off Key West, Florida, in 98 fathoms. Station 7279, U. S. Bureau of Fisheries, steamer Fish Hawk; and 122 fathoms, Station 7296. The Amphipoda of Bermuda. 49 Maera tinkerensis sp. nov. Eyes rather large, circular, with ocelli very widely separated, hiterantennal lobes of head not prominent. Back sparsely setose. First antennae with long peduncle, somewhat longer than fiagellum, more than ^/2 as long as body ; first joint of peduncle tapering slightly, rather longer than head, bearing on proximal half of lower margin 3 setae equidistant from each other and on upper margin, numerous very fine setae, apically a single seta and fascicle of setae; second joint more slender than first and slightly longer, ]:)rovided with fascicles of setae on upper margin and short setae on lower; third joint less than ^/s as long as second; principal fiagellum composed of many segments, provided apically with short Fig. 18. Maera tinkerensis sp. nov. setae ; accessory fiagellum long, made up of 5 segments. Second antennae only slightly longer than peduncle of first, with gland cone long and slender ; third joint about 3 times as long as broad ; fourth and fifth joints slender, fourth being slightly longer than fifth ; fia- gellum scarcely longer than last joint of pedimcle, made up of about 6 segments. Mandibles with denticulated cutting edge and all parts moderately developed ; palp 3-jointed, with second joint longest ; third joint of tapering form and provided with long setae on inner margin. Lower lip of ordinary form, rather broad and furnished with strong mandib- ular processes. First maxillae with 2-jointed palp of uniform width and with square apex and furnished with 7 or 8 plumose spines, proximal joint of palp with numerous very fine setae on outer margin ; outer plate extending beyond middle of second joint of palp, some- Trans. Conn. Acad., Vol. XVI. 4 May, 1910. 50 B. W. Kunkel, what tapering with apex truncate and provided with about 8 branched (antler-Hke) spines ; inner plate small, triangular, with 3 spines api- cally. Second maxillae of usual form with oval plates, outer plate broader distally, inner one broader proximally. Maxillipeds with 4-jointed palp, second joint long and slender, more than 4 times as long as broad, third joint as long as fourth including terminal spine ; outer plate rather narrow and slender, reaching nearly to end of second joint of palp, provided on inner margin with row of closely set toothlike spines which become longer toward distal end of plate where they become plumose ; inner plate rectangular, with plumose, spines on apical margin and distal portion of inner margin, which bears at distal end a submarginal toothlike spine and external to this a fascicle of simple setae. In male, first gnathopods with epimeron which is higher than long and which projects strongly anteriorly, with a short seta just behind anterior ventral corner; second joint moderately long with several setae near middle of posterior margin ; third joint slightly longer than broad with fascicle of setae near distal end of posterior margin ; fourth joint short with posterior margin very convex so that joint is ^/s as broad as long, posterior margin with numerous setae on distal portion ; wrist subrectangular, widening somewhat toward distal end, as broad as hand and slightly longer, posterior margin with 8 or 9 fascicles of slender setae which increase in length distally, surface of wrist provided with many fascicles of short simple setae and longer pectinate spines ; hand oval, with more or less convex palm passing by even curve into posterior margin, provided with 2 prehensile spines, posterior margin with 3 fascicles of setae, palm finely serrated and provided with numerous submarginal setae, surface of hand and anterior margin further furnished with fascicles of setae ; finger of usual form with single seta on outer margin near base and 5 or 6 blunt spines on inner margin. Second gnathopods with epimeron about as broad as long, with ventral margin slightly convex and furnished with 4 or 5 setae; second joint long, with posterior margin convex and furnished with 4- or 5 setae placed at equal distances from each other ; third joint somewhat longer than broad ; fourth joint twice as long as broad, broadening somewhat distall}', with posterior margin elongated to form a sharp projection having 2 setae at base ; wrist triangular, not as wide as hand, with posterior margin rounded to fit internal to projection on fourth joint, rounded portion covered with setae of various lengths, the longest being on the margin ; hand large. The Aniplilpoda of Bermuda. 51 oval, nearl}' twice as long as wide, with anterior margin having a number of fascicles of setae, palm oblique, more than ^/2 as long as hand, posterior margin furnished with 5 or 6 fascicles of setae, prolonged to form a notch behind which the end of the dactyl fits, notch provided with fascicle of long setae and with 2 spines bearing cilia-like appendages, palm serrated and provided with submarginal setae of various lengths; linger of usual form with 3 slender setae on convex margin and 9 submarginal filiform spines on internal margin. Pereiopods moderately slender, seventh slightly longer than sixth ; epimera of moderate size with ventral margin convex and furnished with a few setae. None of the segments dentate dorsally. Postero-inferior margin of third abdominal segment entire. Uropods, 3 pairs which are biramous, first extending as far as second and having rami subequal and longer than peduncle, the inner margin of which is furnished with 6 spines and apex with several rather long spines, rami with 4 spines on inner margin and group of longer ones at apex ; second uropods with peduncle shorter than that of first and also relatively much shorter than rami which are subequal and stouter than those of the first ; terminal uropods extending far beyond others, with peduncle short and provided with setae on distal margin, outer ramus somewhat longer than inner, of uniform width, furnished externally with 4 notches in which are fascicles of setae, inner margin with 4 short spines and fascicle of long spines apically, inner ramus of slightly tapering form with outer margin furnished with 3 spines and inner with 4 and apex with a fascicle of setae. Telson longer than broad, deepl}' cleft, each lobe being incised to form a triangular notch in apex and armed with one spine and fine seta. Length 4 mm. The species was represented in the collection by several males from Harrington sound. Elasmopus rapax A. Costa, 1858. 1853. A. Costa, Rendic. della Soc. Reale Borbon., Ace. delle Sci., Napoli, n. ser.. vol. 2, p. 175. Body moderately compressed and stout, back without carinae or spines but with sparse, very fine setules. Postero-lateral angle of first 2 abdominal segments about 90 ", third segment rather rounded 52 B. If\ Kuiikci and slightly acute ; ventral mariiu(hi. 67 First antennae terminating about on level with first third of fla- gellum of second antennae ; peduncle slightly less than ^j^ as long as flagellum, first joint longest and stoutest, third slightly shorter than second which in turn is about ^2 3-S long as first; flagellum composed of about 12 elongated segments. Second antennae not as long as body, with peduncle less than ^/a as long as flagellum ; third joint scarcely as broad as long, fourth and fifth joints subequal in length, fourth much thicker than fifth ; flagellum composed of about 16 elongated segments. Mandibles strong, oblong, principal and secondary cutting edges divided into 3 or 4 teeth of difterent sizes, molar tubercle very Fig. 25. Hyale jnero'-fu (^Miliie-Edwards). large and cylindrical with flat grinding surface, palp absent. Lower lip with no inner plates, outer plates stout, rather widely separated from each other, anterior margins rather short and densely ciliated, mandibular processes short but strong. First maxillae with 1-jointed palp which does not extend beyond apex of outer plate, provided with single apical seta ; outer plate large, having oblique apical margin with numerous stout, forked and pectinate spine teeth ; inner plate slender, triangular, with 2 plumose spines at apex. Second maxillae with inner plate rather shorter than outer and about as wide, both plates provided with setae apically. Maxillipeds with 4-jointed palp; inner plates rectangular extending nearly as far as apex of first joint of palp and provided on distal margin, which is transverse, with 3 triangular odontoid spines and numerous plumose spines which also occur on the straight inner margin ; outer plate 68 B. IV. Kunkel, extending slightly beyond apex of tirst joint of palp, outer margin convex and apical margin rounded and provided with numerous submarginal setae ; palps strong, first joint with outer margin about 3 times as long as inner, second joint nearly twice as long as first and ver}^ broad on account of presence of broad lobe on inner side which is produced distally and bears numerous long, stout setae at apex and distal part of inner margin ; third joint about as long as first, provided with broad, rounded lobe on inner side at distal end so that joint is much broader distally than proximally, outer apex also provided with small, rounded lobe, distal margin and lobes armed with many long, stout setae ; fourth joint about as long as third, clawlike, with concave margin provided with numerous setae. In female, first gnathopods somewhat smaller than second ; epim- eron rather deeper than long with anterior ventral angle rounded and not greatly produced ; second joint moderately stout, with an- terior margin slightly concave, posterior margin convex and prox- imal end much thinner than distal, anterior distal angle produced to 'form rounded lobe, posterior margin with 2 rather stout pectinate spines near middle ; third joint short, with posterior distal angle provided with long pectinate spine and several setae ; fourth joint subrectangular, more than twice as long as broad, provided with several pectinate spines on distal margin ; wrist ^/a as broad as long, articulating with fourth joint by entire anterior margin of fourth, posterior margin forming a semicircular lobe which is provided with closel}' set row of pectinate spines ; hand subrectangular, slightly broader at distal end than proximal, posterior margin provided with row of pectinate spines occupying middle third of margin which at this point is slightly convex, outer surface of hand provided with diagonal row *of stout, plumose spines, palm slightly oblique and convex, provided with several setae and 2 prehensile spines ; finger of usual form, short and stout and provided with several setae on con- cave margin. Second gnatho])ods similar to first but having epimeron subrect- angular with ventral margin rounded and palm of hand slightly more oblique than that of first ; whole appendage stouter in all respects than first. In male, first gnatho])ods with e])imeron having anterior ventral angle not greatly produced ; second joint stout, with anterior margin straight and posterior margin convex with several sharply pointed spines at nearl}- equal distances from each other; third joint about as long as wide ; fourth subrectangular with anterior margin forming articulation with wrist which is triancfular, much longfer than wide The Aniphipoda of Bermnda. 69 and with posterior margin produced to form prominent semicircular lobe which is provided with row of stout, pectinate spines ; hand suboval, slightly longer than wrist, posterior margin with single stout toothlike spine situated submarginally ; palm rather oblique and slightly convex, provided with a regular row of submarginal setae and a very large prehensile spine; finger of usual form, moderately stout. Second gnathopods with rounded epimeron, about as high as long ; second joint rather short with anterior margin prolonged distally to form triangular process ; third joint short ; fourth joint quadrilateral, posterior margin much longer than anterior, distal margin rather longer than proximal ; wrist articulating with anterior margin of fourth and having form of equilateral triangle ; hand oval, with base incised to form 2 equal lobes, the anterior one of which forms articu- lation with wrist, about twice as long as wide, palm rather longer than posterior margin which is separated from it by several pre- hensile spines and distinct prehensile angle, provided with double row of rather stout submarginal setae ; finger rather long and curved in usual way. Fourth epimeron much higher than fifth which is suboval. Fifth and sixth pereiopods with sixth joint having spine and setae on posterior margin. Uropods essentially . as in H. pontica ; telson semicircular, broader than long and divided by deep incision nearly to base. Length 7—9 mm. The species, which is apparently one of the commonest species in Bermuda, occurs very abundantly among the fronds of Ulva in the Mediterranean and is reported from the east coast of North America, Rio Janeiro, and Valparaizo, Peru. Some of the specimens were collected on Somerset Island by W. M. Rankin in 1898, there were some also collected from dead coral from Castle Harbor. Hyale pontica Rathke, 1837. 1837. Rathke, Mem. Acad. Imper. des Sci. de St. Petersbourg, vol. 3, p. 378, pi. 5, fig. 20-28. Eyes large, compound, subtriangular, ocelli small and arranged close together. First antennae about '/s as long as body, extending as far as middle of second antennae; peduncle short, more than '/s length of entire appendage ; first joint fairly stout, abovit twice as long as wide with a few setae around distal margin; second joint more 70 B. JV. Kimkel, slender and not so long as first ; third more slender than second and slightly shorter; flagellum with 13 segments. Second antennae with flagellum much longer than peduncle, fourth segment about ^/s shorter than fifth ; first, second, and third joints short and jjro- vided on distal ends with setae ; flagellum made up of about 20 segments j^rovided with setae on distal ends. Mandibles strong, palp wanting ; Ijotli cutting edges divided into 5 or 6 teeth ; 5 plumose spines on spine row ; molar tubercle large ; Fig. 26. Hyula punfict H. Katlike. bearing plumose flagellum. Lower lip with no inner plate ; outer plate broad, with anterior margin entire and mandibular processes rather small. First maxillae with inner plate slender, triangular and furnished with 2 plumose spines apically ; outer plate moderateh' large with 9 stout pectinate spines in a double row on distal margin which is transverse ; palp small and slender, one-jointed, furnished with setae at apex. Second maxillae with inner plate somewhat smaller than outer ; both oval in form : inner plate provided with pectinate spines on apex and distal half of inner margin ; outer plate witii The Amphipoda of Bermuda. 71 numerous setae on apex, and several small setae on inner margin. Maxillipeds with 4-jointed palp, the fourth joint of which is conical and provided with a fascicle of fine setae on apex ; third joint very broad, narrower at base than at apex, with many long setae near distal margin; second joint about as long as third, with rounded process on distal end of inner margin which is provided with setae ; first joint short, with outer margin much longer than inner; outer plate reaching nearly to distal end of second joint of palp, provided with setae on rounded apex and inner margin; inner plate long and narrow, with fine setae on outer and inner margins and several toothlike spines on apex. In male, first gnathopods smaller than second, with epimeron elongated anteriorly and having ventral margin only slightly convex and provided with many submarginal setae ; second joint projecting half its length beyond epimeron, constricted proximally, provided with 2 stout curved spines on posterior margin ; third joint as broad as long ; fourth joint about twice as long as wide, articulating with wrist by anterior margin ; wrist triangular, having rounded lobe on posterior side which is provided with many setae ; hand subrect- angular, not so broad as wrist and having palm slightly oblique, provided with diagonal row of plumose spines across surface and with group of setae -\-i distance to distal end of posterior margin, palm provided with many submarginal setae of various lengths and with prehensile spine ; finger strong, curved, and provided with a few setae on inner margin. Second gnathopods with epimeron rounded ventrally, higher than long and bearing triangular lobe on posterior margin and submarginal setae ventrall}' ; second joint extending considerably be3-ond epimeron, with roimded lobe at antero-distal angle ; third and fourth segments essentially as in first gnathopod ; wrist triangular and smaller than in first ; hand large, oval, about twice as long as broad, posterior margin continuous with palm by even curve and provided with many teeth and setae of various lengths, prehensile spine present ; finger strong and curved, having a few setae on concave margin. Pereiopods furnished with dactyls, last 2 pairs subequal ; epimera moderate with margins entire except for rounded notch on first 3 ; that of second pereipod largest of series. Uropods, 3 pairs ; first and second biramous, first longer than second and third, wnth rami somewhat shorter than peduncle, the inner one of which is slightly longer than the outer, provided with 2 or 3 spines on dorsal margin and several on apex ; second with peduncle relatively shorter than that of first, otherwise of similar 72 B. W. Ktmkel, form ; terminal uropods quite short, uniramous, with ramus shorter than peduncle and bearing several spines on apex, peduncle extend- ing beyond telson. Telson thick, very deeply cleft, broader than long. There were present in the collection only a few males having a length of about 15 mm. The species has been previously recorded from the North Atlantic, the North Sea, and the Mediterranean. Hyale trifoliadens sp. nov. Eyes small, compound, deeply pigmented in alcoholic specimens. First antennae with peduncle half as long as flagellum ; lirst joint slightly longer than second, stout, scarcely twice as long as broad ; third joint short and slender, very similar to first joint of flagellum which is made up of about 9 segments. Second antennae much Fig. 27. Hyale trifoliadens sp. nov. longer than first, scarcely V2 as long as body; peduncle nearly as long as entire first antennae ; first and second joints short and broad with gland cone slender ; third joint not as long as broad ; fourth joint twice as long as broad and shorter than fifth which is more slender; flagellum made up of al)out 15 segments ]:)rovided with setae on distal margins. Mandibles strong ; palp wanting ; princi]:)al cutting edge divided into 3 teeth ; secondary cutting edge with 2 processes, much smaller than principal ; spine row with a munber of short plumose spines ; molar tubercle .large, furnished with a plumose seta. The Amphipoda of Bcrunida. 73 Lower lip and first and second maxillae as in H. pontica. Maxilli- peds with inner plates well developed, narrow, extending as far as first joint of palp, provided with plumose spines on inner margin and apex which also bears 3 odontoid spines ; outer plate extending well beyond inner and bearing 2 plumose spines apically and m;iny setae on inner margin; palp well developed with second joint sub- rectangular and bearing a semicircular lobe on inner distal angle and with many setae on inner margin ; third joint about as long as first, broader distally than proximally and bearing many setae on distal margin; fourth joint more or less clawlike, not as long as preceding joint. In male first gnathopods with epimeron longer than high, rounded ventrally but with anterior angle projectmg well forward ; second joint moderately stout, projecting well beyond epimeron, bearing on anterior margin 2 or 3 short setae and several long setae on distal posterior angle ; third joint about as long as broad with a few setae on distal posterior angle ; fourth joint about twice as long as wide with a few setae on posterior distal angle ; fifth joint articulating with fourth along nearly entire anterior margin, more or less triangular with prominent semicircular lobe bearing long setae on posterior margin, anterior margin moderately convex ; hand sub- rectangular, rather more than twice as long as broad, not as broad as wrist, posterior margin bearing single fascicle of setae near middle, palm transverse and furnished with setae, the longest of which are at the prehensile angle ; finger fairly stout, of usual form. Second gnathopods with epimeron slightly shorter than that of first gnathopods with ventral margin evenly rounded ; second joint robust but slender at proximal end, bearing a few setae on anterior and posterior margins ; third joint as long as broad, with a few setae on distal posterior angle ; fourth joint triangular, articulating with wrist by distal portion of anterior margin, bearing several setae on apex ; wrist rather short, bearing long curved process on posterior side which renders wrist broader than hand which bears a fascicle of setae apically ; hand oval, rather broader distally than proximally, about twice as long as broad, palm somewhat oblique, straight, provided with numerous setae of various lengths and prehensile spine, posterior margin with fascicle of setae near middle ; finger of usual form and size ; second gnathopods in every way stronger than first. In female, first gnathopods with wrist longer than in male and provided with many more setae on posterior margin ; hand shorter than in male and furnished with many setae on posterior margin, 74 B. IV. Ktuikel, provided with prehensile spine. In second gnathopods, wrist shorter than in first and hand more nearly oval with palm qnite obhque and posterior margin much shorter than palm and provided with several groups of spines, palm with numerous submarginal spines of various lengths and 2 prehensile spines ; finger moderately stout, provided with 2 short cilia on inner concave margin. Other characters as in H. poniica. The species was represented by several individuals 6—8 mm. in length. Parhyalella gen. nov. First antennae longer than peduncle of second ; first maxillae with palp wanting ; maxillipeds with 4-jointed palp, last joint being ungui- form ; gnathopods subchelate ; telson entire. This genus is closel}^ related to H3'alella but differs from it in the alisence of a maxillary palp. Parhyalella batesoni sp. nov. Eyes moderately large, compound, situated well toward dorsal side of head. First antennae nearly as long as second ; peduncle longer than flagellum which is composed of about a dozen rather short segments which are markedly broader at the distal than at proximal end ; first joint of peduncle very stout, scarcely longer than broad, second joint subequal in length but much narrower, third joint shorter than second and about twice as long as broad. Second antennae with first and second joints of peduncle short and coalesced with head, gland cone absent, third joint about as broad as long, fourth joint rather more than twice as long as broad, fifth joint somewhat longer and more slender than fourth ; flagellum very short, scarcely longer than last joint of peduncle, m.ade up of onl}' a few segments which rapidly become shorter and thinner distally. Mandibles with principal cutting edge divided into 6 teeth of which the second and third from the anterior end are largest, sec- ondary edge divided into 5 nearly equal teeth, molar tubercle ver}' strong, palp wanting. First maxillae with palp wanting, outer plate rather large with pectinate and branched spine-teeth on distal end ; inner plate rather short and slender with 2 plumose spines on apex. Second maxillae with outer and inner plates rather narrow and sub- equal, outer one with setae on distal margin, inner one with setae also on distal half of inner margin. Maxillipeds with inner and outer plates rather small, outer plates extending as far as apex of first The Ampiiipoda of Bermuda. 75 joint of pal[) and inner one extendincr not quite so far ; distal margin of inner plate provided with 3 odontoid spines and numerous plu- mose spines, outer plates with inner margin and a]:)ex which is rounded, provided with setae ; palp 4-jointed with first joint ver}' short and outer apex rather prolonged, second joint not as long as broad with broad lobe extending along inner side provided with row of stout spines, fourth joint clawlike, about as long as third joint. In male, first gnathopods with moderately high epimeron produced at antero- ventral angle ; second joint stout ; wrist triangular, about Fig. 28. Parhyalelld hatesoni sp. iiov. as broad as long and bearing prominent rounded lobe on posterior margin ; hand subrectangular, not as broad as wrist, nearly twice as long as wide, palm rather short and nearly transverse, provided with setae of various lengths, prehensile angle rounded and furnished with stout spine ; finger short and ver}' stout. Second gnathopods ver}- large with subrectangular epimeron which are higher than long ; second joint of moderate proportions with projecting lobe on anterior side ; fourth joint with anterior and pos- terior margins nearly parallel and with posterior apex somewhat produced ; wrist triangular, short, with very broad lobe from distal posterior angle which projects as far as posterior margin of fourth joint; hand oval, about twice as long as wide, with base deeply 76 B. W. Kunkel, incised, palm oblique and furnished with submarginal setae, prehen- sile angle moderately prominent and bearing two stout setae ; finger long and curved. Telson triangular, about as broad as long with apex rounded. Length 9 mm. There was a single specimen in the collection. Microdeutopus anomalus (Rathke, 1843) Bate, 1862. 1843. Gauunanis anomahis. Rathke, Nova Acta Acad. Caesa- real Leopold. Carol. German., vol. 30 I, p. 63, pi. 4, fig. 7. 1862. Microdeutopus anomalus. Bate, Cat. Brit. Mus., p. 164, pi. 30, fig. 3. Eyes small, round, compound, widely separated from each other dorsally, and very close to margin of interantennal lobes. Head produced to form short, rather acutely pointed rostrum. First antennae about one half as long as body and with principal flagellum longer than peduncle, made up of about 25 segments and provided with accessory flagellum of 4 or 5 elongated joints ; second joint of peduncle longest, third joint not more than one half as long as first. Second antennae somewhat shorter than first, with very short flagellum of about 8 joints furnished with setae ; glandular cone long and slender; third joint less than twice as long as broad, fourth and fifth joints very long and slender, subequal in length. Mandibles with all parts well developed, palp 3-jointed, with third joint longer than second and with proximal half broad and distal half tapering to a point and provided on inner margin with setae ; primary and secondary cutting edges denticulated. Lower lip with outer plates having anterior margin entire and widely separated from each other and with inner plates wide, mandibular processes long and slender. First maxillae with inner plate small, triangular, provided apically with single plumose spine, outer plate of moderate size with oblique distal margin armed in usual w^a}- ; palp well devel- oped, 2-jointed, second joint curved and moderatel}' long, with apex rounded and furnished with group of setae. Second maxillae with plates moderately broad and rounded apically, furnished with abun- dant setae on distal end ; outer plate slightly longer and broader than inner. Maxillipeds with large rectangular inner plates extend- ing as far as apex of first joint of palp, and furnished with slender spines apically ; outer plates broad, extending nearly as far as apex of second joint of palp, outer margin and apex rounded, inner mar- gin straight and furnished with short odontoid spines which become longer at apex ; palp 4-jointed and slender, second joint longest, terminal joint provided with claw^like spine. The Amphipoda of Bcrnnida. 77 First gnathopods of female larger than second ; epimeron moderate, third and fourth joints small ; wrist rather large, nearly oval in form, about twice as long as broad, posterior margin more convex than anterior and provided with slender setae ; hand subrectangular, more than twice as long as broad and somewhat longer than wrist, broader at distal end than at proximal, jialm slightly oblique, irreg- ular in shape, with stout spine tooth sejiarating it from posterior margin ; linger moderate in size, of usual form with concave margin serrated. Second gnathopods with small rounded epimera as long as high ; second joint long and slender, of uniform thickness ; third and Fig. 29. Microdentopus aiiomalus (H. Ratlike). fourth joints small ; wrist triangular, twice as long as l)road, provided with numerous long setae on posterior margin ; hand subrectangular, shorter than wrist, palm nearly transverse, posterior margin and palm provided with abundant setae ; finger similar to that'of first gnathopod. Marsupial plates oval, about two and a half times as long as broad. Pereiopods of middle group short, with epimera of moderate size, longer than high ; posterior pereiopods very long and slender with second joints moderately expanded. Uropods, 3 pairs, biramous, first pair extending slightly beyond other two ; rami styliform with stout spines at apex and along inner margin, inner rami of first and second longer than outer, inner rami of third uropods slightly shorter. 78 B. IV. Kuiikcl, Telson oval, longer than broad, apex truncated, furnished with 2 symmetrical fascicles of moderately stout spines. Length, 8 mm. A single female represented the species in the collection. The species has been previously reported from the Atlantic Coast of Norway, the Shetlands, and the Black Sea. Autonoe longipes (Liljeborg, 1852) Bruzelius, 1859. 1852. Gammarus longipes. Liljeborg, Ofversigtaf Kongl. Vetens.- Akad. Forhandl. Stockholm, p. 10. 1859. Autonoe longipes. Bruzelius, Skandinavian Amphipoda Gammar., Kongl. Sv. Vetens.-Akad. Handl., vol. 3, p. 28. Eyes moderate, compound, reniform, approaching very close to- gether on dorsal side of head. First antennae rather long and slender with long flagellum com- posed of more than a dozen rather elongated segments; peduncle with first joint rather stout, nearly as long as head, second joint slender and longer than first, third joint small, about ^3 as long as second ; accessory flagellum made up of 5 joints. Second antennae with peduncle much longer than that of first ; gland cone prominent, third joint longer than broad, fourth and fifth joints subequal in length ; flagellum about as long as last joint of peduncle, composed of about 5 joints. Mandibles with principal cutting edge divided into several teeth ; secondary cutting edge also denticulate and rather narrow ; 4 spines on spine row ; palp 3-jointed with third joint longest, about as long as first and second together, inner margin straight, outer margin convex, provided with plumose spines on both margins, second joint about twice as long as first and somewhat stouter, with several long setae on inner margin, first joint rather short, broader at distal end than at proximal. Lower lip with outer plates rounded, anterior margins entire, not very broad ; mandibular processes long and pointed, diverging considerably ; inner plates broad, rounded. First maxillae with inner plates rudimentary and l^earing single long plu- mose spine apically ; outer plates broad, with distal margin oblique, inclining toward inner margin, furnished with usual spine teeth ; palp 2-johited, first joint as broad as long and with single seta on outer distal margin, second joint 4 times as long as broad with blunt apex pro- vided with a number of slender teeth and setae. Second maxillae with oval plates which are rather broad ; outer plates provided with many long setae distally ; inner plates smaller than outer with The Amphipoda of Bermuda. 79 plumose spines on inner margin and setae on distal margin and in a row extending obliquely from middle of distal margin to inner margin proximally. Maxillipeds with inner plates short and provided with plumose spines on transverse distal and inner margins ; outer plates extending as far as second joint of palp, having outer margin convex and unarmed and inner margin, which is straight, provided with broad toothhke spines which become more slender distally and become plumose spines around distal margin ; palps long, 4-jointed, of which the first joint is longer than broad, the second joint 3 times as long as broad with a number of long setae on inner margin ; Fig. 30. Autotioe longipes Bruzelius. third joint about -/a as long as second, being broader at di.stal end and provided with many long setae ; fourth joint as long as third and unguiform. In male, first gnathopods with small subrectangular epimeron; second joint very stout, ^/y as broad as long, widest in middle ; third joint very short with several setae on postero-distal angle; fourth joint longer than third and more slender with a few setae on posterior margin ; wrist triangular, broader than long, having posterior margin provided with long setae ; hand large, oval, with anterior margin rather convex and much longer than posterior which bears several fascicles of long setae, palm oblicjue, not very long, provided with 80 B. W. Kiinkel, deep notch near prehensile angle and provided with numerous setae, apex of hand with fascicle of long setae ; linger rather large, of usual form with concave margin provided with numerous cilia. Second gnathopods much smaller than first, with rhomboidal epimeron about as long as high ; second joint moderate in width, fairly long, anterior margin curved, posterior margin rather strongly convex ; third and fourth joints as in first gnathopods but third rather more slender ; wrist triangular, rather large, longer and broader than hand, provided with very short setae on anterior margin and with several fascicles of setae on posterior margin ; hand subrect- angular, provided with setae on anterior and posterior margins, palm moderate, with long prehensile spine and fascicle of setae ; finger very large with concave margin serrated. In female, first gnathopods with second joint much more slender than in male ; third and fourth joints provided with many more setae which are also longer than in male ; wrist longer than in male, and hand more slender, being subrectangular, with ]3alm somewhat oblique and sinuous, provided with prehensile spine and setae of various lengths, posterior margin with many long setae and anterior submargin with several fascicles of slender setae ; finger slender, with concave margin serrated. Second gnathopods smaller than first, with second joint more slender and wrist broader than in male ; hand subrectangular, not unlike that of male but setae rather longer. E])imera moderately low, l^eing longer than high in each case, diminishing slightl}' in height posteriorly, those of fourth and fifth pereiopods being not more than half as high as long and suboval in form ; fourth not emarginate posteriorly ; third, fourth and fifth pereiopods with second joints normally expanded ; last pereiopods longest, with fourth, fifth and sixth joints especially long and slender ; first and second pereiopods with spinning glands. Uropods, 3 pairs, biramous ; first pair longest with peduncle some- what longer than rami which are equal in length and provided with stout spines ; second pair extending posteriori}^ as far as first ; ter- minal pair very short, not extending as far as preceding, rami styliform. Telson slightly broader than long, with distal margin slightly concave, postero-lateral angle provided with a spine and several longer setae. Length 5.5 mm. This species has been previously reported from Naples, the coast of Scandinavia, Great Britain, and Port Jackson, Australia. The Amphipoda of Bermuda. 81 Eurystheus lina sp. no v. Eyes compound, suboval, situated well on lateral aspect of head on prominent interantennal lobes and widely separated from each other. Antennae subequal ; first antennae rather stout with peduncle somewhat longer than fiagellum ; first joint of peduncle cylindrical Fig. 31. Enrysthens lina sp. nov. and about 3 times as long as broad, second joint nearl}- twice as long as first and more slender, third joint somewhat shorter than second, all joints provided with abundant setae, especially on lower margin ; principal fiagellum made up of about 1 1 joints, also pro- vided with abundant setae ; accessory fiagellum made up of 4 or 5 joints. Second antennae with gland cone rather prominent and moderately long ; third joint hardly twice as long as wide and with Trans. Conn. Acad., Vol. XVI. 6 May, 1910. 82 B. W. Knukel, distal end somewhat wider than proximal and provided with rather long setae on ventral margin ; fourth joint rather long and slender, cylindrical ; fifth joint shorter than fourth ; flagellum about as long as fourth joint of peduncle, made up of 4 or 5 short, stout segments which are provided with setae. Mandibles triangular, with principal and secondary cutting edges denticulated, with 9 or 10 spines on spine row and with prominent molar tubercle ; palp 3-jointed, first joint short and cup-shaped with proximal end very narrow, second joint about 3 times as long as broad, slightly broader distally and with rather long setae on inner margin, third joint slightly shorter than second with rounded apex which is provided with abundant setae. Lower lip with outer plates having anterior margin entire. First maxillae having inner plate tri- angular and with numerous setae on inner margin ; outer plate of usual form with stout spines on oblique apex ; palp 2-jointed, of which the first is about as long as wide and the second is some- what curved and club-shaped with setae on rounded apex. Second maxillae of usual form with plates rounded distall}'. Maxillipeds with plates well developed and with 4-jointed palp ; inner plates rectangular with distal margin provided with abundant setae and a few spines ; outer plates extending nearly as far as distal end of second joint of palp, with inner margin straight and armed with broad toothlike spines and abundant setae, outer and distal margins convex, distal margin with long setae ; palp with first joint short, hardly as long as broad, second joint cylindrical, 3 times as long as broad and with long and abundant setae on inner margin, third joint 2/3 as long as second with rounded apex having abundant setae, fourth joint less than ^/2 as long as third with rounded apex as in third joint. In male, first gnathopods with moderate epimera having anterior ventral angle only slightly produced and with ver}' short setae on ventral margin ; second joint moderate in size, third joint rather shorter than broad; fourth joint broader toward distal end than proximal with posterior margin much longer than anterior and with 4 or 5 fascicles of setae ; wrist as long as second joint, subtriangular with distal margin somewhat oblique, posterior margin with 5 or 6 fascicles of setae and with similar number of fascicles along axis of joint; hand suboval, slightly broader than wrist, more than ^j^ as broad as long, anterior and posterior margins slightly convex, posterior margin passing by even curve into palm which is slightly convex and provided with setae of various lengths, prehensile angle with spine, posterior and anterior margins with numerous fascicles- of setae ; finger long and moderately slender, serrated. Tlic ^{lupliipoda of Bcriiiuda. 83 Second gnathopods very much larger in every way than first, epimeron small, rounded and not higher than long; second joint large and stout with fascicles of setae on both anterior and posterior margins ; fourth joint hardly longer than third which is provided with rounded lobe on anterior distal apex ; wrist short and triangular, articulating with fourth joint by most of posterior margin, distal l)art of margin in form of lobe extending over distal end of fourth joint and provided with numerous setae; hand very large, subrec- tangular, twice as long as broad with posterior margin provided with numerous setae, posterior margin prolonged distally so that prehensile angle is acute and palm is more or less concave ; finger very stout, tapering and rounded apically, concave margin provided with a triangular process near base. Epimera rather low, first 2 pereiopods with spinning glands, last pereiopod slightly longer than preceding. Uropods 3 pairs, biramous ; posterior pair extending- shghtly beyond second which in turn extend slightly beyond first ; inner rami slightly longer than outer, styliform. Telson subrectangular, stout, bilobed, with lobes well separated by triangular emargination and armed apically with 2 or 3 stout spines. Length 6 mm. The species was represented by 2 specimens which were collected in 1903. Podoceropsis sophia Boeck, 1861. 1861. Boeck, Forh. Skand. Naturf, vol. 8, p. 666. Eyes compound, reniform, situated very close to front margin of head. First antennae slightly longer than second, with first 2 joints of peduncle rather stout, cylindrical and equal in length, last joint 2/3 as long as first; principal flagellum made up of 5 elongated joints, about as long as last 2 joints of peduncle ; accessory flagellum short, consisting of 2 unequal joints, the first of which is much longer than the second. Second antennae with second joint rather short but with gland cone rather long and slender ; third joint more than twice as long as broad, slightly thicker distally than proximally ; fourth and fifth joints subequal, about as long as first joint of first antennae ; flagellum made up of 6 joints, somewhat shorter than that of first antennae. Mandibles with 8-jointed jialp and denticulated cutting edge ; first joint short ; second and third subequal in length, second C3iindrical ; 84 B. IV. KxinkeL third broader at distal end which is rounded and provided with numerous long setae, some of which are plumose ; secondary cutting edge long ; molar tubercle prominent. Lower lip with outer plates having anterior margin entire. First maxillae with small triangular inner plate and 2-jointed palp, having terminal joint rounded api- cally and provided with a few setae ; outer plate with distal margin obliquely truncate and provided with toothed and branching spines. Second maxillae with inner ]:)late rounded apically with setae on inner margin ; outer plate somewhat longer than inner one and provided with long setae apically. Maxillipeds with plates well developed and 4-jointed palp ; inner plate rather slender, triangular, provided with fairly stout spines apically ; outer plate with rounded apex, furnished with odontoid spines and setae on inner margin and apex; last joint of palp cylindrical, furnished with single stout spine apicall}^ Fig. 32. Poduceroims SDjthia Boeck. In male, tirst gnathopods with trapezoidal epimeron projecting well forward, ventral margin provided with short setae ; second joint very stout and of moderate length, provided with long setae at distal end of posterior margin; third joint short; fourth some- what longer than broad and broader at distal end, articulating with wrist by anterior margin ; ])osterior margin and apex provided with long setae ; wrist triangular, somewhat longer than broad, with setae on posterior and distal margins; hand oval, somewhat longer than wrist and slightly broader, posterior margin passing by even cur\e into palm which is convex and provided with submarginal setae and a rather large prehensile spine ; hand also furnished with fascicles of setae on anterior margin and apex ; linger of usual form, rather long and bearing a single cilium near apex on inner concave margin. Second gnathopods with subrectangular epimeron much higher than long with ventral margin rounded; second joint stout and The Ampkipoda of Bermuda. 85 moderately long, anterior margin straight and provided with numerous ver}' long setae ; third joint very short ; fourth joint small, rectan- gular, about twice as long as broad with group of setae at apex, articulating with wrist by entire anterior margin ; wrist small and cup-shaped, broader than long, with a fascicle of setae on very short free portion of posterior margin ; hand large, much larger than that of first, subrectangular, palm rather irregular, convex near articulation of finger, bearing decided cavity with broad bottom in region of prehensile spine, posterior margin prolonged to form triangular process behind which the apex of the finger fits, posterior and an- terior margins provided with fascicles of setae, palm provided with a few setae of various lengths ; finger rather stout, of usual form. In female, gnathopods smaller than in male ; first gnathopods with relatively longer and more slender finger; second gnathopods with palm regularly convex and lacking prolongation of posterior margin of hand to form triangular process. Pereiopods of usual form, provided with pointed dactyls, first 2 pairs with spinning glands. Uropods, 3 pairs, biramous ; second pair projecting beyond first and third ; terminal uropods having rami nearly as long as ped- uncle and provided with several stout spines apically. Telson thick, short, entire. The species was "represented in the collection by a male and a female 2.5 mm. in length, collected by W. G. VanName, 1901. It has been recorded from the Arctic Ocean, Scandinavia, the British coast, and Shetland Isles (70—90 fathoms). Isaea longipalpus sp. nov. Eyes small, compound, circular. First antennae long and slender, more than ^\i as long as body, with elongated flagellum ; first joint of peduncle stout and armed with stout setae ; second joint slender, slightly longer than first ; third joint short and narrow, about ^/s as long as second ; principal flagellum considerably longer than peduncle, composed of numerous elongated joints ; accessory flagellum long, made up of at least 4 segments. Second antennae shorter than first ; gland cone rather prominent but not long ; third joint of peduncle slightly longer than broad'; fourth and fifth joints long and subequal in length ; flagellum about as long as last joint of peduncle, composed of about 6 joints. Mandibles strong, triangular, with principal cutting edge denticu- lated and all parts well developed ; palp 3-jointed, the first of which is rather long, only half as broad as long, second joint stouter than 86 B. IV. Kitnkel, tirst and about 3 times as lont : cf. 1. 112. 14 : 1 [. G8. 4 s. \?> responderunt scripsi: responderant V 158 Ai(sti}i Morris Harmon, excussam sibi proiecisse longius sphaeram I iS quam ipse dextera manu gestabat. I ;• id autem permutationem temporum indicabat, III d licet interpretaiites placentia responderent. Ill 6 (2) 5 post haec confessus est iunctioribus proximis II 6 quod tamquam desolatus III d secretum aliqviid videre desierit II y quod interdum adfuisse sibi squalidius aestimabat ; III fS et putabatur genius [esse] quidam tutelae salutis adpositus II ;' 10 eum reliquisse mundo citius digressurum. III(^ (3) ferunt enim theologi II 7 in lucem editis hominibus cunctis 1 6 (salva firmitate fatalij I y huiusmodi quaedam 7 velut actus rectura numina sociari, III d 15 admodum tamen paucissimis visa \6 quos multiplices auxere virtutes. I y (4) idque et oracula et auctores docuere praeclari, I ;' inter quos est etiam Menander comicus, lid ajjud quern hi senarii duo leguntur : I ;' {versus omisi) (5) 20 itidem ex sempiternis Homeri carminibus 11/ intellegi datur I (3 non deos caelestes cum viris fortibus conlocutos, III 6 nee adfuisse pugnantibus vel iuvisse, Illds sed familiaris genios cum isdem versatos. I ;' 25 quorum adminiculis freti praecipuis II;' Pythagoras enituisse 7 dicitur et Socrates III <3 g Numaque Pompilius 7 et superior Scipio II d et, ut quidam existimant, Marius II d et Octavianus cui Augusti vocabukmi delatum est primo, I (3 30 Hermesque Termaximus et Tyaneus Apol- lonius, II;' 11^3 atque Plotinus I;' ausus quaedam super hac re disserere mystica lid alteque monstrare I ;' quibus primordiis 7 hi genii animis conexi mortalium II ;' 9 esse seclnsi Gelenhnn secutus The Clausula in Anmtianus Marcellinus. 159 eas tamquam gremiis suis susceptas tuentur I ;' [quoad licitum est] docentque maiora si senserint puras \y 16 et a conluvione peccandi I ;' inmaculata corporis societate discretas. I ;' (X"\^ 1) 5 ingressus itaque Antiochiam festinando Con- stantius II ;' ad motum certaminum civilium ut solebat III 6 a avide surrecturus III (S paratis omnibus exire properabat inmodice, II ;' renitentibus plurimis murmure tenus : I 6 10 nee enim dissuadere palam audebat quisqiiam vel vetare. Ill 6 e (2) autumno iam senescente profectus, I / cum ad suburbanum venisset I ;' disiunctum exinde tertio lapide, II d Hippocephalum nomine, 116 15 lucente iam die \y6 cadaver hominis interfecti III 6 dextra iacens capite avulso conspexit I ;' contra occiduum latus extensum ; I y territusque omine, II 6 20 finem parantil^us fatis, I d destinatius ipse tendebat ; I ;' venitque Tarsum, I 6 ubi leviore febri contactus I y ratusque itinerario motu I 6 25 inminutae valetudinis excuti posse discrimen I ;' petit per vias difficiles Mobsucrenas, III 6 Ciliciae ultimam hinc pergentibus stationem III tV sub Tauri montis radicibus positam ; II 6 egredique secuto die conatus I y 30 invalente morbi gravitate detentus est ; II ;' l, paulatimque urente calore nimio venas I 6 ut ne tangi quidem corpus ems posset 1 6 in modum foculi fervens, I 6 cum usus deficeret medelarum III 6 35 ultimum spirans 1 6 deflebat exitium. II ;' 1 quoad licitum est seclnsi tit interpolata vel ex inargine in textitin intro- dncta : v. p. 235 32 e'lus 7'. /. 224 160 Austin Morris Hannoji, mentisque sensu turn etiam integro II ('i successorem suae potestatis statuisse dicitur lulianum. Ill ^ (3) deinde anhelitu iam pulsante letali conticuit, 11 ;- diuque cum anima conluctatus iam discessura, Ill;'(^ 5 abiit e vita I ;- 6 tertium nonarum Octobrium II y imperii (tricesimo octavo; vitaeque anno quadra- gesimo (quarto) (1 d) et mensibus paucis. I d (4) post quae supremis cum gemitu conclamatis, III 6 10 excitisque lamentis et luctu, I yd deliberabant locum obtinentes in aula regia primum 1 6 quid agerent quidve moliri del^erent ; I ;' paucisque occulte super eligendo imperatore temptatis I ;' incitante ut ferebatur Eusebio II ;- 15 quem noxarum conscientia stimulabat, III 6 cum novandis rebus imminens ol:)sisteret lulianus, 111 6 mittuntur ad eum Theolaifus et Aligildus tunc comites, II ;' 6 mortem indicantes propinqui, 1 ;' et oraturi ut mora omni depulsa I y 20 ad obtinendum obtemperare sibi paratum ten- deret orientem. Ill 6 (5) fama tamen rumorque loquebatur incertus 1 / Constantium voluntatem ordinasse postremam, 1 ;' in qua lulianum ut praediximus scripsit [et] heredem, ijy) et his quos diligeljat fidei commissa detulit et legata. llldt (6) 25 uxorem autem praegnantem reliquit, 1 y unde edita postuma eiusque nomine appellata II 6 III 6 cum adolevisset matrimonii iure copulata est Gratiano. Ill;' (3 (XVI. 1) bonorum igitur vitiorumque eius differentia vere servata I ;' 7 tricesimo octavo, rt quarto nc/i/. Jl'agnci-. J/ai quidem opinione nihil inutandmn : sin aittem niuldnditiii, alio inodo id fieri oporfrt 23 et delevi Acciirsium sccutns The Clausula in Aiiuiiianus Marcelli/iiis. 161 praecipua prima conveniet expediri. Ill cV imperatoriae auctoritatis cothurnum ubique custo- diens, II ;' popularitatem elato animo contemnebat et magno ; I ;' A erga tribuendas celsiores dignitates inpendio parens, I (^ 5 nihil circa administrationum augmenta I y praeter pauca novari perpessus, I ;' numquam erigens cornua militarium. IV (V (2) tiec sub eo dux quisquam cum clarissimatu pro- vectus est : II ?' ? erant enim ut nos quoque meminimusperfectissimi. IV 6 10 nee oceurrebat magistro equitum pro vinciae rector, I 6 nee eontingi ab eo civile negotium permittebat. Ill 6 sed cunctae castrenses et ordinariae potestates III 6 ut honorum omnium apicem II 6 priseae reverentiae more I d 15 praefectos semper suspexere praetorio. II ;' (3) in conservando milite nimium cautus, I (V examinatormeritorumnonnumquamsubscruposus, III 6 palatinas dignitates velut ex quodam tribuens perpendiculo : IV d' et sub eo nemo celsum aliquid acturus in regia II ;' 6 20 repentinus adhibitus est vel incognitus, 11/^7 sed qui post decennium officiorum magisterium vel largitiones vel simile quicquam esset recturus I ;' apertissime noscebatur. Ill 6 valdeque raro contigerat II y . ut militarium aliquis II 6 25 ad civilia regenda transiret, I ;' contraque non nisi pulvere l^ellico indurati III 6 praeficiel3antur armatis. I y (4) doctrinarum diligens adfectator, III 6 sed cum a rhetorica per ingenium desereretur obtvuisum I y 30 ad versificandum transgressus I ;' nihil operae pretium fecit. I 6 (5) in vita parca et sobria II yd 20 melhis caJit si est secludis, tct fiat adliibitus vel iucognitus (IV) : sed vide p. 2oy 22 magisterium vel largitiones quintam efficr't fornmni 162 Austin Morris Harmon, edendi potandique moderatione valetudinem ita retinuit tirmam I 6 ut raros colligeret morbos, I 6 sed eos non procul a vitae periculis : 11 y id enim evenire corporibus a lascivia dimotis et luxu I ;- d 5 diuturna experimenta 7 et probationes medendi monstrarunt. I y (6) somno contentus exiguo II ;' cum id posceret tempus et ratio, \\y^ perque spatia vitae longissima II y inpendio castas I 6 10 ut nee amaro ministro I ;' saltern suspicione tenus posset redargui : II y quod crimen etiam si non invenit malignitas tingit I 6 in summarum licentia potestatum. Ill 6 (7) equitandi et iaculandi 7 maximeque perite diri- gendi sagittas I ;' 15 artiumque armaturae pedestris I / perquam scientissimus. IV 6 quod autem nee tersisse umquam nares in publico II y^ nee spuisse nee transtulisse in partem alterutram vultum 1 6 aliquando est visus \y6 20 nee pomorum quoad vixerat gustavisse (III 6) ut dicta saepius praetermitto. Ill 6 (8) dinumeratis carptim bonis quae scire potuimus, II y nunc ad explananda eius vitia veniamus. Ill 6 cum esset in negotiis aliis II 6 25 principibus mediis conparandus, III 6 si adfectatae dominationis amplam quandam falsam reperisset aut levem, 1yd banc sine tine scrutando, I ;' fasque eodem loco ducens et nefas, \y6 Caligulae et Domitiani et Commodi \ly6 inmanitatem facile superabat; IIIc^ 30 quorum aemulatus saevitiam II ;' inter imperandi exordia 11/ cunctos sanguine et genere se contingentes stir- pitus interemit. Ill S 10 trxtiis incertus mare miuistro V 14 perite malim peritus 20 vixerat gustavisse scripsi vixerat gustaverit V The Clausula in Ammianus Marcelliims. 163 (9) addebatur miseronim aerumnis I y qui rei maiestatis imminutae vel laesae defere- bantur III ;' acerbitas eius 7 et iracundae suspiciones III / in huiusmodi cuncta distentae. I y 5 et siquid tale increpuisset III ;' in quaestiones acrius exurgens quam civiliter IV;'f spectatores adponebat his litibus truces ; I (5 mortemque longius in puniendis quibusdam I y si natura permitteret II y 10 conabatur extendi, I ;' in eiusmodi controversiarum partibus etiam Gal- lieno ferocior. II ;' (10) ille enim perduellionuni crebris verisque adpetitus insidiis, II ;' Aureoli et Postumi et Ingenui IV dt et Valentis cognomento Thessalonici III y 15 aliorumque plurium 7 mortem factura crimina ali- quotiens lenius vindicabat : III 6 hie etiam ficta vel dubia II ;' 6 adigebat videri certissima II ;' vi nimia tormentorum. Ill 6 (11) iustumque in eiusmodi titulis l\S 20 capitaliter oderat, II d cum maxime id ageret ut iustus aestimaretur et Clemens. I ;■ 6 et tamquam ex arida silva I 6 volantes scintillae I y flatu leni ventorum I / 25 adusque discrimina II / vicorum agrestium II ;' incohibili cursu perveniunt, II y ita ille quoque ex minimis causis I cV malorum congeries excitabat, III 6 30 Marci illius dissimilis principis verecundi, III 6 qui cum ad imperiale culmen in Syria Cassius surrexisset, III 6 epistularum fascem ab eo ad conscios missum, I 6 perlatore capto sibi oblatum, I y 6 quam v. p. 227 164 Austin Morris Harmon, ilico si^natum exuri praecepit, 1 y agens adhuc in Illyrico, H/^J' ne insidiatoribus cognitis II d invitus quosdam habere posset offenses. I ;' (12) 5 utque recte sentientes quidam arbitrabantur, III ;' virtutis erat jiotius indicium magnae I d imperio eundem Constantium sine cruore cessisse I ;' quam vindicasse tarn inclementer. Illj'd (13) ut Tullius quoqiie docet, I d 10 crudelitatis increpans Caesarem II 6 in quadam ad Nepotem epistula, II ;' ' neque enim quicquam aliud est felicitas ' inquit I 6 • nisi honestarum rerum prosperitas. [II ;■] vel ut alio modo detiniam, [II j'] 15 felicitas est fortuna adiutrix consiliorum bonorum, [I ;-] quibus qui non utitur [*] felix esse nullo pacto potest. ['^] Ergo in perditis impiisque consiliis [II ;'] quibus Caesar usus est [*] 20 nulla potuit esse felicitas [II ;'] feliciorque meo iudicio Camillus exvilans [*] quam temporibus isdem Manlius, [*j etiam si — id quod cupierat — regnare potuisset.' [*] (14) id Ephesius quoque Heraclitus adserens monet I d 25 et ab inertibus et ignavis III 6 a eventus variante fortuna I ;' superatos aliquotiens viros fuisse praestantes : I ;' illud vero eminere inter praecipuas laudes, I tV cum potestas in gradu I ;' 6 30 velut sub iugum missa nocendi saeviendi(que) cupiditate et irascendi Ill/rf in arce victoris animitropaeum erexeritgloriosum. Ill 6 (15) ut autem in externis bellis hie princeps fuit saucius et adflictus, III (S e ita prospere succedentibus pugnis civilibus tumidus, II (3 et intestinis ulceribus rei publicae IV (5^ 35 sanie perfusus horrenda : I ;■ quo pravo proposito magisquam recto vel usitato, III yd triumphalis arcus ex clade provinciarum III ;' 12 s. Tyrrell T'l. p. 2g2 : cpistnla no)i alibi traditur 30 (que) Gr/. The Clausula in Ammiamts Marcellinus. 165 sumptibus magnis erexit 7 in Galliis et Pamioniis, IV ^£ titulis gestorum adfixis, I ;' quoad stare poterunt moiiumenta lecturis. I ;' (16) uxoribus et spadonum gracilentis vocibus et pa- latinis quibusdam I / 5 nimium quantum addictus I y ad singula eius verba plaudentibus II y et quid ille aiat aut neget \y6 ut adsentire possint obseriiantibus. IV ^^ (17) augebat etiam amaritudinem temporum lid 10 flagitatorum rapacitas inexpleta, III 6 plus odiorum ei quam pecuniae conferentium ; IV 6 hocque multis intolerantius videbatur III 6 quod nee causam aliquando audivit I ;' nee provinciarum indemnitati prospexit I y 15 cum multiplicatis tributis et vectigalibus vexa- rentur. Ill 8 eratque super his adimere facilis quae donabat. III(5t (18) Christianam religionem absolutam et simplicem 11;- (3 anili superstitione confundens, I ;' in qua scrutanda perplexius quam conponenda gravius (versabatur), (III (5) 20 excitavit discidia plurima, II ^ quae progressa fusius aluit concertatione ver- borum, I ;' ut catervis antistitum iumentis publicis ultro ci- troque discurrentibus IV rf per synodos quas appellant, III(5£ dum ritum omnem ad suum trahere conantur arbitrium, II y 25 rei vehiculariae succideret nervos. I d (19) figura tali situque membrorum : I y subniger, luce oculorum edita, cernensque acutum, I ;' moUi capillo, 1 ;' rasis adsidue genis I c\ 30 lucentibus ad decorem, III(5f usque ad pubem ab ipsis colli continiis longior II (5 brevissimis cruribus et incurvis. Ill 6 s [unde saltu valebat et cursu.] (20) pollinctum igitur corpus defuncti ly 8 possint obseruantibus 7'. pp. 182, 233 19 versabatur insend Trans. Conn. Acad., Vol. XVI. 11 Oct., 1910. 166 Austin Morris Harmon, conditumque in loculis II /(^ lovianus etiamtum protector domesticus II y cum regia prosequi pompa 7 Constantinopolim usque iussus est II (5 cj prope necessitudines eius humandum. I ;' (21) eique vehiculo insidenti 7 quod portabat reHquias, II / 5 ut principibus solet, I 6 annonae militaris offerebantur indicia II y (ut ipsi nominant probaj I rf et animalia publica monstrabantur III (5 et ex usu crebrescebant occursus. I y 10 quae et alia horum similia II / eidem loviano imperium quidem I rf sed vicarium et umbratile (IVc^t) ut ministro rerum funebrium portendebant. III ^ 12 sed vicarium scripsi, sede et assum V^ sed et cassum Acciirs.^ unde sed cassum Gelen. v. p. 173 Chapter i. Nature of the Clausulae. The most casual glances at the pages of the foregoing selection from the Histories cannot but reveal the fact that Ammianus secured a rhythmical effect in his prose through the constant repetition of a limited number of accentual clausulae. It is almost equally obvious that the nature of each clausula is chiefly determined by two factors which must enter into it — the accentual cadence pure and simple, and the caesura. Founding our classification of the clausulae, therefore, upon these two essential features, we shall discuss first the divers accentual cadences or forms that Ammianus uses, and next the various word-groups or types by which each form is rendered. Were Ammianus' clausulae purely accentual, we should not need to carry our investigation any farther; but although accent is always the principal factor in his rhythm, syllable-quantity is not left entirely out of account in it. We must therefore give this element a place in our discussion of the nature of his clausulae, which we shall conclude with a brief inquiry into the matter of their origin. rORMS. The following table displays the various forms that occur among the clausulae in Book XXI (I) and in the collection of sentence- endings previously described (II), and records the frequency with which they recur. In compiling these statistics I have departed from Gardthausen's text only in two sentence-endings. ^ In the latter collection all direct quotations are left out of account; in Book XXI only two citations from Cicero. Table of I'orms. Coll. I J I r\j n'^ rsj r^ r\j 648 II r^n^r^i^ 1^ rsj Y) rLi r\j rvj r\j r\j ^ Uncertain 1425 Coll. ] 19 5 7 4 \_ 36~~ 1461 1787 3212 Coll. II Total 13 32 3 8 5 12 2 6 1 2 24 60 1811 3272 These results manifest unequivocally the uniformity of Ammianus' rhythm. His style is chiefh^ characterized b}' the inordinate re- petition of the cadences I, II and III, .which are presented in about 95 per cent of the clausulae. This proportion remains approximately the same whether we take all the clausulae into consideration or only those which end a sentence, although the discrepancy in the relative frequency of II and III in the two collections reveals the fact that II is used more often within the sentence than at its end, while the reverse is true of III. There can be no doubt, then, that these three are par excellence the favored forms. Since cadence IV is counted in tens whereas the cadences just mentioned are counted in hundreds, I must set forth the reason that has governed me in classing it with these. It is primarily that IV would naturally be a rare clausula, because when it is con- structed in two words it requires that the sentence or kolon end in a word of 5 or 6 syllables with antepenultimate accent imilitibus obscurissimis , constanti sollicitndine), and such words are not common.^ Furthermore, its occurrences are guaranted by sound texts and its rhythm emphasized by responsion, since most of the cases in Book XXI stand in close proximity to one another.^ It is therefore a good clausula, though, in comparison with the others, not a frequent one. In connection with these four clausulae two other forms 'come up for discussion which are so rare that I have not found a single certain instance of either one in either of my two collections. In spite of this their status is quite different from that of the cadences which I have listed as irregular. These forms are : VI PLir\jrK/r^r\jr\jr\jr'Lir\jn^ ' The actual cases are for the most part present participles in the dative or ablative plural, and superlatives. 2 See p. 204. The Clausula in Amiiiia/iits Marcellinus. 169 Of V I can cite five examples in Ammianus : II. 24. 25 pondere cir- cumveniretur ; 212. 27 venerint allegationum; 242. 18 ve'ritus ut adhiic durdiHem ; 268. 20 eminuit at Sebastidiii ; 269. 19 e'rat cum moderatione. To these should perhaps be added three ambiguous clausulae in Book XXI.^ Of VI I have only two instances : II. 79. 19 postea Co}istantinop6leos \ 214.6 Ae'sopi cavillationibus. It is possible that some instances of one form or the other may have escaped me, but they cannot be numerous. Consequently both the forms are extremely rare. But we must not let this move us to doubt their legitimacy, for all of the texts in which they occur seem to be sound and are very difficult to assail. Moreover, their rarity finds adequate explanation in the motive that prompted their use : they were brought into employment simply as a means of handling long words which' could not easily be disposed of otherwise.^ It is noteworthy that, if we except the three ambiguous cases of V in Book XXI, all the examples come from the last 9 books — in fact, 5 of them froni the last two books. This appears to indicate a late recognition of these forms, and a slightly increasing tendenc}' to use them, once they are recognized. The fact that their occur- rences are not in responsion but isolated is somewhat surprising. I can account for it only on the hypothesis that Ammianus regarded them as extensions of III and IV, and did not feel that they broke the rh3thm. It is obvious that forms V and VI stand in the same relation to III and IV in which the latter stand to I and II. Using metrical terms to define accentual rhythm (as we do in dealing with English poetry) we may say that each of these clausulae has 1 P. 142, 1. 14 trahendumque si reniterehir^ listed as doubtful (see below) ; p. 154, Q>S fal/acissintae geittis obse7-7'dntiir axidi tirgentia velut pugnatiiriis — two clausulae in apparent responsion, listed as examples of A (see below). * I note tlu-ee cases in wliicli a final word of 6 syllables witli penul- timate accent is not preceded by an antepenultimate Avord, but they are all corrupt. In I. 83. 5 correxerit et libera I /tate the Ms. reads correxit et libertaie (III), whicli should be retained in spite of tlie change in tense eget-it-correxit. (v. Lofstedt, Beitrdge ziir Kcnnt)iis d. spdter. Lett. p. 70 ff.) In II. 12. 14 amittit intempestuosos the ms. lias inteinpesiiosos., corrected into intempesiuosos by a later hand : the reading of Accursius intempestivos is in better accord with the usage of Ammianus. In IT. 64. 20 somniorum adsiduitate we have a case of hidden corruption : a verb has fallen out (v. Giinther, Phil. 50, p. 69) and it is most natural to supply it at the end of the clause, after adsiduitate. As for words like cavillatioiiibus.^ I have not found any instance of their employment before a pause except in the two cases cited above. 170 Atistin Morris Harmon, a dactylic-trochaic cadence — they differ from one another only in the number of trochees that follow the dactyl.^ The longer forms, in consequence of this similarit}', might well be used out of responsion, and the lack of it is certainly not a suflicient reason for expelling them from our text. Coming now to the four cadences A, B, C and D, listed as irregular, we may sum up their status in saying that the}^ were certainly avoided by Ammianus and probably avoided altogether. None of these cadences is of such a sort as to be naturally un- common. In a text in which no attention is paid to rhythm (there are few, if any, such among the ancient authors, but a modern writer of Latin will do for a test) all of them must needs occur very frequently. But in Ammianus, taken all together, they are less frequent in our text than the cadence IV, which would naturally be very rare. This fact can only be interpreted as evincing a strong disinclination on the part of Ammianus to employ these cadences. It justifies us in the statement that his rhythm is as much charac- terized in a negative way by their avoidance as it is in a positive way by the abnormal frequency of the cadences I, 11 and III. Under these circumstances it is natural to draw the inference that the cadences in question were avoided altogether, and that their appearance in our text is to be attributed to corruption. And in fact a study of the individual passages in which they occur makes it evident that not one of the four cadences can be called valid with any degree of certainty : on the contrary it is extremely prob- able that they are each and all corrupt. To put the reader in possession of sufficient evidence on this point I submit a full list of the instances found in Book XXI and in my collection of sentence- endings. ^ ' Tims I pnndere veiiit = dactyl -|- trochee, III poudere cjrcum- veiiit =^ dactyl -\- 2 trochees, V poiidere ci'rcumveniretur = dactj^l -|- 3 trochees; II pondere veniet = dactyl -\- 1^2 trochees (or dactyl-dactyl), IV pondere circumveniet = dactyl -j- 2 7^ trochees (or dactyl -trochee- dactyl), VI pondere circuravenientibus = dactyl -j- 3 '/a trochees (or dactyl-trochee-trochee-dactyl). ^ Cases from the former som-ce are cited in the order In which they occur, with references to page and line of this treatise; those from the latter are grouped according to the cadence represented, and the refer- ences are to page and line of Gardthausen's edition. V = Vat. Lat. 1873, of which all other existing codices are copies. The Clausula in Animianus Marcelliims. 171 Book XXI. (1) p. 125. 1. 18 multa et urgentia Omit et. Cf. curabat urgentia 254. 8 ; residua urgentia 294. 8. (2) 127. 21 coniectura fallerentur. interdumque Read fallerentur interdum. quae with Bcntlcy and Madvig. (3) 128. 7 prospecta revertatnur Perhaps proposita rev. Cf. I. 14. 28: II. 237. 22: II. 126. 11 proposita veniamus. (4) 129. 14 Vadomarii exorsos Read N^.^iOvcv^x\\'. for evidence that Amrnianus uses both forms of the genitive see p. 2j^. (5) 131. 19 diversorium rediit Read redit {Amrnianus always ac- cents rediit, interiit, etc. on the penult: v. p. 211). (6) 131. 20 agi conveniret F conveniet, which should be retained, in accordance with the usage of Amrnianus: cf. I. 20. 7, and Petschenig Phil, /o p. J48. (7) 133. 8 potuerunt et probari The sense demands poterunl, as Haupt has pointed out (Ind. Led. Berol. iSjf). (8) 133. 9 abiectius absolvam V abiectis : // is better to assume a lacuna with Wagner and Eyssenhardt than to read abiectius tvith Valcsius and Gardthausen. (9) 134. 17 sedulam et solitam F sollitam : r. 2jf) and velut propugnaturus {Gelenius).. The latter view seems to me preferable. The Clausula in Ammianus Marcellinus. 173 (27) 154. 26 stipatus armatorum V armorum, zvhich should be re- tained: cf. p. I J 4, note. (28) 155. 18 celso sistens Read insistens : cf. p. ijy, note. (29) 157. 11 ibant suam The verb is omitted in V: ibant Haupt {a suggestion on which he himself laid no iveight). Read traxerat ivith Gelcnius, comparing I. 112. 14 and 11. 68. 4 ff. (30) 157. 13 benivole responderant Read responderunt. (31) 159. 1 quoad licitum est A gloss on the foregoing words. (32) 160. 23 scripsit et heredem The word et {which is entirely out of place in the text) is not to be found in the earlier editions. (33) 162. 20 vixerat gustaverit Read vixerat gustavisse : the cor- ruption is due to the influence of the preceding word vixerat aided by a certain similitude in the endings -erit and -isse. (34) 165. 19 conponenda gravius /// my opinion a tvord {perhaps versabatur) has been lost after gravius : as the text stands, the relative clause zvhich ends in these words has no verb, for excitavit is the verb of the main clause. (35) 166. 12 sed cassum et umbratile V sede et assum, hence sed et cassum Accursius {Eyssenhardt), sed cassum Ge- lenius {Gardthausen). I am convinced that the proper reading is sed vicarium. This is just as near the read- ing of V as Accursius' sed et cassum, but in the latter conjecture et is indefensible and cassum is nearly synon- ymous with umbratile. On the other hand vicarium not only is recommended by the rhythm but adds point to the sentence. Jovian, riding on the bier of Con- stantius, received homage in lieu of the dead emperor : it portended for him imperium quidem sed vicarium, et umbratile ut ministro rerum funebrium. And there is especial point in the adjective in view of the con- fusion caused among the soldiers when he was pro- claimed emperor by the similarity of the names lovianns and lulianus {see XXV. 5. 6). 174 Austin Morris Harmon, Sentence-endings {arranged according to cadence) A (1) 1.26.28 agitari conperissent f^ nove res agitari conpissent; in this one needs only to correct conpissent to coe- pissent with Gelenius. On coepi and coeptus sum see Novak, p. 8o. (2) 102. 5 stetere cuneati V cunctanti, Reinesiiis cuneati, Read CLinctantes. (3) 103. 16 verbis hortabatur. The intolerable baldness of this expression makes it evident that something has fallen out of the text. The ivhole passage needs an over- hauling, for as Langen long ago pointed out {Emend. Ammian., Dilren, iS6j), the words cautior sui in the following sentence constitute an undeserved slur on Jidian^s courage of which Ammianus would have been incapable. As an attempt at reconstruction I offer'. verbis hortabatur et (factis), quoniam .... Augustus existimabat cautior sui. hostium(que) tela etc. (4) 118. 32 signis ostendentes Fsignibus {followed in Cod.Petrinus), v^ and Gelenius signis. For his signis read msigrnhw^i. (5) II. 250. 1 cruditate festinal^at V {cf. Eyssenhardt) festinabat : read firmabat. (6) 273. 20 quibus petebantur Pronounce qiiibus: see p. 228. (7) I. 70. 26 difficile pervadunt V pervaduntur, Haupt pervadunt. The passage should be so reconstructed as to retain pervaduntur. (8) 82. 13 munera curabant Valesius inserted munera: substitute, perhaps, munus. (9) 175. 21 febrium arescunt V arescentes, Gelenius arescunt; arescentes is perhaps defensible on the assumption that contra is a preposition. (10) 194. 18 eximit abruptis Read exemit {Gelenius). (11) 84. 11 exarserat in mains in is conjecturally supplied'. better exarsit in mains. (12) 191. 32 globos se inmisit se Gelenius : read sese or trans- pose. (13j II. 206. 29 secius hoc modo F rectus : read secus with Accursius, comparing I. 320. 23. {On the inconsistent accentuation hoc modo, huiusmodi see p. 210 The Clausula in AtiimiauHs Marcellinus. 175 B (14) I. 18. 11 lapsorum ac lasciviam Fad: read atque : cf. I. 16. 26. (15) 142. 5 dedendi se consilium. Read sese or transpose. (16) 159. 3 afuit quin caperer Ffuit: perhaps this reading should be retained. But quin may be pronounced as a dissyl- lable : V. pp. 22"], 22<). C (17) I. 145. 7 destinatas remearunt sedes Miiller inserted ad before destinatas : / should put it before sedes. (18) 145. 23 ad res consurrexit novas V consurrexerit {Clark). (19)11.161. 4 misitplebem Transposition must be resorted to {^\&he.m. misit conductam) unless one reads conducticiam m. p. (20) 196. 8 trucidari securum fecit Haupt conjectured secure fecit, Eyssenhardt reads securum efficit. In my opinion Ammianus wrote secure praecepit : cf. II. 173. 21; I. 62. 31; 94. 33; 137. 27. (21) 237. 19 portendatur norunt V portetur, Eyssenhardt porteu- datur. I should prefer •po?,c\i\\r : c/.poscebatur II. 168.12. D (22) II. 226. 3 esse [invidiam] sociam Gardthausen brackets invi- diam : read individuam with Valesius. (23) 271. 25 arduo in munimento conditos Set arduo after con- ditos : V reads ardor, which shows that the eye of the scribe ivas caught by ardor, below. Hence the trans- position might easily occur. The only irregular cadence which, on a priori ground, might be expected to occur in Ammianus is that type of A in which the word-division follows the tirst unaccented syllable ((ille properdbat). As Meyer has pointed out, there are some writers who use this clausula, though few of them employ it in any great frequency.^ He accredits Ammianus with sporadic use of it, on the basis of about 15 cases in 800 sentence-endings. But in this matter there is a discrepancy between Meyer's results and mine.^ Among the 1461 clausulae in Book XXI I find 10 cases, among 1811 sentence- 1 See p. 121, and Ges. Abh. p. 260, p. 263 Anm. 1. * The difference is probably due to the fact that long and careful study of the Histories has enabled me to ascertain a number of peculi- arities in the pronunciation of Ammianus which he was naturally unable to notice in the hasty examination of a limited material. 176 Austin Morris Harmon, endings 6: in all, 16 cases in 3272 clausulae, not one-fourth the proportion that Meyer's figures assign to Ammianus. Furthermore, a careful scrutiny of the preceding list will disclose that, in point of fact, there is very little evidence for the occurrence of this clau- sula in our author at all. Of the 10 instances in Book XXI, 4 are isolated ; in 2 of the 4 (nos. 6 and 27) the reading of the manuscript, which gives a reg- ular clausula, is every wa}' preferable, and of the other two (10, 16) we may say at least that transposition gives a better word-order in view of Ammianus' excessive fondness for traiectio. The other 6 instances form 3 cases of apparent responsion. But 2 of these cases must be ruled out of court, for in one of them (11—12) it is unlikely that the irregular cadences precede pauses, and in the other (25—26) the interpretation of the cadences as A is uncertain. In the remaining case (2—3), we have two sentences ending in Meyer's clausula, separated by about half a page of text : in this interval there is a quotation from Cicero, in which the same clau- sula terminates a sentence. At first sight this seems a striking ex- ample of responsion, motivated b}' the Ciceronian cadence. It is indeed the strongest example that I have been able to find in Am- mianus, but it is not as satisfactory as it appears. For in the first place, however natural such a procedure may appear to us, nowhere else in Ammianus is an irregular cadence in a quotation balanced by irregular cadences in the text.^ This case is therefore exceptional, and the very fact that seems to argue in favor of it is in reality an argument against it. Secondly, the first occurrence of the clau- sula is easily disposed of l^y revising the punctuation. Thirdly, the sentence that follows the quotation is a revocatio, marking a return to the subject. But elsewhere in Ammianus these revocationes always terminate in a regular cadence.^ Moreover, in the phrase ad explicanda prospccta revertanmr we have a figurative use of pro- specta which is unparalleled : the word usually emplo3'ed in this sense is proposita. On all these grounds I consider that we should read proposita here. 1 Cf. XV. 5. 23 : XVI. 1. 5 ; XIX. 12. 18 ; XXII. 7. 4 ; XXIX. 5. 24. In the fu'st citation, however, the reader should be warned that ipshts proniulgatafn does not correspond with fortnna revocatur^ but (in virtue of Ammianus' pronunciation ipsius^ on which see p. 211) with the prece- ding sententiam Tiillianam^ with which it also rhymes. * Cf. proposita veniaimis II. 126. 11 : proposittim revertanmr I. 14. 28 ; propo- siti revertanmr II. 237. 22 ; propositi revertetur L 228. 29 (where Gardthausen admits the mistaken conjecture rei^erteretur) \ restautia venianms I. 72. 3; The Clausula in Ammianus Marcellinus. 177 Turning- now to the instances of Meyer's clausula among the sen- tence endings, we find still less evidence than in Book XXI. Four out of the six cases (1, 2, 4, 5) are not founded on the manuscript, which gives in each instance a regular clausula. Another (3) is certainly to be held corrupt on internal evidence, and the sixth may be explained on the basis of the peculiar but not otherwise unsub- stantiated pronunciation qiiibus} None of these cases is supported by responding clausulae in the surrounding text. If the testimony for this clausula is weak, it is weaker still for the other types of A, and for the cadences B, C and D, for the admission of which there is no a priori argument. Yet it differs only in degree and not in kind, since there are examples of each of these clausulae that are superficially sound. More than that, we have among the sentence-endings (17, 18) an example of responsion in C quite as specious as the case in Book XXI just discussed, and I can cite one in D (II. 215. 15 proferrc gestiens = aequitatis tramitem) which can only be disposed of by transposition in both clausulae. For this reason it would not be logical to admit Meyer's clausula and exclude the others. Nor would it be logical to hold that cases of responsion in any cadence are valid, and to shut out the isolated cases, for in the first place the responsions are entirely too few in proportion to the isolated cases, and in the second place they are no more difficult to dispose of than the latter. Therefore we must assume either that Ammianus made an illogical and extremely in- frequent use of all these irregular cadences, or that he did not employ any of them at all. Between these alternatives the decision must be made, it seems to me, in favor of the latter, when the general condition of the text of Ammianus is taken into consideration. Were his text- tradition perfect, we should of course have a perfect reproduction of his clausulae; but, as we have already seen, it is so far from mstittita iavt revertamtir I. 201. 13 ; ordines r. II. 100. 24 ; ordinem r. II. 315. 25; fleximus r. II. 137. 27; dedinavimus r. II. 214. 18; tandem ad coepfa I. 75. 23 ; referamus ad coepta II. 103. 21 ; ad ordinem remeabo coep- torian I. 306. 32 ; (cf. II. 134. 18) redejindum ad texttim I. 23. 6 ; pergamns ad reliqua I. 284, 7; II. 66. 5; ad residua narranda pergamns II. 63. 15 ; rfde- amtis ad cetera II. 151. 22 ; hinc ad exorsa I. 128. 3 ; repetetur ordo gestorum I. 30. 29 ; redeam unde diverti I. 87. 14 ; II. 246. 10 ; regrediar institiitum II. 209. 28. The list is, I think, complete; transitiones^ marking the introduction of a new subject, are of course omitted. » See p. 228, 230. 178 Austin Morris Harmon, perfect as to be nearly the worst possible.^ Consequently, in case Ammianus consistently restricted himself to the use of the regular forms, we could not expect to tind a consistent reproduction of these forms in our text of his work. We should look for the introduction of a moderate number of irregular cadences of all descriptions ; naturally some few of these cadences would be in close enough proximity to suggest responsion, and in some few of them the cor- ruption would be latent. And this is precisely the state of affairs that we find in our text. The probabilities, then, are strong against the validity of any of the irregular cadences. We may therefore bring to a close our long discussion of the forms employed by Ammianus with the statement that except for two forms V and VI, used for the handling of long words and so infrequent as to play but an infinitesimal part in his rhythm, he seems to have used only the four forms I-IV, which, even in our corrupt text, are well-nigh universal. TYPES. To name the types in which the four regular forms occur I have adopted the system devised by Zielinski for the quantitative clau- sula. This consists simply in taking the longest form (IV) and as- signing a Greek letter to each place in it where a caesura may occur. Thus : ^ y (V t ^ 1] & Consequently a clausula having but a single caesura will be denoted by a single Greek letter, which will be /3 if the caesura follow the first syllable, ;' if it follow the second syllable, and so on: a clau- sula having two or more caesuras will be denoted by two or more Greek letters, each determined after the method just described. A clausula having no caesura is signified by the letter u. Under this nomenclature the types which occur in Book XXI (Coll. I) and among my sentence-endings (Coll. 11) are classified in the following list, which, for the second collection, also gives com- plete statistics as to the length of the first word in each type. » See p. 122. The Clausula in Amniianus Marcellinus. 179 Table of Types. Form I. Coll. I Coll. II nosse confingit 171 perculsus abscessit 140 353 509 periere conplures 143 509 posteritatis ostendit 45 obstinationis extremae 10 90 104 223 24 5 22 38 112 46 6 23 24 1 2 3] (5 210 223 passibus citis confluxerit Romam inferentibus plura seditionibus possint j'd 75 112 vilis et parva defensor et cautus aestimatur et salus instituere non pauca /3 7 24 sol aestimatur Thebais adpellatur ^r 1 2 hinc ad exorsa ^r6 1 1 3 (id prae me ferens) toleraturi 648 873 Coll. I Coll. II Form II. semper innocui 21 vertuntur indaginem 25 195 99 properabat intrepidus 41 velocitate letabilis 11 adulatione flagrantium 1 opifex callidus 18 104 28 suppeteret copia 7 civitatibus perviis 3 asper et vehemens 7 68 46 ademptis et dentibus 19 instrumenta non levia 17 lacesseretur ut ceteri 3 vivLis exustus est 8 7 26 fateri conpulsus est 8 374 199 99 28 yd 68 46 ademptis et dentibus 19 46 26 180 Austin Morris Harmon, Coll. I Coll. II 374 199 remeare j^ermissus est 9 continuare praeceptus est 1 (5^ 4 2 acta vel dicta sunt 1 cadavera tracti sunt 1 (Tyaneus Apollonius) haec et similia 1 (turn apud Naessum) (haec prosecutus est) Form III. /3 1 ^Y 3 1 ^6 2 r^ 1 885 202 Coll. I Coll. II magna decernebatur 25 y 37 55 monstrare poUicebatur 18 55 altiora meditaturum 9 perrumperetur impropugnata 3 collibus abdiderunt 284 6 285 540 memoria commendarent 197 540 confidentius inruperunt 51 incitatissimo tribuentes 8 foedus ut apparebat 16 yd 83 43 certabant et dignitate 13 43 documentis et vindicanda 12 felicitatis ut videbatur 2 de 35 36 rexerat pro praefectis 25 36 docebimus et aperte 9 exercitibus et salutem 2 advectae sunt per Catonem 2 obiecti sunt praeter morem 2 fuisse quod evenit 3 Form IV. tristium clamitantibus 6 15 discrimine penetrabile 9 laturus et necessaria 4 24 19 yds 4 yH ya 1 345 2 2 3 681 Coll. I y 18 Coll. II 15 yd 6 4 The Clausula in Amniiatiiis Marcclliuus. 181 Coll. I Coll. II 24 19 12 4 7 r& 76 iC 7^6 47 31 ^f 12 4 eminuit ut docebimus 4 /us Marcellinus. 189 Antepenultimate Words long short total "/^ short antepenult antepenult I (first word) 143 80 223 36 II (first word) 18 11 29 38 (last word) 1^00 74 174 43 III (first word) 368 207 575 36 IV (first word) 11 15 26 (last word) 23 8 26 663 390 1053 37 In the dissyllables^ leaving out of account the three collocations of which there are only two examples each, we observe that in every position in which they occur the ratio of short penults is approximately the same as the mean ratio of 23 per cent, the min- imum being 20 and the maximum 26. Compare with this the state of affairs in the antepenultimate words. Passing over for the moment the figures for IV, we find that the lowest proportion of short syl- lables under accent is 36, the highest 43, with a mean of 37.^ Between the highest ratio of short accented syllables in dissyllabic words and the lowest in antepenultimates there is a difference of 10 per cent, and between the two averages of 23 and 37 a difter- ence of 14 per cent. The dissyllables accordingly present a very constant ratio of approximatel}' three with long penult to one with short, while the antepenultimate words present an equally constant but considerably higher ratio of approximately three long accented syllables to two short. On the supposition that Ammianus chose his words with any re- ference to the quantity of their accented syllables the constanc}' of each of these ratios and the fact that they differ from one an- other cannot be explained. On the contrary, such a result is just what we should look for if we knew him to have observed nothing but accent. For it is obvious that in the Latin vocabulary the dis- syllables with short penult must stand in a certain numerical relation to those with long penult, and the words with short accented an- tepenult to those with long ; and it is highly improbable that the nvunerical relation would be the same in both cases. In any chance collection of dissyllables or of antepenultimate words, the one ratio ^ In IV the lai-ge proportion of short syllables in the first word is due purely to chance ; the small proportion in the second word, on the contrary, bears witness to the fact that the ratio is naturally smaller in pentesyllables than in trisyllables and tetrasyllables. See below. 190 Austiji Morris Harmon, would show itself in the diss3dlal)les, the other in the antepenulti- mates. The presumption is therefore that the two different ratios which we actual!}' find are these two natural ratios of frequency ; and this presumption is not difficult to confirm. In order to establish the natural proportion of longs to shorts under accent a count in the dictionary is the first means that sug- gests itself, but not the best, for it does not take into consideration the relative frequency of words. I made a small test, however, on this basis. For the dissyllables I selected the letter F in order to avoid prepositions, which would cause an abnormal proportion of long penults, and found that of the dissyllables beginning with that letter 24 per cent had a short accented syllable. For the antepen- ultimates I counted three pages at random under each letter of the alphabet, and found that 42.6 per cent had a short antepenult. A better means of proof would be afforded by prose writers, could we hit upon one who did not use ciausulae.^ Unfortunately it is only in modern Latinity that we can be sure, without investigation, that quantity is neglected, and I therefore selected Ritschl's Latin speeches {Opusc. V, 627—684) for examination. The count was made in the last two or three words preceding each heavy stop, and yielded 267 dissyllables, of which 25 per cent had a short penult, and 358 words with antepenultimate accent, of which 43 per cent had the syllable short. For the dissyllables it was also possible to make a test in hexameter verse, which admits all the varieties of scansion that they can assume. Choosing for this purpose the first Epistle of Horace, I found that 24 per cent of the diss3ilables occurring in it had a short penult. Of course we must not press these figures too close, for they are all of them founded on small counts. But they certainly show clearl}' that the natural proportion of short accented syllables to long is much lower in diss3'llables than in antepenultimate words, and that in the case of dissyllables this natural proportion must be about 3 long to 1 short, in the case of antepenultimates about 3 long to 2 short. Consequently the ratios which we found in Am- mianus accord with the natural ratios. To remove any lingering doubt we may pursue the investigation a little farther. Up to this point we have lumped all antepenulti- 1 Tliinking that this might be the case in Tacitus I counted the dissyllables occurring in the chapter-endings of the Histories and found a proportion of 36 per cent short ! This heavy proportion is abnormal — it is appai-ently due to his avoidance of the cretic-trocliaic clausula. The Clausula in Aunmanus Marcellinus. 191 mate words together. Let us now classify them according to length and see what ratio we find in Ammianus in trisyllables, in tetra- syllables and in pentesyllables. The facts are expressed in per- centages in this table. ^ I II III IV (first word) (last word) (first word) (first word) (la St word) "/o short o/o short "/o short <'/o short average tris3-llables 29 33 36 29 34 tetrasyllables 46 50 42 [63] 46 pentesyllables [38] 11 11 17 The results are illuminating. Each sort of word shows a different ratio, which is constant no matter in what clausula or in what place in the clausula the word occurs.^ Such a condition cannot be due to anything but the working of natural laws of frequency, and we ma}^ spare ourselves the pains of seeking confirmation of each ratio from outside evidence. In all words, then, in which the Latin language admits short ac- cented syllables, we find short syllables occurring in the clausulae of Ammianus in a proportion which shows no trace of intentional tampering with quantities, and which can only be ascribed to the influence of natural laws of frequenc}'. The conclusion therefore is inevitable that Ammianus was indifferent to quantity under accent. QUANTITY IN UNACCENTED SYLLABLES. It remains to be demonstrated that in unaccented syllables Kn\- mianus observed quantity by position and neglected vowel-quantity. His regard for position evinces itself in two ways : (1) in an effort to avoid positional lengthening in the case of the first unaccented syllable, and (2) in an effort to secure positional lengthening in the case of the second unaccented syllable.^ The effort to avoid positional lengthening asserts itself in all forms, but onl}^ in types with ;' caesura [nosse confingit). For in all other * Words of 6 syllables are too few to give a ratio of any value. * In the two percentages bracketed the count is a very small one (19 tetrasyllables as the first word in IV, 24 pentesyllables as the first word in I). The percentages given under III are based on the largest counts. Statistics as to the length of the first word as well as that of the last are given for all forms in the tables of types, p. 179 ff). * The first of these two observations is Meyer's {Ges. Abh. II. 264 — 265), the second is my own. 192 Austin Morris Harmon, clausulae with the exception of I ii the first unaccented syllable is the penult of a word with antepenultimate accent {Claudius Caesar, opijex callidus etc.) and of necessity is always short, except in rare cases of abnormal accentuation.^ In I [i {sol aestimatur) Ammianus might easily have shortened the syllable in question, but as a matter of fact it is long in all 24 cases and long by position in all but 3.^ In types with y caesura {y and ;' (V in each form) the tendency to avoid positional lengthening manifests itself clearly. These are the statistics. makes does not make position position total Hiatus Vowel -f cons., V owel + 2 Final -7it. ,-ns cons. -f cons. Form cons . -f- vowel cons. -\- vow el I 60 486 38 22 17 623 II 17 133 8 7 8 173 III 21 73 2 3 6 105 IV 2 2 1 5 100 694 48 32 32 906 It will be remarked that cases in which a syllable ending in -nt or -ns precedes a vowel (redieruw/ infecto) are registered among the combinations which do not make position. Although according to classical usage -7tt and -ns should suffice in themselves to lengthen the syllable which they terminate, it is certain that they do not in Ammianus, for when such a syllable precedes the ;- csesura it is customarily followed by a word beginning with a vowel, while when it precedes the () ceesura in types in which our second rule is observed it is followed by a word beginning with a consonant.-^ These syllables are therefore treated exactly as if they ended in a single consonant. ' Five cases are registered under III in our table above : I. 28. 17 Amano disparanUtr ; I. 43. 21 in Aegypto trucidantnr ; I. 27. 30 CalycaJmts interscindit ; I. 178. 30 de'inceps prohibcrent ; I. 130. 32 deinde sunt progrcssi. Tliey show how far Ammianus went in his indifference to quantity. ^ This must not be interpreted as evidence of a desire to lengthcfi the syllable. In this type Ammianus paid no attention at all to quantity. See pp. 193, 196. ' In the first case there are 27 instances of -nt and 5 of -ns before a vowel (as in redierunt infecto) against 3 of -nt before a consonant {remanerent magistris) : in the second case there are 26 instances of -nt and 7 of -ns before a consonant (as in nesciens missum) against 2 of -nt and 1 of -ns before a vowel {snfficiens aqua). The phenomenon is due to the nasalization of n. The Clausula in AuDiiiaiius Marcclliinis. 19 3 This point understood, the language of the table needs no further interpretation.^ And its testimony is extremely clear. We find that when the first unaccented syllable is followed by caesura it makes position in less than 3 per cent of the cases in form I, less than 5 per cent of those in form II and less than 6 per cent of those in form III. As for form IV there are only 5 cases among the sen- tence-endings, one of which lengthens the syllable by position. The material is so small that we must bring in further testimony. Among the clausulae from Book XXI I note that of 9 cases of IV with y caesura position is made in onl}^ one; and in the 17 cases of IV ;' cited on page 182 there are only 3 in which the syllable in question is lengthened. Consequently in this form as well as in the others Ammianus' inclination to avoid position manifests itself. It is plain, therefore, that when the first unaccented syllable came before a caesura, Ammianus did not like to lengthen it by position. But he had no scruples against allowing it to be long by nature, for it is thus long in 30 per cent of its occurrences. This proportion leaves no room for assuming the slightest preference on his part for a short syllable, since we may ascribe the predominance of shorts to the fact that almost all finite verb-forms have a short final syllable. 2 We may note further that Ammianus was very little troubled by hiatus, for it occurs in 11 per cent of the clausulae. Let us turn now to a consideration of the state of affairs in the second unaccented syllable. The tendency here is not to avoid position, but to secure it. It is not displayed in all forms, but only in I and II, and is not quite universal within these limits. In I j3 there is no inclination at all to lengthen the second unac- cented syllable, which is short in 12 of the 24 cases. In I y and II ;' the tendenc}' comes to the surface. Here the syllable follows the caesura, and is in the one case the first syllable of a penultimate trisyllable (nosse confingit) and in the other the first syllable of an antepenultimate tetrasyllable (semper innocui). Examination shows that in I ;' the syllable is long by position in 1 The fact that to the ear of Ammianus a syllable terminating in a vowel does not make position before a word beginning with 2 consonants {venire praecepit) is in accordance with the prevailing practice of the poets and we need not dwell upon it. ' The proportion is approximately the same in all forms : in 1 it is 3G per cent, in II 27 per cent, in IH 42 per cent. This is as close an agreement as we could reasonably expect. 194 Austin Morris Harmon, 79 per cent of the cases, long by nature without making position in 17 per cent and short in 4 per cent. In II ;' it is long by pos- ition in 76 per cent of the cases, long by nature without position in 16 per cent, and short in 8 per cent. To ascertain how far these proportions vary from the natural, I took as the basis for an estim- ate the penultimate trisyllaliles and antepenultimate tetrasyllables that begin the clausula in various forms and types (as venire prae- cepit, conjluxerit Romam). Here I found that words like venire had the first syllable long by position in 31 per cent of their occur- rences, long by nature without position in 34 per cent, and short in 85 per cent, while words like conjluxerit showed 52 per cent long by position, 20 per cent long by nature only, and 28 per cent short. These ratios may not be very accurate, for they were not based on large counts ; but they are accurate enough for our purpose. They show clearly that there is a marked tendency toward po- sitional lengthening of the syllable which we are considering. Though the actual results attained are similar in both forms, the tendency is stronger in I than in II, for in the latter form the natural ratio of syllables long by position is much higher than in form I.^ We come now to the d and ;' cV types, in which the second un- accented syllable precedes a caesura (as passiZ'//^ citis, vilis et parva). The two tables which follow will show that position is sought in I d and ;' 6 and in II ;' cV, and that it is neglected in II (5 and in all types of III and IV with 6 caesura. aj Quantity observed makes position does not make position total cons. -j- cons, vowel -^2 final -nt, -ns vowel -|- cons., hiatus Form consonants -|~ "^'owel cons. -|- vowel I (J 201 7 1 14 223 yd 110 1 10 112 II 7 d 46 1 47 357 7 3 15 382" * In I y there seems to be a slight inclination toward conscious lengthening- of tlie syllable befoi'e the caesura when the S3^11able follow- ing it is short, as in remanerejit magistros. It is not at all consistently carried out, for it is only illustrated in 7 sentence-endings, while thei-e are on the one hand 15 cases in which the short syllable is not preceded by a lengthened one (as in ruentes aperta^ ferieiida dederimt)^ and on the other hand 10 in which the lengthened syllable is not followed by a short one (as in tandem perveni). Yet in view of the fact that each of The Clausula in Annniauus Marcellinus. 195 « b) Quantity neglected makes position does not make position total cons. 4" cons. vowel -[-2 final -nt, , -ns vowel -f- cons., hiatns Form consonants + ■ v^ow el cons. -|- vow 'el lid 15 4 2 7 1 29 \\\d 160 29 7 329 15 540 yd 35 4 7 1 47 di 12 1 22 1 36 IV (all 6 types) 12 2 3 13 1 ^31 These tables require very little comment. At first glance one might be tempted to include III ;' (V among the clausulae in which position is sought, inasmuch as it has its monosyllable long by position in 75 per cent of the cases. But the ratio is purely natural, for in I /3 {sol aestimatur) and in III ^ t {poterant nee cavcri) the monosyllable makes position to precisely the same extent. Our investigations have shown us that under certain circum- stances Ammianus made a distinct effort to avoid positional leng- thening in the first unaccented syllable and to secure it in the second. It should be mentioned further that in 28 cases of form II with C caesura {vivus exustus est) and 6 of IV with /> caesura {fiden- tius absolutus est) the next-to-the last syllable uniforml}' fails to make position. This fact, however, may be quite unintentional, for even if no attempt were made to avoid position here it would seldom occur.^ Consequently it is hardly on a par with the phenomena that we have been discussing. We may note, though, that the syllable is long by nature 6 times in II and once in IV. When it is not in caesura {semper innocui etc.), it is bound to be short as a result of the penultimate law. In forms III and IV the third and fourth unaccented syllables show no trace of any attention to position. But the fact that they are so often both long {cernebatur) and so rarely both short {tribu- entes) appears to be indicative of a slight abnormality which I should refer to Ammianus' desire to avoid the hexameter close. these two peculiarities is so rare, tlie occurrence of both together in so many cases cannot be set down to mere coincidence. It points to a futile desire to avoid the hexameter tag — ^-^ --^ . ' The combinations of participle and auxiliary that would naturally occur most frequently do not give position {tractns, tracta, tractum est : tracti^ tractae^ tracta sunt). 196 Austin Morris Ilarnion, Our investigations thus far have been based on statistics from the collection of sentence-endings. If we extend them to the inte- rior clausulae we shall find that there also the same tendencies to- ward the avoidance of position in the first unaccented syllable and the effort to secure it in the second assert themselves, but to a less extent. It will be of advantage to make this evident in such a way as at the same time to summarize our results for the final clausulae. The estimates for interior clausulae are founded upon Book XXI. In form I, type ;' {nosse confingit) when the clausula is final the syllable preceding the caesura fails to make position in 97 per cent of the cases, and the syllable following the caesura makes position in 79 per cent; when the clausula is interior the respective per- centages are 87 and 68. In I y6 (vilis et parva) final clausulae show the syllable preceding the ;' caesura positionally short in 97 per cent of the cases and the monosyllable long by position in 98 per cent ; interior clausulae in 95 per cent and 91 per cent respectively. In I (3 (passihus citis) the first unaccented syllable must always be short in virtue of the penultimate law: the second displays posit- ional lengthening in approximateh^ 90 per cent of the clausulae both final and interior. In II ;' [semper innocui) the syllable preceding the caesura fails to make position in 94 per cent of the final clausulae and in 82 per cent of the interior; the syllable following the ceesura makes position in 76 per cent of the final clausulae, and in 72 per cent of the interior. In II y(^ (asper et vehemens) the syllable preceding the / caesura fails to make position in 100 per cent of the final clausulae, 94 per cent of the interior ; the monosyllable makes position in 98 per cent of the final clausulae and 85 of the interior. In III ;' and ytS {magna decernebatur) the syllable before the cae- sura is not lengthened by position in 94 jjer cent of the final clau- sulae and in 86 of the interior. There are onl}' 5 cases of IV with ;' caesura among the sentence- endings, and 9 among the clausulae in Book XXI ; one example in each case has the syllable before the caesura positionally lengthened. In I ^, in II /:; and II 6 and in all types of III and IV without ;' caesura quantity by position plays no part. We find, then, that Ammianus' inclination to observe quantity by position is nowhere carried out with strict regularit}', and that it is considerabl}' less prominent in interior clausulae than in final. The explanation of this fact is that observance of quantity in the The Clausula in Atnniiaiuis Marcellitms. 197 clausulae is subordinated to observance of accentual rhythm. A clau- sula quantitatively imperfect is now and then (often, it is to be presumed, unconsciously) admitted by Ammianus because it satis- fies the accentual requirements, which are more important ; and such clausulae are more frequent in the body of the sentence than at its end, because a cadence which precedes a slight pause is much less deeply impressed on the ear than one which comes before a full stop, and any quantitative fault that it may have is therefore less obvious not only to the reader but to the writer as well. ORIGIN OF THE ACCENTUAL CLAUSULA. In our study of the nature of Ammianus' clausulae we have de- termined that his rhythm is based on the recurrence of four ac- centual cadences : I r\j r\j rv P^ r\j II rO r\j r\j r^ r^^ rsj III 1^ f\j rsj r^ r'^ r^ rsj IV (^r\jr^^rsjr\jr^r\jr\j Though the rhythm in these cadences is primarily accentual it is not purely accentual, for in the first and second unstressed syllables quantity by position plays a certain part in the form of a tendency to shorten the one and lengthen the other. It is beyond dispute that these clausulae derive their origin from corresponding quantitative forms. The metrical prototypes, in the establishment of which the researches of Meyer and Zielinski have featured most prominently, are 1 ^ ^- 2 -^ ^ 3 -^ — - 4 '- ^ - The clausula 4 is rare: it is chiefly used, like its accentual deri- vative, as a means of handling long words, and not all writers employ it. The other three, however, are extremely frequent, and show a steady increase in popularity. Without taking into con- sideration the modifications of these forms produced by substitution and resolution we find that in entire purity they constitute nearly 45 per cent of Cicero's sentence-endings and 69 per cent of Cyprian's clausulae. Ziehnski would interpret all of Cicero's clausulae in terms of these cretic-trochaic forms. However it may be with that theory (for which I do not hold a brief), it cannot be denied that Cyprian's Traxs. Coxx. Acad.. Vol. XVI. 13 Oct., 1910. 198 Austin Morris Hariuo)i, clausulae are to l:)e thus interpreted, for beside the three pure forms the only clausulae that he uses with any frequency are ^ -^ ^ — : — ^=^ itineris errore ^ ^ v.. ^ : -1- :=i ipse teneatur j^^ — : -:!- w ^ rursus imposuit These are obviously all modihcations of form 1, each produced by the resolution of a single long. All together, the three simple forms and the three moditications of the tirst form are found in about 92 per cent of Cyprian's clausulae, and are therefore become practically universal in him.^ The connecting link between these quantitative clausulae and the accentual clausulae in Ammianus is to be found in the coincidence of accent and ictus in the former. Just as through coincidence of accent and ictus the hexameter-close in Latin usually presents the accentual scheme fu r>^ ij \ r^ r^ r^ r\j . This latter clausula, being the accentual equival- ent of a resolved form of the metrical clausula (^. ^ j ^^^^i) should logically have gone out of use, as did the accent scheme of the other resolution -^ _ .--I ^ ^=^, but it is conserved, as we have said, by Sedulius and many others. Its retention seems to be solely due to the fact that its metrical prototype was the Ciceronian esse videatur clausula which is recommended b}' all grammarians in chorus from Quintilian on. Although in . this re- * These words were written in 1908. Ow^ing to an unfortunate coni- bination of circumstances I am unable to turn to account several dissei'- tations which have appeai'ed since then. 200 Aitstin Morris Harmon, sp;_'Ct and in the disuse of IV Sedulius differs slij^htly from Ammianus, he is in essential agreement with him in his attitude toward quan- tity, for he too disregards quantity under accent, and observes quantity by position in unaccented syllables. Failure rightly to appreciate this fact has materially lessened the value of Candel's work upon Sedulius.^ Yet he himself noted that Sedulius in I ;' and II ;' freely allows the syllable before the caesura to be long by nature, but does not allow it to make position.^ And there is another obvious peculiarity of the same sort (not noted by Candel) in the clausula i■ Cic. /. .-. ; Quint. IX. 4. 125. ^ Tor a discussion of the meaning of the word pei-iod see Blass, Rkythmen der asian, ti. rom. Kunstprosa, p. 'd ff. 202 Austin Morris Harmon, We have seen that there is no essential distinction in Ammianus between the clausulae which end sentences and those which end interior kola. In both cases the same forms and types occur. "We fomid, however, that in the interior clausulae he displayed somewhat more laxity in his observation of positional quantity than in the final clausulae because it is the final clausulae that dwell longest in the ear. And we noted in passing another difference which was reserved for fuller consideration here, in the point that neither in the relative frequency of the forms with reference to one another, nor in the relative frequency of the various types of each form is there close agreement between the statistics furnished from Book XXI and those from the collection of sentence-endings. As to the fre- quency of the forms the statistics are here expressed in percentages. Book XXI vSentence-endi I 45.5 48.8 II 27 11.3 III 24.2 38 IV B.2 1.8 Following the hint given b}' this comparison I have examined the facts in Book XXI ; they are Interior Final I 45.6 45.7 II 30 11.1 III 20.9 40.4 IV 3.3 2.6 The relative proportions of the forms are obviously the same in the final clausulae in this book as in the other nine books, though I is slightly less frequent, IV slightly more frequent than usual. But the relative proportions in the interior clausulae are quite different. Form II shows a great increase, form III a great decrease in fre- quency, while I and IV remain aliout the same. We find, then, that II is preferred over III before minor pauses and that III is much more favored than II as fiual clausula. If we pursue the in- vestigation into the typology of these cadences, it becomes clear that thr falling off in III as an interior clausula is all in type 6 icollibiis abdiderunt) ; the falling off in II as a final clausula is marked in all t3i)es, but greatest in () (opifcx callidus)} Furthermore, though * The fact that II ('lausulae with f caesura (v/vus exiistus est) are more comniou at the end of the sentence than in the interior has uo signif- icance; it is simply because verbs are more frequent at the end of the sentence. The Clausula in Aiuiuia)iiis Marcellinus. 203 I is equally common both at the end of the sentence and within it, the tyjje I 6 is in slightly greater favor as an interior than as a final clausula, and, strangely enough, I /3 (50/ aestimalur) is more common as a final clausula than it is within the sentence. Beyond this slight contrast between interior and final clausulae, there is little art superficially discernible in the arrangement and the sequence of the cadences. In general they seem to follow one another almost at hap-hazard, and there is little attempt to group them on principles of balance and contrast. But passages that are more carefully constructed sometimes occur. Far and away the best of these is the lofty flight of rhetoric in which Ammianus epit- omizes the rise and dechne of the Roman commonwealth (XIV. 6. 3—6). This is well worth quoting in its entirety. Tempore quo primis auspiciis in mundanum fulgorem surgeret ut victura dum erunt homines Roma, ut augeretur sublimibus incrementis foedere pacis eternae Virtus convenit atque Fortuna plerumqiie dissidentes, quorum si altera defuisset ad perfectam non venerat summitatem. eius populus ab incunabulis primis adusque pueritiae tempus extremum quod annis circumcluditur fere trecentis circummurana pertulit bell^., deinde aetatem ingressus adultam post multiplices bellorum aerumnas Alpes transcendit et fretum, in iuvenem erectus et virum, ex omni plaga quam orbis ambit immensus reportavit laureas et triumphos, iamque vergens in senium et nomine solo aliquotiens vincens ad tranquilliora vitae discessit. ideo urbs venerabilis post superbas efferatarum gentium cervices oppressas latasque leges fundamenta libertatis et retinacula sempiterna velut frugi parens et prudens et dives Caesaribus tamquam liberis suis regenda patrimonii iura permisit : II, I III, I III I, I III III III 16 ir 1/ Id ir I/' !;'() I 7 (J Ir III II r6 I (5, Id I7 II I I m I I I 204 Austin Morris Harmon, el olim licet otiosae sint tribus I pacataeque centuriae 11 et nulla suffragiorum certamina II set Pompiliani redierit 7 securitas temporis ; II per omnes tamen quotquot sunt partes terrarum I ut domina suscipitur et regina, III et ubique patrum reverenda cum auctoritate canities II populique Romani nomen circumspectum et verecundum. Ill We need not undertake a minute analysis of this passage, for its rhythmical structure is quite apparent. Even in the sentence which opens it and in the two sentences at its close there is more regu- larity displaj'ed in the disposition of the cadences than is character- istic of Ammianus' ordinary style. But their structure is not nearly so studied as that of the four connected periods which embrace the whole history of Rome. The first of these, describing Rome's infancy, is made up of four kola, while the other three, dealing respectively with Rome's youth, manhood and old age, are of three kola each. While all these kola are about of the same length, it is worth while to notice that in the first period we have three long kola of 13 syllables each, followed by a shorter one of 10 syl- lables, in the second, two of 11 syllables followed by one of 8, and in the third and fourth a long central kolon of 13 syllables (which in the fourth is broken into two responding kommata) between shorter kola of al)out 10 syllables. Equally artificial is the responsion of the clausulae, all in I until we come to the last kolon of the third period, which is in III (/aureas et triumphos), the change in rhythm adding emphasis to the kolon, which contains the climax of the whole thought. From this climax through the medium of a ca- dence in II we are brought back to the old rh3thm again, in the two responding kommata and in the close of the sentence. It should be noted, too, that the responsion extends even to the types. This is certainl}' a remarkable piece of composition : artifice could hardly be carried further. But it stands quite by itself in Ammianus, of whose general style one can get a satisfactory idea from Book XXI. Though resi^onsion is not regular in Ammianus, it is conspicuous. The three more favored clausulae occur so freely that in their case it would be difficult to show this in any way except by referring to the text itself. Form IV, however, being much less frequent, furnishes us with interesting results. Its occurrences in Book XXI are as follows: p. 125, 9; 126, 29; 127, 13, 23; 130, 13, 18; 131, 6, 21,30,32; 133,2; 135,33; 136,1; 137,11,12,14,19; 138,7,27; The Clausula in Animiamis Marcellimis. 205 141,4; 142,2,20; 143,3,32; 145,32; 146,17,21; 148,17; 149, 8; 150,34; 153,6, 11; 155, 8, 11; 156, 8; 157, 21; 161, 7, 9, 18; 162, 16; 163, 6, 13; 164, 34; 165, 1, 8, 11, 22. Instead of occurring regularly once in every page, the cadences are mostly in groups ranging from 2 to 7 clausulae. But there are also numerous more or less isolated occurrences. The two facts point at once to the predominance of responsion in Ammianus, and to the lack of S3'stem in it. Responsion of course brings it about that in short passages of Ammianus' text the relative proportions of the clausulae vary con- siderably. But any passage of three or four pages will be found to reproduce quite closely the ratios which occur in Book XXI, and which may be mentioned again here as the general norm of use in Ammianus : I 46 II 27 III 24 IV 3 In proof of this consistency in practice I cite the relative per- centages of the cadences in the sentence-endings of the nine books that I have examined. Being linal clausulae, they naturally do not correspond to the ratios in continuous composition, but the uni- formity which exists in them testifies to a like uniformity in general st3le. XIV XV XVI XVII XVII XIX XXIX XXX XXXI Average I 48.8 51.2 56 46.7 44 42 49 53.9 52.1 48.8 II 9.5 12.1 9 14.6 11.2 8.9 11.7 11.8 11.7 11.3 III 41.1 35 34.3 37.5 41.6 46.8 36.2 34.2 33.9 38 IV 0.4 1.5 0.5 1.1 3.2 2 2.9 2.1 1.8 There are discrepancies in these ratios, to be sure, but they are really small — never large enough to indicate any abnormal difference in composition. The incessant repetition of so limited a number of cadences gives rise to two phenomena which deserve brief comment : the produc- tion of unintentional clausulae and of prolonged clausulae. In m}' text of Book XXI I have signalled the existence of numerous ca- dences which upon the whole do not seem to me to be intentional because the pauses which they precede are very slight. ^ But there ' Naturally I do not maintain that I have drawn the line bet^veeu intentional and unintentional clausulae with any gieat accuracy ; the definition is, and must needs l.e, subjective in large measure. 206 Austin Morris Harmon, are also cadences in plent}- which I have not noted, which do not precede pauses but occur in the midst of a grammatical construc- tion.^ Tliese cadences certainl}- cannot be intentional, for the}' con- tradict the whole theory of the clausula, which requires that the clausula should terminate a word-group and not break it. They ought, therefore, theoretically speaking, to have been eliminated ; they occur probably because Ammianus' choice and arrangement of words was so determined b}' rhythm at the end of the clause that ' the numbers came ' in spite of him where they were not in place. To the same cause we must also assign prolonged clausulae like pueriiiac ianpus extremum and aetdtem ingrcssiis adi'tltam, and interlocked clausulae like insidiis fallcrctur occi'tltis and celsiore fidi'icia repugnarent. The interlocked cadences are rather rare ; the prolonged ' dactylic ' rhythms are numerous. There is great danger of error in ascribing to the clausula any profound influence upon the manner of Ammianus. Inquiry would better be directed into the influence of Ammianus' manner upon the clausula. But for such an inquiry there is as yet too little material to give any satisfactor\- results. INFERENCES BASED UPON THE CLAUSULA. Chapter III. Matters Of Proxun'Ciatiox. While the pronunciation of Ammianus in the main conforms to that which we regard as classical, the clausula reveals many parti- culars that are important. They are for the most part phenomena either of accentuation or of syllabication, and we shall discuss them under these two captions. The illustrative material cited is drawn from the entire text of the Histories, although, in the case of phenomena which occur frequently, no attempt has been made to register every instance. ACCENT. In the construction of Ammianus" cadences phrase or sentence accent, as distinguished from word accent, plays very little part. I find no instances in which this factor produces a shift of word- ^ The reader will find examples in almost any page of Book XXI. The Clausula in Aminiamts Marcclliuus. 207 accent, — .such a shift, for example, as ap])ears to occur in ilium patreni and the hke in Plautus and Terence. To its influence, however, we must attribute encHsis and prochsis, of which the ex- amples in Ammianus are frequent but not especially remarkable. As a rule they are monosyllaljles, including forms of esse, prepo- sitions, conjunctions, and pronouns. But proclitic dissyllables, usu- ally prepositions, sometimes occur, as in I. 11.2 tunc apud Siden, II. 41. 21 dimicans inter primos, I. 235. 27 discubuit inter ceteros. It is noteworthy that Ammianus' usage is not entirely con.sistent, since on the one hand words ordinarily atonic sometimes bear accent, and on the other hand words that are ordinarily accented are sometimes atonic. Thus monosyllabic forms of esse are not uncommon as the first word in I (so I. 9. 18 scopulis sunt controversa ; 16. J 4 inditutn est cognonientum ; II. 224. 23 iustuni quid sit ignoranti), and vice versa we find monosyllabic nouns deprived of their natural accent in cases like I. 167. 27 sagittariorum pars maior; 256. 19 mea mens mtgurat; II. 267. 17 splendore liinari nox fulgens. So there are many diss\'llal)les that seem to have an abnormally heavy accent (as I. 14. 7 pubc tc'nus amicti; 16, 26 atque macstitiain-^ 235. 13 erat acturus; 256. 17 esse vertendum; 256. 30 iter si'iuin pracire; II. 136. 19 saevum quideni d rudein ; 144. 9 ille Cretrnsis), and a few that are used as if they were atonic, of which the most conspicuous case is I. 51. 16 noyi potest corpus. Such peculiarities may fairl}^ be as- cribed to the working" of sentence-accent, although we cannot ex- clude the possibility that in some cases the stress or the lack of it may be effected arbitrarily in the effort to secure a clausula. Though the clausula teaches us little about sentence-accent, it brings out a number of interesting points in regard to word-accent. Let us first consider the composita. In uiagisquam and potiusquam we have two compounds not previously recognized. For the one I may cite I. 248. 24 magisquam consultius and II. 127. 29 magisquam severus: for the other, I. 298.3 potiusquam fluit, 137. 12 potiusquam simultate, and II. 41. 8 potius- quam tdel)atur} Another new compound is rtiamtum, as in II. 162.4 ctia Inst. XV. 29; cf. XV. 10. * Hence II. 105. 21 aliquando Romanorum is to be emended into ali- qiia7ido Romanum, comparing the instance last cited. » E. g. Priscian, Inst. V. 63 and Part. 26; cf. Sommer, p. 101. * Inst. VIII. 35 ; Part. 127 ; cf. Sommer, pp. 102—103. 210 Austin Morris Harmon, The most interesting observation of this nature in that in hoc modo the accent falls upon the noun, whereas in Jmiusniodi and various other compounds of the sort the noun is enclitic. hoc modo : I. 162. 25 paulatim hoc modo ; II. 85. 10 prudens hoc modo; 176. 16 inscdens hoc modo; 1.328. 24 autem hoc modo huiusmodi : I. 13.14 cogitabat hiiinsmodi ; 33. 1 huinsmodi scru- tahaiiir: 313. 15 huinsmodi forma est; cf. I. 148. 10; 236. 13; II. 178. 30 uniusmodi : II. 205. 26 uniusmodi pcrfcrentcs -modo- I. 248. 5 qiioqnomodo corrigcudnm; 305. 19 qnodammodo spirant; II. 49. 6 tantummodo tcncbatnr; 96. 31 tantununodo vulneratis -modum. : I. 28. 2 admoduni pattca ; II. 20. 26 propcmodnm in- acccsso Word-accent in Ammianus conforms almost entirely to the classi- cal usage ; there are, however, a few noteworthy points which must be enumerated. Penultimate vowels followed by a mute and a liquid do not take the accent unless they are long by nature. Thus we have magnae delubra (I. 285. 18), visitur ant dcliibrum (II. 237. 11), and longius circnmldtrans^ (I. 305. 16), but — tenel:)ras : I. 84. 2 tenebras adfulsisse ; II. 222. 1 1 tenebris amcn- dasset; 172. 7 tenebris reptabamus latebris: II. 119. 16 latebris amendarunt; 197. 11. /. oportunis inlecebris: I. 288. 1 rapicbatur inl; II. 14. 24; 123. 31 ; 271. 20 integrum: I. 51. 11 absolvitur integris; 118. 26; 198. 29; II. 175.4 muliebri : I. 1 66. 24 muliebri sexu lugubres : II. 171.22 higubres inchidebat The results coincide again with the testimony of the gramma- rians, which is opposed, however, to that of the Romance languages. Lindsay is apparently right in assuming that in vulgar speech a .short penult followed by a mute and a liquid took the accent, while in educated speech it did not do so.- The only case in Ammianus of a verb which has shifted con- jugation is oriri (II. 234. 11 oritur potest; I. 16. 19 adoritur Pauhim; 335.22 inde exoritur; cf 208.21; II. 192.15). This phenomenon, however, is not confined to late writers.^ 1 On the quantity of the a in latmns see Marx, Hiilfsbiichlein^ s. v. * Lindsay, p. 164. * Neue, Formenl. III. 253. TJie Clausula in Aiiniiianus MarcclliiiHs. 211 In the clausula fortuito monstravit 'I. 303. 17) we may note the penultimate accent oi fortuito. In all perfect forms endin^- in -iit the accent falls upon the penult : interiit: I. 50.4; II. 36.10; 90. 15; 130.5; 160.4; 207.13. introiit: I. 248. 11 ; II. 59. 9; 78. 29 ; 118. 3 abiit : I. 268. 1 ; II. 139. 23 transiit: II. 116. 31 desiit : II. 36. 3 For this also we have testimony from other sources.^ Both the perfect subjunctive and the future-perfect indicative seem to have an accented penult in the first and second persons ])lural ; in I. 57. 8 legerimus is subjunctive, while in 11. 10. V^ fecerimus ^.Yl<\ (31) egeritis are indicative. I find no instance of either form with antepenultimate accent.^ There are several cases in which the third person plural of the perfect indicative appears to be accented on the antepenult, not only when the endings is -eruut, but also, oddly enough, where it is -ere. Thus II. 145. 7 oppositis coeperimt; 147. 6 proccsserunt lon- gius; 215. 29 coinpulerunt sedes (where V, however, has compulit], and I. 75. 19 inviae fuere (cf. II. 121. 2fuere gestarum) ; II. 109. 17 intercessere pauci; 194. 22 parave re casus. As it is hardly possible to do away with the cases in -ere by changing them all to -erunt, we must exjDlain them by the inference that the}' derive their accent by analogy from that of forms in -erunt, which, though exceptional, are legitimate. It is an interesting example of reciprocal influence, inasmuch as the usual long e in erunt is thought to have come from -er-e. In the case of genitives in -ius we may assume that the accentu- ation varied from one word to another in ordinary speech. Among the words of this sort employed by Ammianus totius (I. 102. 23 : 154.27; 160.31; 211.11; II. 156.6) and tinius (II. 270. 20) have penultimate accent. On the other hand, I find antepenultimate ac- cent in ipsius (I. 58. 10; II. 220. 2b), illius (I. 21. 7; II. 86. 1 ; 151. 3) and alterius (I. 131. 15; 314. 18). The only marked lapse from correct pronunciation in the direc- tion of Romance development is to be found in the penultimate ^ Cf. Serv. ad Aen. I. 451; Lindsay, p. 182; Sommer, p. 612 ; Bednara, Archiv fiir lat. Lex. XIV. 850. - See Lindsay, p. 500 and Sommer, p. 623. In II. 206. 24 quoque voierinuts is ambiguous, for quoque may be pronounced in three sj-llables (see below). 212 Austin Morris Harmon, accentuation of iiidiciolnm in the clausula noti iudicioli est nostri (II. 119. 30 and 146. 11), which is a distinct vulgarism. ^ But he ac- cents malleolus on the antepenult (I. 244. 14; II. 99.11), and also Pute'olos (II. 147. 9). The evidence for the accentuation of words borrowed from other languages, which has heretofore been somewhat scanty, is con- siderably increased by the material which we get from Ammianus, who often employs foreign words in the clausula. Far the greater part of these words is derived from the Greek, as we should ex- pect, or from some other language through the mediation of the Greek. Such words are not affected by the penultimate law, but they bear an accent derived from the Greek. In support of this statement I shall adduce first a list of words borrowed from the Greek or through the Greek, which according to the penultimate law should be accented on the penult, but are accented by Ammianus on the antepenult. OviJiyya^ appellamus I. 127. 1 6()iL,0PTag. appellamus I. 161. 17 Graeco sermone (Siyo/iitjrig I. 200. 21 vocamus (Xjr67i(>ov6iv I. 201. 1 fragmentis et cylindris II. 274. 12 architecti^ promittebant II. 49. 8; cf. II. 18. 15 et prima species luis pandemus adpellatur, . . . secunda epidemus, . . . tertia loemodes I. 176. 8 monstrat amphicyrti I. 200. 24 heroi consecratis I. 281. 17 Misopogonem appellavit I. 294. 19 Epiphania dictitant I. 2.33. 22 ; cf. Bcfana operatur Adrastia I. 42. 5 ; cf. 269. 10 Antiochiam venimus II. 58. 13; Antiochiae claudi I. 293. 16; cf. I. 25.6; 29.6; 153.27; 195.19; II. 59.4; 143.25; 259. 27 Alexandria et Hermupolis 1.331.2; cf. 329.22; Alexandriae contigit II. 93. 15 Nicomediam pergit II. 83. 18; cf. 84. 23; Nicomediae clades I. 125. 11 • Cf. filioli\ magistro in Commodian {Iiis/r. II. 26. 6, p. 45 Ludwig)^ Faviola and Liliola in Venantius Fortunatus (VIII. 1. 42; 3. 43). See Lindsaj', p. 164 ; Sommer. p. 103 ; Nyrop, Gramm. histor. d. I. Franfaise I (2nd. ed.), p. 161, 137, 7; Jespersen, Lrhrh. d. Phonetik p. 192 §198. "- From u{)-^iiiy.T(><;^ not any^ai-ATMv. V. Saalfeld, Tois. Italogracc. s. v. The Clausula in Amniiamis Marcellinus. 213 Apamiam positi II. 140. 7 prope Ba.siliam II. 207. 18 Abdera visitur I. 275. 9 Ancyram redit I. 285. 32 ; cf. II. 60. 22 Edessam venit I. 222. 3 Arethusae captus I. 51. 18 Calycadnus interscindit I. 27. 30 ingrossus est Perinthum I. 266. 23; cf. II. 274. 30; 275. 18; Apris et Perintho II. 103. 5 Aegyptum petens I. 271. 24; Aegypto circumlata I. 306. 1 ; cf. 306. 12; 295. 21; 43. 21 Euxinus appellatur I. 281. 7; Euxino ponto II. 204. 15 sunt in Hellespontum II. 246. 17 ; cf. 85. 2 ; contentus Hellesponto I. 160. 23 ; cf. II. 242. 5 Cherronesus est propinqua I. 280. 30 ; cf. II. 90. 31 colonia Miletus II. 126. 9 protentam ad Pachynum I. 242. 8 contingit et Abydon I. 275. 20 est Criumetopon I. 278. 26 Darei pater I. 327. 24. Seleuci regis I. 27. 31 ; Nicatoris Seleuci 325. 32 Aesopi cavillationibus 1 II. 214.7 magnus somniabat Alexander I. 45. 22 ; cf. II. 86. 31 ; rapuissent Alexandrum I. 321. 14; cf. 152. 22; 309. 21 ; vicum Alex- andri I. 119. 25; cf. 321. 20; credatur Alexandre I. 214. 6 Menander comicus I. 257. 23 Miconas videbis et Lachetas II. 149. 29 apud Platonem legitur II. 39. 29 Arachotoscrenem appellatam I. 335. 29 transiere Thermodontis I. 278. 19 cognominantur Acontisma II. 101. 30; cf. 81. 28 Tios et Amastris I. 277. 29 These words obviously derive their accent from the Greek : it .should be observed, however, that they are emancipated from the working of the Greek ultima law. For instance, the word cyliudris in being accented on the antepenult not only violates the Latin law because of its long penult but also the Greek law because of its long ultima; both languages (though for different reasons) demand an accent on the penult. We must conclude, therefore, that in such words the antepenultimate accent is brought over from the ' See p. 168 ff. regarding this form of clausula. Trans. Coxn. Acad., Vol. XVI. 14 Oct., 1910. 214 Austin Morn's Hannofi, Greek casus recti (cylindrus = xrAn'(^()oi;), and then retained through- out the Latin inflection in accord with the spirit of the Latin lan- guage. This slight concession to the Latin genius is significant, for it indicates that the mode of accentuation with which we are deal- ing was not peculiar to Ammianus, but was at least more or less general in his time.^ The next list contains words which Ammianus accents in Greek fashion upon a short penult. ^aOLlia et reliqua L 122. 2 ut hvijd^ii Graeci dicimus stultum, et noctem evcfQODjV et furias Evfitvidug I. 281. 8 metuens tyrannidis ^ II. 106. 9 pansa chlam3^de I. 83. 14 Rhodopen et fretum II. 253. 7; cf. 101. 25 Anaphe et Rhodus I. 127. 20 Helicen exsurgens I. 278. 25 Meroe et Delta I. 298. 17 dicitur Orsiloche I. 281. 11 portus Acone I. 278. 3 Jovis filius et Danaes I. 28. 5 latitudinem Sauromatas I. 280. 18 ; II. 235. 1 memorantur Odrysae II. 102. 6 Leontino Gorgia II. 209. 22 Anaxagoras adfirmat L 127. 2; cf. 275. 30 Pythagorae decrevit I. 69. 16 dicitur et Socrates I. 258. 2; cf. II. 146. 14 sollertia Dinocratis I. 303. 13 idem Arsaces II. 51. 11 ; cf. 121. 30 Aristoteles adfirmat I. 232. 12 Aristomenes e latebris II. 160. 7 Hermogene defuncto I. 241. 4 Asclepiades philosophus^ I. 293. 20 philosophus Simonides 11. 169. 19 lyrici Bacchylidis II. 40. 3 Euripidis sepulchrum II. 102.1 ;cf.Sidon.Apoll.IX. 234 Thucydides exponit I. 175. 27 > See pp. 218—220. ■^ The word occurs also in Sedulius with this accentuation : see p. 220. note 1. ' On the accent of philosophus see below, p. 217. The Clausula in Ammiatius Marcellinus. 215 inLsse Persidos I. 328. 16; Persidis I. 28. 24; 319.4; 321.6; II. 54. 18; Persidem 74. 17; 206. 11; Perside I. 321. 26 Hesperidas appellant I. 303. 4 clauditur Maeotidos I. 276. 23. Chalcida transmissi sunt II. 3. 27 Propontideni et Thracias I. 322. 11; cf. 11. 44. 11 insulaeque Stoechades I. 73. 26 atque Cycladas I. 275. 2 sunt Symplegades I. 277. 13 Teredona porrigitur I. 323. 5 The third list comprises a few words that have an accented ultima. Thebais adpellatur I. 117. 17 Copton et Antinou I. 302. 22 Seston et CallipoUn I. 275. 19 Poliorcetes appellatus est II. 9. 9 Perseus memoratur I. 28. 4 Tyaneus Appollonius I. 258. 6 This list is short, but it should be noted that on the analogy of Thebais we can postulate nominatives with accented ultima from the oblique cases of such words as tyrannidis, chlamyde, Persidis, Maeotidos, Chalcida, Propontideuu and probably Teredona. We find, then, in Ammianus a great number of instances in which the Greek accent is taken over with the borrowed word. Against these I can set only a few exceptional cases in which the Greek accent is not preserved. Exceptions are proportionally most frequent among those words which in Greek have an accented ultima. With Seston and Copton in the last list we may compare the following words. choros I. 279. 12 chamiilcis I. 119. 26 Thessali I. 282. 21 Adiabenam I. 310. 25 lyricus I. 18. 11 hydraulica I. 21. 19 hieroglyphicas I. 118. 16 physicae I. 118. 29 mystica I. 171. 19; cf 258. 7 In these cases the accent is thrown back, and its place is appa- rently determined by the penultimate law. But in Aegyptidcae i\. 296. 17 j and Constantidcas (I. 247. 12j it goes back only to the a, which is short. This is paralleled by the statement of a grammarian 216 Austin Morris Harmon. {de acccntilms liber: K. III. 525. 27) : quae autem habent c inter / et u in paenultimo loco, corripiuntur, ut portions Gallicus Italicus Ale- mannicus Romanicus : excipiuntur ea quae habent a, ut Taurinacus. The phenomenon is perhap.s attril^utable to a tendency to accent the broader vowel.^ Against Teredona, in which the accent is probably on the ultima in the nominative, we may set Amdzones i\. 278. 9 : II. 235. 22) and especially Chalccdona (I. 267. 12: 272. 10: II. 89. 27), with recessive accent. There is nothing to show how Ammianus accented the nominative in these two words. In Paphlago (I. 239. 18) it appa- rently falls on a short penult : if this assumption is correct, it may be derived from the oblique cases iPaphldgonis)?- But it is ill arguing from isolated instances. From our limited material it wovild seem that only unfamiliar proper names retain their Greek accent when that would fall upon the ultima — that familiar words, and especially common nouns, throw their accent back to a place usually but not invariabl}' determined by the penultimate law. Ammianus almost always retains the Greek accent when it falls upon the penult or the antepenult. A notable group of exceptions however, is formed by place-names ending in -la, all of which he accents on the antepenult, whether they come from the Greek or not. Thus Bithynia I. 37. 34 : 276. 5 : II. 85. 1 Sicilia I. 43. 22 Dacia I. 48. 17: II. 101. 20 Syria I. 76. 7 Aegyptia I. 119. 4 Mesopotamia I. 123. 3: 154. 18: 208. 18 Pannonia I. 135. 1 : 189. 19 Armenia I. 222. 2 Hiberia I. 241. 1 Mygdonia I. 277. 6 Paphlagonia I. 277. 27 Cilicia I. 309. 32 iMedia I. 311. 22 Assyria I. 324. 9 Phrygia I. 324. 25 Arachosia I. 335. 25 Cajipadocia II. 59. 19 > Cf. hidicioli above, p. 212. * See p. 171. The Clausula in Animiatius MarcelUmis. 217 Galatia II. 87. 6 Lycia II. 87. 10 Asia II. 125. 15 Francia II. 208. 22 Thracia II. 240. 20 Pamphylia II. 245. 26 Macedonia II. 245. 27 Moesia II. 252. 18 This practice is of course due not only to the long usage of Greek names in -m like Mesopotamia, but to their analogy with names purely Latin like Italia, Graecia. It would have been utterly impossible to preserve any rational distinction. The clausula The- baidem et Libyain (I. 302. 17) shows that Libya (Aii-iv)i) belongs in this category. From Eusebia (I. 94. 15; 12G. 11; 240. 7j, ecclesia (II. 160. 3) and philosophia (I. 326. 14) we may perhaps conclude that not only names of countries but also all other Greek loan-words in -ui were accented on the antepenult by Ammianus.^ No such convenient and sensible rule prevailed in later times- -in fact, so great confusion arose that even native Latin words in -ia occasionally had penultimate accent. 2 There are in Ammianus a few compound words with exceptional accentuation for which the reason is not clear to me : theologi I. 127. 16 philosophus I. 298. 20; II. 169. 19 lotophagi I. 22. 6 galactophagi I. 333, 14 Beyond these exceptions I have observed only the following : Helena I. 279. 22 Homerus I. 296. 32 ; 276. 6 ; 257. 27 ; 334. 15 Milonem II. 221. 2 Theodoras II. 163.5; 169. 1 Nicaea II. 82. 13; 83. 26; 89. 16; 111. 18 Homerus and Helena may perhaps be accounted for as names known mainly from books and Latinized through long currency in the speech of educated men : they are not quite on a par with names like Alexander, for instance, which on account of its frequency in every-day use could not be Latinized so easily. A Greek slave would probably have answered more readil}^ to Alexander than to Alexander. The pronunciation Milonem as against Platonem may > Cf. K. III. 522. 9. « E. ff. I'ltalie, from Italia. 218 Austin Morris Harmon, be due to the influence of the Latin name Milo, but I can see no satisfactory reason for Theodorus. The penultimate accentuation of Nicaea is especially odd in view of the fact that the modern names of the two prominent cities formerly called Nicaea, Isnik in Bith3-nia (to which Ammianus refers), and Nizza in Italy, both testify to an original antepenultimate accent. We cannot suspect Ammianus of ignorance, for having seen much military service in those parts, he probably had visited the city, and certainly had often heard its name spoken. Can it be due to some whim of his own or of his imme- diate circle that the name is not derived from the name of the daughter of Antipater, but from the adjective vr/.aXo^'i^ The upshot of our investigations is that words having penultimate or antepenultimate accent in Greek are with few exceptions ac- cented on the same syllable by Ammianus, and that even among words with accented ultima some (apparently such as are less familiar) retain the accent on that S3dlable. This result tallies with testimony from two other sources, — from the Latin grammarians and from the language itself. The grammarians, to be sure, are not all in agreement. Diomed and Servius, followed by many later and lesser lights, hold that Greek words should be accented in Greek fashion when the Greek inflectional forms are preserved, but in Latin fashion when the Latin terminations are used.- This would sanction Ammianus' pronuncia- tion Persidos, but not Persidis. hi his case no such distinction can be drawn, for if we can put any faith at all in the text tradition he uses Greek and Latin forms indiscriminately and accents all alike in the Greek fashion. But this distinction has the ear-marks of pedantry upon it. The pseudo-Sergius, who gives us the fullest discussion of the question (K. IV. 526. 9—528. 27), is at once more liberal and more trust- worthy. His passage is too long to quote in its entirety, though it merits reading as an example of the work of the Roman grammarian at his best, displaying unusually careful observation mingled with a modicum of pedantr}-. According to him, Greek words when they keep the Greek forms of inflection must retain the Greek ac- ' Cf. Steph. Byz. s. v. 'kiytica Sk nQonaQo^vioyioi. al rf' eari Nixcciog, to i)-riXvxot' N/xaia. Compare also the fact that Nicaea in Phocis had penul- timate accent (Forbiger, A/t Geog. III. 612), and the tradition that Nicaea in Bithynia was founded hj people from this latter Nicaea (Memnon in Photius. Bihl. 233 Bel-heri). 2 Diomed K. I. 433. 4: Servius in Do7i. K. IV. 427. 10: 525. 8: ad Georg. I. 59. The Clausula in Animianus Marcellinus. 219 cent. Similarly, Latin words inflected after Greek models must be accented as their models are accented ; for instance, Scipiades, Mem- miades with stressed penult. But Greek words taken over into the Latin inflectional system may be treated in two ways ; the}' may be accented either on the Greek basis, as ae'ris^ aethe'ris, Evander, tyrannus, or on the Latin basis, as deris, ae'theris, Evander, tyrdnmts. But although the Greek system may be followed at will, it must be used correctly if at all : in quibiisdam enim nominibus licet vidcre plerosque, recti casus ambiguo tenore deceptos, mendose oblicos pro- ferre, ut qui in patrico casii Evandri et tyranni primam syllabam acuunt potius quam mediant, nullam secuti rationem. This grammarian, then, freely concedes the propriety of accenting Greek loan-words in Greek fashion as Ammianus does, and even acknowledges, though only to censure, the practice of carrying antepenultimate accent through the inflection regardless of the quantity of the final .syllable. Donatus and Sergius go eveiT farther than our unknown, for they no longer admit a choice between the Greek and the Latin basis of accentuation, l^ut insist upon the Greek : in the words of Sergius (K. IV. 483. 29) the rule is stated, Graeca autem sins accentibus pro- nuntianda esse noscamus} It has seemed best to me to dwell upon the precepts of the gram- marians at some length in order to bring out the value of the passage in the pseudo-Sergius, which has heretofore received little attention. The evidence of the language itself may be despatched briefly. A certain amount of information as to the pronunciation of loan- words is obtained from the late poets, in whom we find false quan- tities which can only be due to Greek accentuation. For example, Venantius Fortunatus employs scansions like Cycladas (and often -ades, -idis and the like), Ardtus, eniblema, probleuia, idolutn.'^ But the bulk of the evidence is afforded by the Romance languages, in which the rule holds that words introduced into Latin from the Greek retain the Greek accent in their Romance derivatives, except when the Greek word was oxytone.'^ In a general way, then, we learn nothing from Ammianus that is startlingly new. His testimony is chiefly valuable because it emphasizes with enormous weight a feature of late Latin pronunci- * Donatus (K. IV. 371. 27) saA^S, sane Graeca verba Graecis accentibus efferimus. This is quoted from Diomed verbatim, but the siguificant proviso of Diomed, si isdem Utteris emintiaveri»tus^ is left off. "^ See Leo's metrical index. ' Meyer-Liibke, Roma?!. Gramm. I. p. 3-4 : Gramm. Storico-comp. delta Ling. Ital. p. 84. 220 AHsti)i Morris Harmon, ation that we have been inchned to overlook, and because it shows that this accentuation was not confined to vulgar speech, but was in vogue in the best circles as early as the fourth century. It would be beyond the scope of this treatise to consider how much older than Ammianus the custom of Greek accentuation may be. In any case such an investigation would bear little fruit at present, owing to the paucity of data. Further study of Latin prose- rh3^thm may eventually help to solve the problem.^ We come now to the matter of loan-words derived from languages other than the Greek. In the lists of Greek words given above a number of words like Calycadims are cited, which were borrowed from some other language through the medium of Greek : their treatment is of course in no wise different from that of pure Greek words. So in Ldranda (I. 11. 10) and in Artogc'rassa CAQTCcyfjQai'. II. 123. 18) Ammianus' accent agrees with the Greek. The curious name Caenos Gallicanos (I. 38. 1) evidently is influenced by the Greek : it may be corrupt, for Gallicanus, with which it appears to be connected, uniformly has an accented penult in Latin (I. 201. 21 : II. 60. 7 ; 228. 15). Bardxmalcha (II. 5. 24) and Nadrmalcha (II. 6. 24; 21. 29) are not to my knowledge mentioned elsewhere, so that we are ignorant of the accent which they bore in Greek. How Am- mianus pronounced Amida is uncertain, for we find both Amida (I. 168. 2) and Amida (222. 6). Perhaps he was uncertain himself in the matter. In Amano (I. 28. 17) and Naessum (II. 71. 13; I. 246. 12 ; 247. 30) Ammianus accents the antepenult, whereas in Greek the accent is certainly on the ultima in the one {rb 'Af/avor) and probably in the other {iVicior>6<^). The pronunciation of Abarne (I. 167. 10) with antepenultimate accent is paralleled by the Greek form "i(jf«(>ro^, but the word itself is a transliteration of 'A^uitvii. A similar thing occurs in Bczabde (I. 253. 18; 222. 16), a transliteration of B%iCi^^ ^n^j rsj i See Miiller de Re Metr. p. 249 ff. : Lindsay, p. 142 ff. : Sommer, pp. 144, 145. * It is possible that some cases which I have listed under forms II and IV {adulatioiie Jlagrantintii : decerneret in pla7xitie) should be read with synezesis as I and III. But I liave preferred not to assume it when unnecessary. * Priscian K. II. 287. 8 classes Troia with Italia. Phrvgia, Lydia, etc. Cf. Part. K. III. 467. 12. * In pure Latin words it is very rare : see L. Miiller, de Re Metr. p. 264. Harper's Lexicon (and others') register Pompejus {trisyl.) or Pompeius [qiiadrisyl.)., plebeiics {-ejus) and Fon tents— on what grounds I know not. The Claitstila in Amniianus Marcellinus. 225 only does it occur freely, but it is the rule rather than the exception. At least we may safely assert it to be the rule in the words Trai- anus, Pompeiiis, plebeitts, Aquileia, Troia, Fonteius, for the clausulae cited, in which / counts as a syllable, are the only clausulae in which they occur.^ But in the clausula xit amnt in flammam (11. 131. 4) aiimt has consonantal i, eius often has it (e. g. I. 235. 2; 264. 6; II. 20. 22; 35. 28; 91. 3; 99. 1), and mains occurs several times with consonantal i (I. 80. 25; II. 45. 31; 136. 7), but not to my knowledge with syllabic /. Furthermore, intervocalic i seems to be always (except in Traiamis) consonantal when it is pre-tonic; thus aiebat I. 94 5; II. 175. 14 akbant I. 318. 22 maiora I. 23. 28 maiore I. 90. 2 maiores II. 145. 18 projecit I. 116. 28 eiectat 11. 19. 30 seiunctum I. 119. 25 Since the syllabication of i regularly appears in certain words, it follows that we are dealing not so much with a metrical expedient on the part of Ammianus as with a characteristic feature of his ordinary pronunciation. Is it peculiar to him, or does he share it with his times ? Lack of positive information as to the pronunciation of his period precludes our answering this question definitely, but it may be pointed out that Ammianus was a Greek, and that pre- cisely this peculiarity was noted by Consentius as a fault in the pronunciation of Latin-speaking Greeks.- Coming now to the instances of the syllabication of n, we may remark first that the word behia is always a trisyllable in Ammianus (I. 15. 11 ; 283. 30; II. 32. 13; 46. 31). In this, of course, he agrees with classical usage. After 5 in suesco, snadeo and the like u is always syllabic. suesco I. 89. 15 adsuesco L 137. 19; 11. 232. 28 adsuetus, consuetus I. 11. 20; 88.8; 113.1; 136.31; 271.2; IL 112. 19 etc. adsuefactus I. 269. 26; II. 38. 16 suadeo L 124. 23; 308. 31 ; 318. 17 ; H. 247. 8; 262. 21 suasorum I. 219. 15 A fairly extensive search in the poets for an instance of the quadri- syllabic scansion of Pompehis has not proven fruitful. For Trota see Sen. Troad. 824, 853. ' Except those in which the word containing i comes last and which are consequently indecisive ; for example, ventttm est Aqm'leiam (I. 49. 31) may be read either as III or IV. - Consentius K. V. 394. 11 ff. : Lindsay p. 45. 226 Aitsti)i Morris Harmon, In the usage of the poets suesco not infrequently is trisyllabic, suadeo occasionally.^ It is not surprising, then, that Ammianus should make use of this pronunciation, but very surprising that he should use it always. At once the most wide-spread and the most striking phenomenon of this nature is that u may count as a syllable in the combination qu-. Though the following list of instances is long, it is by no means exhaustive. The words cited are classified for the sake of convenience into three groups according as qu heads a post-tonic tonic or pre-tonic syllable. Dialysis in post-tonic syllable aquis undabundis I. 127. 1 aquae furtim I. 177. 13 aquis et externis I. 280. 4 equis et morigeris I. 134. 15 equis concidit I. 318. 11 equi terrebantur II. 32. 5 eqiios aut aurigas II. 145. 15 eqiiis velocissimis II. 201. 8 eqiiis evolarunt II. 244. 2 antiquum timens I. 242. 27 antiquam sobolem I. 279. 16 antiqiia sed deserta I. 303. 2 longinqiia pertimescens I. 64. 18 longinqiia formidabat I. 236. 7 aeqiium nee laudari II. 57. 9 aequum nee sileri II. 180. 3^ propinquo convectari II. 185. 13 oblique tenebantur I. 218. 31 sequens Lunae I. 295. 29 (cf. I. 71. 18; 79.6) (enclitic -que) legibusqiie discrepantes I. 72.7; cf. 86.9; 168.9; II. 236.2; 245. 28 ; 256. 22 ; 268. 26 ^ uterque etc. I. 75. 26; 230. 8 ; 252. 17; II. 15. 17; 17. 2 quisque I. 286. 7 ; II. 4. 30 plerique I. 28. 13; 36. 17; 331. 13; II. \'6. ,32 usque I. 286. 4 ; II . 110. 16 ^_ * With, reference to suadet see also Serv. ad Aen. I. 857 secundum nattiram dtiae sunt syllabae^ sed multi trisyllabnm putant. Cf. Lindsay, p. 53. * This justifies aeqiium nee taeeri I. 207. 11, where aequum is inserted by Gelenius. ' Only a few instances out of many score are here cited. The Clausula in Af^niiu'anus Marcellinus. 227 quoque II. 143. 25 ; 206. 24 ubique II. 274. 24 (enclitic -quam)— quisquam I. 16. 32; 128. 28; 145. 16; 146. 11 ; 154. 6; 231. 22; 258. 17; 272. 1; 281. 18; 286. 31; II. 265. 16 perquam I. 189. 5 (p. gnarus) = 147. 20 = II. 104. 12 = 126. 31 = 190. 18 ; I. 260. 29 (p. scientissimus) = II. 2. 21 ; II. 50. 25 (p. oportunum) = 214. 30 ; I. 15. 30 ; 185. 28 ; 331. 1 ; II. 167. 31 ; 235. 10 (trisyllabic in all the cases that I have found) umquam I. 14. 14; 91. 7 numquam I. 15. 25; 70. 21 ; 167. 13; 260. 5; 325. 6 nusquam I. 300. 30; usquam 319. 30 potiusquam I. 298. 3; cf. I. 65. 24; 124. 13; 137. 12; II. 41. 8 Dialysis in tonic syllable casu propinquabant I. 11. 13 urbi propinquaret I. 91. 22 ambitioso propinquantis II. 104. 11 editum aequabant II. 14. 20 celsitudinis aeqiiatae I. 179. 20 ominis loquamur II. 144.22 Pannonias et Quadi II. 71. 1 ; cf. 216. 32; 239. 30; I. 134. 5 divisa quattuor I. 72. 24 modis quattuor I. 127. 17 ambigerentur quaedam I. 32. 27 membra quaedam I. 123. 28 opinantur quidam I. 137. 14 (relative pronoun) relaturi quae audirent I. 7.5; cf. 99. 24; 135. 26; 218.10; 277. 17 ; II. 16. 11 ; 162. 18 ; 207. 6 ; 219. 13 exposuisse quod elegi I. 65. 26; cf. 66. 13; 140. 15; II. 61, 23 discant qui ignorant I. 119. 7 iste qiiem videmus I. 94. 3 adventanti quas petebat II. 214. 21 pacem quam poscebant I. 137. 6; II. 58. 18 nocilura quam delictis II. 125. 8; cf. I. 66. 30; 261. 16 Dialysis in a pretonic syllable recreati et quiete I. 11. 11; cf 99. 18; 152. 4; II. 199. 14 nimio quassatus II. 21. 24 peritos quaeritabant I. 173. 6; cf. II. 45. 9 regale quaerebatur I. 32. 18 : cf. 292. 31 228 Austin Morris Harmon, iusta querelarum I. 130. 4; II. 195. 14 tumultuando querebatur I. 288. 31 eum sequebatur I. 98. 16; cf. 178. 21 Combination of dialysis in tonic syllable with shift of accent quies data I. 225. 29 qiiies daret II. 48. 31 quies dedit II. 189. 29 qiiies parta II. 115. 17 quies prima II. 193. 12 quies oportuna 11. 22. 8 quibus inhiabant I 269. 26 quibus sperabatur II. 98. 21 quibus petebantur II. 273. 20 quibus habitant II. 234. 8 quidem sed deformibus II. 233. 12 quidem aliquotiens I. 247. 31 (p. 146. 1. 27) Although this phenomenon is frequent, it is not constant like the vocalization of n in shcsco, sitaiico. In the collection of 1811 sen- tence-endings which has often heretofore supplied us with statistics there are in all 71 clausulae in which a word containing qu appears.^ In 35 of these clausulae the n counts as a syllable, while in 36 it does not. On this basis we may conclude that in general u is syllabic in about 50 per cent of the instances in which it follows q. It should be pointed out, however, that this is merely an average, and that the ratio is not the same for all words. In reliquus and similar words syllabication does not take place at all, for the manifest reason that it would be impossible without a prior shift of accent from the antepenult to the penult. With this exception qu may count as a syllable, as far as I know, in any word, no matter what position it occupies in the word. The rela- tive frequency with which it so functions in any given word depends upon the word itself rather than upon than the position of qn in the word. In some words syllabication is optional, while in others it is the rule. It is optional in -qtie, occurring in about half the cases. In pronouns and adverbs ending in -qttani, in potiusquam and the like, it is very nearly universal, for out of 12 clausulae containing such words, -qnaui counts as a dissyllable in 11. The relative pronoun is oftener a dissyllable than a monosyllable. Syl- ^ This does not include clausulae like sufficiens aqua^ in which the qu follows the last clausula-accent. In these cases either pronunciation would give a regular clausula. The Clausula in Afnnn'ajius Marcellifius. 229 labication is certainly the rule in adjectives like aequus, and is uni- versal in the nouns equus and aqua. It is universal also in quies, both in the nominative, where it is combined with a shift of accent (qiiies) and in the oblique cases {qiiiete). \\\ some other words, such as Quadi, quattuor and querela, it seems to be universal, but they do not occur often enoui^h to conclude this with certainty. In quaeritabat, in sequcbatur and in propi}iquabaut, among- other words, s3dlabication is optional. So unusual is this feature of the pronunciation of Ammianus that at first it seems almost incredible. But it is certain beyond all per- adventure, inasmuch as the strength of the evidence which supports it is in no wise conditioned upon the validity of the h3'pothesis that all of the clausulae in Ammianus were originall}^ ' regular.' Even if we reject that hypothesis, we must still admit that ' irregular ' cadences are very infrequent and exceptional. This admission ampl}' suffices to establish the point in question, for clausulae such as those cited above are too frequent to be classed as ' irregular.' The truth comes out unequivocally if we look at the matter in the light of statistics. In 1811 sentence-endings there are 22 which, taking Gardthausen's text as it stands, unquestionably present irregular cadences, and, as we have just seen, 35 which become irregular unless the syllabication of // after q be admitted. To count these 35 clausulae as irregular would not greatl}' alter the relative status of the regular and the irregular cadences. But it would bring it al:)Out on the one hand that irregular cadences, though constituting but 3 per cent of the total number of clausulae, would occur in 50 per cent of the clausulae which contain the combination qu, and on the other hand that clausulae containing qu, though amounting only to 4 per cent of the total number of clausulae, would form 60 per cent of the irregular cadences. It is plain, therefore, that to avoid creating an inexplicable abnormality we must admit that all or nearly all the apparently irregular clausulae containing the combination qu are in reality regular. And they cannot l^e regular unless qu counts as a syllable in them. Not only is the principle certain in itself, but there is ample justification for applying it wherever its application will make a cadence regular. On this point it will take but little reflection to convince the most sceptical. For instance in assuming, in order to explain a single clausula,^ that quin counts as a dissyllable, we are sup])orted by the analogy of the relative pronoun. If quod may so count, why not quin ? And in asserting that quod ma}' so count, ' I. 159. 8 afuit quin caperer. v. p. 175. Trans. Conn. Aoad., Vol. XVI. 15 Oct., 1910. 230 Austijt Morris Harmon, we are governed by the fact that the ordinary pronunciation of quod would create an abnormally large number of irregular cadences containing this word— a fact that hardly calls for proof, as it should be evident merely from the number of instances cited in the list above. But to remove any possible doubt we may point out that in the collection of sentence-endings the relative occurs in only 8 instances, of which 4 are irregular if we give the word its usual pronunciation, whereas the monosyllable et occurs in 97 clausulae, not one of which is irregular. While this comparison is not as im- pressive as it would be if we took the entire text of Ammianus into consideration, it nevertheless shows clearly that the relative is not handled like other monosyllables. Hence we must infer that it is not on all occasions monosyllabic. Again, in the three words quies, quibus, qiiidein we have asserted not only that the // counts as a syllable but that it bears the accent. This remarkable phenomenon is far harder to admit than any other application of the princijile of syllabic w. Yet it must be admitted, for in every single clausula in which the word qnics appears it is treated as if it were an antepenultimate trisyllable like requies instead of a dissyllable. 1 Since this fact cannot possibly be due to the blind working of chance, the onl}' admissible explanation is the obvious one that to the ear of Ammianus the word had the effect of an antepenultimate trisyllable— an effect which can have been secured only by pronouncing it qi'iies. Thus the evidence for quies is just as strong as the evidence for, let us say, subinde. And from quies we get the key to the explanation of the apparently irregular ca- dences in which quibus and quidem appear.^ It is very clear, then, that in Ammianus the syllabication of u after q must be admitted. In trying to account for a feature of his pronunciation so contrary to good usage as exemplified in the poets, one is naturally tempted to see in it an idiosyncracy due to his Greek birth, inasmuch as transliterations like Koivtoz. indicate that to the Greeks the Latin u seemed syllabic.^ This consideration should not be ignored, yet we must not overrate its importance. In the first place it should be ^ Except in patitur quies (II. 67. 32), where either trisj'-llabic or dis- s^'llabic pronviiiciation of qides would give a regular form. ^ That quibus should occur in 3 appai-eiitly irregular clausulae is in itself suspicious, in view of the fac^t that it is rareh' to lie found in a regular cadence. ^ This is shown not only by the fact that the u is represented by a vowel, but even more conclusively by the accent which falls upon the vowel. The Clausula in Anntiiaints Marcelliints. 231 kept in mind not onl\- that the Histories were intended to appeal to a more or less cultivated ])ublic, but that the}" were actually read in sections before an audience and were received, if we are to believe Libanius, with great applause. Consequentl}' we should be chary of assuming the existence of any conspicuous idiosyncracies or Hellenisms in the pronunciation of Ammianus ; the}- would not have escaped attention and censure at the first reading. ^ Further- more, there is some little outside evidence to show that this phen- omenon was not entirely foreign to the Latin ear. Lachmann long ago pointed out that in the earl}' poets the word aqua is in several instances trisyllabic (aqua).^ This is certainly the case in Lucretius VL 552 and 1072, and again in VL 868 if we follow Lachmann in substituting aquae for laticis on the authority of an unknown grammarian.'^ The same scansion is found in Ennius in one place {Ann. 1 68 Vahlen), and perhaps in another [Ann. 379j.* Lachmann, seconded by Bergk, maintained its occurrence in the drama also ; this Ritschl stoutly denied,^ and the Plautine scholars have acquiesced in his view. However it may be with this matter, which in the absence of any new evidence it would be out of place to discuss, it is certain that u after q in Plautus was not entirely without effect upon the metre, for Lindsay notes that words like loqui resist ' iambic ' shortening of the ultima. He explains this by saying" — "so to the ear of Plautus qu almost made a preceding vowel long by position, unless ive say that loqui etc. sounded to Plautus something like a trisyllable.'^ Surel}^, ceteris paribus, the latter of his alternatives is preferable. After the time of Lucretius this license apparently is avoided by * Of course this argument does not apply with the same force to an inconspicuous feature like the syllabication of intervocalic ?', which we have hesitatingly ascribed to Ammianus' Greek origin, and wliich affects so few clausulae that it may well have passed unnoticed. ^ See his note on Lucretius VI. 552. * In the latter passage Lachmann's reading, vigorousl}' defended by Bergk and as vigorously opposed by Ritsciil, has been adopted by Bockemiiller and by Munro. Giussani retains laticis. * Cf. Bergk, Opusc. I. 309, 345. In Atui. 379 he would read erugit for exerngit. In Ann 155 Vahlen rejects Tarcuini corpus (Servius) in favor of exin Tarqiunium (Donatus). » Lachmann ad Liter. VI. 552; Bergk, Cpusc. I. 72; 345: Ritschl, Opine II. 600, 604 ; Schroeder, Stndemund's Studien II. 20. * Lat. Lang. p. 87. The italics are mine. The fact that such words are occasionally shortened does not invalidate the general truth of his remark. 232 Austin Morris Harmon, the poets, even by those of Ammianus' own age.' Nor have I l)een able to find any certain indication of its occurrence in tlie rhythmical prose of Sedulius, Cassiodorus or Ennodius.^ In the grammarians, however, there are some traces of the phenomenon. Velius Longus says,^ aquani qnoqiie per q scribcntes nomen ostendiiinis, per c vera verbum ab eo quod est aciio, utinam acuam. Now if men had to be told to write aqiiam when they meant water and acuam when they meant sharpen, we can fairly infer that they made little if any distinction between qu and cu in pronunciation. The remark of another grammarian,* vacua uoii vaqua, vacui nan vaqui, points in the same direction. And there is still more significance in the state- ment of Consentius,^ u qnoquc litteram aliqui pingnius ecferunt, ut cum dicunt ueni putes trisyllabuui iucipcre. To be sure it is the syllabication of initial ii to which his words primarily bear witness, but it stands to reason that any i)erson who made ueni a trisyllable would have treated Quadi, for example, in the same way. In fact, qu appears to have been much more subject to syllabication than initial u, inasmuch as Ammianus, who makes so free with qu, does not allow initial u to count as a syllable. There is then some evidence for the existence of a considerable tendency- in Latin toward the syllabication of qu. For aught I see to the contrary, the tendency may have been especially strong in late Latin. Even if a pronunciation as Inroad as that of Ammianus were general in his time, we could not expect to find adequate recognition of the fact either in the poets, who would follow tra- dition, or in the grammarians, whose concern was always with the written rather than with the spoken language. Tliis consideration undeniably lends much weight to the scanty evidence that we ac- tually find, which, although it is far from strong enough to be de- cisive, is yet sufficient to make us hesitate to ascribe the broadness of Ammianus' pronunciation to Greek influence. Another fact still remains to be recorded in regard to Ammianus' > Yet the syllabication of n in ciii (e. g. Martial I. 104, 22) is parallel. ' Subsequent investigation may reveal it in the usage of other writers — juay perhaps reveal also that some writers who do not allow qu to ooniit as a syllable have a tendency to avoid using words containing qti in the clausula, which would be hardly less significant than positive testimou}'- in support of our point. » K. VII. 75. 10. * Probi App. K. IV. 197. 23. » K. V. 395. 15. Tlie Clausula in AniDiiamis Marcclli)iiis. 233 treatment of ^/— namely, that syllabication occurs also after r in the words seruo and obseruo (I. 254. 8 ; 263. 11 ; II. 117. 3; 269. 23; 273. 23), and possibly in paruus (II. 269. 5 ; 33. 1 7). Herein, of course he again contravenes poetical usage, in which the only approximation to a parallel is the ante-classical lania, laruatiis, and /(T/nW/s (^Friap. 32. 13j. Neither initial nor intervocalic u appear to be sul)ject to syllabi- cation in his pronunciation. 1 QUANTITY. For the sake of completeness mention should here be made of the fact already established that Ammianus was to all intents in- different to vowel-quantity but not to syllabic quantity produced by position, which within certain limits is observed in his clausulae.^ It has also been demonstrated previously that in his observance of positional quantity syllables ending in -ns and -nt are not considered long.'^ FORMS. In regard to the form of the genitive singular of nouns witli -io- stems the clausula reveals nothing new in the usage of Ammianus and simply confirms the testimony of the manuscript to the effect that in proper names both the old form in -/ and the newer form in -// are used indifferently, while in common nouns only the newer form is employed.* In proper names the old form in -/ is demanded Ijy the clausula (sometimes against the manuscript) in Constant! I. 67. 6; 25. 26; 38. 15; 284. 13 Antoni I. 319. 8 Eusebi I. 153. 22 Theodosi II. 185. 26 Vadomari I. 233. 27 Danubi I. 139. 1 The new form is demanded, either with or without manuscript sanction, in * There are so many instances in which he does not resort to it tliat we can hardly employ it to explain the two clausulae Masso Vetemeusi (I. 42. 30) and saevum reperton-m (IT. 193. 8). » p. 187 ff. » p. 192 and note 3. * Neue, Formenl. I. 154. 234 Austin Morris Harmon, Constantii 1. 46. 1 ; 150. 21 ; 251. 26 Craugasii I. 168. 19; 208. 18 Chnodomarii 1. 102. 82 Aesculapii I. 296. 9 Procopii II. 89. 17 Strategii II. 75. 16 Vulcatii I. 253. 4 The only case, as far as I know, of a common noun with the genitive in -i is triclini (I. 48. 17), which is called for by the manu- script as well as by the clausula, and which is to be accounted for b}^ the fact that the title triclini rationalis had become formulaic through long use. Instances of the ordinary genitive in -;'/ may be found in the following passages: I. 96. 11 ; 103. 15; 113. 4; 175. 25; 193. 11; 279. 17; 284. 13: 317. 16; II. 4.9. Other points that I have noted in this connection are liut few. The laws of the clausula support the manuscript reading commmiibal in I. 163. 7 and require the introduction of the s